I know the difference between with and without prejudice. My point was your usage of mistrial vs dismissal. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c35c/1c35c7a4ee26ec9aced0c4eeace57bc4ab712ee1" alt="Man facepalming :man_facepalming: š¤¦āāļø"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c35c/1c35c7a4ee26ec9aced0c4eeace57bc4ab712ee1" alt="Man facepalming :man_facepalming: š¤¦āāļø"
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Binger should now start asking about the Russian ammo. That is his last chance!![]()
would the difference be circumstance? A dismissal because of lets say lack of evidence as opposed to a mistrial because the prosecutor is an *** clown?I know the difference between with and without prejudice. My point was your usage of mistrial vs dismissal.![]()
"so you used Tula ammo"I was actually worried about that. If he starts mentioning it was Tula, you know he is going after environmental charges, too!
I know the difference between with and without prejudice. My point was your usage of mistrial vs dismissal.![]()
It's a good thing he didn't hit jump kick guy. He was an African gentleman.Make no mistake - had even one of the people Kyle shot in self defense as he was being attacked was BLACK, they're gonna have to convict just to keep the streets from burning. media can't really spin this case as a race war sadly
Wisconsin prosecutors have no power to immunize people from Federal charges.I guarantee he has immunity or itās a wink and a nod agreement like what the prosecution surely has with rittenhouses friend Dominick who bought the rifle.
Think he's stupid enough to have a marijuana card?I donāt think grosskruetz is a prohibited person. I know he has one or a few convictions but I donāt think heās a PP from those.
Her charms escape me.Oh man everyone needs to watch this Heather woman. Totally not guilty, but has this 'band camp' aura to her testimony. That and it was all memorized. Entertaining stuff check her out on video at 1:06
Did the judge bite his tongue because he was about to tell the prosecutionSome video here
Litmus test:I think there will be a judge's ruling after lunch. This case is quickly reaching the end. He was smart to not get heated at that moment.
In the 40W range.*frantically searching ammo warehouses for Hollow Point FMJ bullets*
I have to wonder whether the judge is worried enough about the jury getting doxxedLegal minds, what would be a more damning commentary on the prosecution.
A Not-Guilty on all accounts within the first 1/2 hour of deliberation,
A directed verdict at the end of testimony,
A mistrial with prejudice?
would the difference be circumstance? A dismissal because of lets say lack of evidence as opposed to a mistrial because the prosecutor is an *** clown?
I mean, Belle Delphine is technically African tooIt's a good thing he didn't hit jump kick guy. He was an African gentleman.
Oh, But they are. āHe shot and killed people protesting the shooting of a black man.ā is what Iāve been hearing on the radio today.Make no mistake - had even one of the people Kyle shot in self defense as he was being attacked was BLACK, they're gonna have to convict just to keep the streets from burning. media can't really spin this case as a race war sadly
POSSESSION OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON BY A PERSON UNDER 18
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN EMERGENCY ORDER FROM STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
There is plenty of evidence and self incrimination on those 2 charges, since those 2 are real - i believe that will keep from a mistrial with prejudice, and directed verdict. However a mistrial that can be retried is very much on the table.
Make no mistake - had even one of the people Kyle shot in self defense as he was being attacked was BLACK, they're gonna have to convict just to keep the streets from burning. media can't really spin this case as a race war sadly
Missed that. Thanks.Wrong. The second one has already been dismissed.
Absolute highlight. I was grinning ear to ear.Glorious Watching judge Schroeder shout at that little snobby clown Binger.
The unelected resident in chief did- what makes you think his mouthpieces won't?
View attachment 541201
if they can get on him illegal possession, that negates the self defense doesnt it? Even though its only a misdemeanor?
While questioning Rittenhouse, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger implied that his silence ahead of the trial was potentially incriminating. Rittenhouseās attorney objected to the line of questioning. After instructing the jury to leave the room, the judge sustained the defenseās objection and berated the prosecutor for implying Rittenhouse should be penalized for exercising his constitutional right to remain silent.
āThis is a grave constitutional violation for you to talk about the defendantās silence, youāre right on the border line, you may be over. It better stopā¦This is not permitted,ā the judge said, speaking to the prosecution attorney.