Why not?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Why not?
Having a psych evaluation should occur when you’re obtaining an object that has the capability to immediately take a life.Why not?
Oh my god we have a future school shooter here on NES we need to red flag his a$$. @idefhavecovid at the end of the day he will appreciate us saving him.Wtf are you talking about?
Stupid asinine comment, I never said or implied that I wanted to shoot a school. I would never do that.Oh my god we have a future school shooter here on NES we need to red flag his a$$. @idefhavecovid at the end of the day he will appreciate us saving him.
One could argue a vote is far more dangerous than any firearm but besides the point let's run with your theory here for a moment.Having a psych evaluation should occur when you’re obtaining an object that has the capability to immediately take a life.
Voting is not on that scale, so it shouldn’t require it. You should only need to be a citizen to vote.
All of those objects have other uses than to take livesOne could argue a vote is far more dangerous than any firearm but besides the point let's run with your theory here for a moment.
What other items that American's buy should subject them to a psych evaluation?
Knives?
Axes?
Cars?
Chemicals?
Handtools?
You have dropped hints it's time we collectively stand together against a future child killer!!Stupid asinine comment, I never said or implied that I wanted to shoot a school. I would never do that.
Man your life must be sadYou have dropped hints it's time we collectively stand together against a future child killer!!
So do firearms.All of those objects have other uses than to take lives
Putting food on the table is still taking lives. And “for fun” isn’t a reasonable argument whatsoever. I think we will see a large movement toward gun restrictions and I’m glad.So do firearms.
Many use them as a hobby because it is fun.
Many use them to put food on the table.
Etc. etc.
So to be clear it's not about items that take lives. You just think it should apply to firearms. Now that we have that settled can you direct all of us who haven't attended law school to where it says a Constitutional right can only be exercised when your subjected to a psych eval?
So killing a human is equivalent to a rabbit or deer? Interesting take.Putting food on the table is still taking lives. And “for fun” isn’t a reasonable argument whatsoever. I think we will see a large movement toward gun restrictions and I’m glad.
Now that we have that settled can you direct all of us who haven't attended law school to where it says a Constitutional right can only be exercised when your subjected to a psych eval?
It is ... it's very sad ... here on a holiday weekend I have nothing better to do than to create a complex interaction with a supposed attorney which is highly unlikely. I say as such because your level of the English language, retorts and sentence building is that of a 7th grader. There is a teacher actively posting here on this thread who would agree with me.Man your life must be sad
Oh dude you probably feel retarded because you’re just retarded.
He is no lawyer if he was his choice of words would hardly contain retard.Yeah .... dude. The surfing lawyer.
Stupid asinine comment, I never said or implied that I wanted to shoot a school. I would never do that.
Oh, please. Do you really think we have not read this script before? This is the point where someone responds asking if kids were run over by a car, that we should ban cars. You respond that cars are not made to kill people while THE AR-15 is or some crap like that. Someone then asks about your guns, then you reply they also are not made to kill people. Then someone asks what you have, and you claim to have some $2700 O/U shotgun, a muzzleloader for deer, and a Pedersoli 22LR target gun. Thus your position is we should be only able to defend life and liberty with something that by coincidence happens to do the job. This argument then extends to knives, so we soon find ourselves with (literally) pointless kitchen knives as the maximum. Right? So I just saved us a lot of time. Short version - we disagree - weapons that are intended to harm people are exactly the weapons intended under the 2nd Amendment, specifically those that will dissuade the attacker from thinking they have overwhelming force, and thus dismantling the entire basis of attack.
And there it is. Would you be so kind as to let us know which page of the script you're on, so we can save time?All of those objects have other uses than to take lives
I do want to clarify a $2700.00 O/U shotgun is a poor mans shotgun once you start shooting them. It's mind blowing what an engraved receiver can add to value!and you claim to have some $2700 O/U shotgun,
An object that is made butter bread is regulated in the UK because it can take a life if used incorrectly.Having a psych evaluation should occur when you’re obtaining an object that has the capability to immediately take a life.
Voting is not on that scale, so it shouldn’t require it. You should only need to be a citizen to vote.
I would imagine No.2 is one of the most deadly items sold in mass quantities worldwide. My Ticondoroga would be my first choice for PP. Consider it a bull barrel.An object that is made butter bread is regulated in the UK because it can take a life if used incorrectly.
Yes, and this one didn't have anything to do with it being a school, other than the killer used it to exact revenge on Amish farmers.So, exceptionally rare for a school shooting to not be a public school.
$1 in 1990 = $2.21 in 2022Shotty'd be better for fish in a barrel.
As, of course, would what was the weapon of choice in the (pre 9/11/2001) deadliest mass murder in New York City history:
One United States dollar's worth of gasoline.Happy Land fire - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Uvalde doesn't fit the profile of someone manipulated by agents or informers. There was no racial or religious or sexual component.From the archives:
BUSTED: Parents Catch FBI in Plot to Force Mentally Ill Son to Be a Right Wing Terrorist
The parents of a severely mentally disabled man are speaking out on how the FBI groomed him as a right wing terrorist, knowing he's paranoid schizophrenic.thefreethoughtproject.com
It’s become a near-weekly occurrence. Somewhere in some state, the FBI will announce that they’ve foiled yet another terrorist plot and saved lives. However, as the data shows, the majority of these cases involve psychologically diminished patsies who’ve been entirely groomed, armed, and entrapped by FBI agents. Simply put, the FBI manufactures terror threats and then takes credit for stopping them.
Even the official DHS "Run-Hide-Fight" video says that. Most schools and corporate workplaces use this for training, or some variant of it.You don't stop for shit in an active shooter. It was drilled into us to avoid people trying to grab us for help, kids screaming 'help me', you keep going. This is why everyone, myself included, was looking for the 'why' they stopped. You don't stop until the threat is gone.
Edit: At most you try and gather intel from people able to talk. How many, last seen, quick then move on.
Uvalde doesn't fit the profile of someone manipulated by agents or informers. There was no racial or religious or sexual component.
Buffalo does. The shooter was known in online circles that are so extreme that he was probably the only non-cop involved.