J
Jose
I seriously doubt it. The full size does the job just fine.You could hold your breath and see if S&W is ever going to come out with mid-sized M&P (plenty of rumors that they will on the net).
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
I seriously doubt it. The full size does the job just fine.You could hold your breath and see if S&W is ever going to come out with mid-sized M&P (plenty of rumors that they will on the net).
I seriously doubt it. The full size does the job just fine.
It's too big (IMHO ) for CC, just like the G17
I seriously doubt it. The full size does the job just fine.
Shoot a MA M&P and get back to us about the trigger.
Funny, I can conceal one just fine even in NPEs
some people carry a gun just to feel good about carrying a "gun." other people carry a functional, reliable, firearm they can hit shit with. evidently.
Funny, I can conceal one just fine even in NPEs
Pics? Just kidding.
the FIST #20 holster is the only one I've ever worn that pushed the grip in so tightly. Something about its design that does it.
I took that picture this morning just before leaving for an IDPA match. I drove 1.5 hours each way, shot a classifier, and ran a bunch of errands after the match. Basically I just took off that rig for the first time since 7:30 this morning. No problems.What is the comfort level like on that? how is it while sitting/driving?
I seriously doubt it. The full size does the job just fine.
i'd rather be uncomfortable and carrying a full sized firearm, than comfortable and carrying a sub-compact 1911.
There's a 1/4" or less difference in all dimensions between a Glock 19 and a S&W M&P9. I seriously doubt they feel that much different.Yeah, but it doesn't change the fact that they don't have a mid size gun. If you haven't carried a G19/23/32 then you probably won't understand.
Get it fixed by a competent gunsmith or drop in APEX parts. IF you could buy a glock new in MA it would suck too.
Yeah, that. The Beretta PX4 is probably a good series of pistols to look at - they come in full, compact and sub-compact sizes and have replaceable backstraps to improve fit. It's basically a proven design (8000-series Cougar) done up in a polymer frame. Given the G19 is size-wise what he's after but the feel isn't right, then perhaps the PX4 can be adjusted to work.Beretta PX-4 Storm, Bersa pistols, the compact size Sigma (some people like 'em)...in Mass. your options are very limited.
Why are you using the sear release in there? That was put there by S&W to keep stupid cops from shooting themselves when taking the gun apart.I got the friggen take down lever stuck between the slide and the frame right in front of the customer, which is interesting becuase i was specifically trying to avoid that.
Why are you using the sear release in there? That was put there by S&W to keep stupid cops from shooting themselves when taking the gun apart.
Normal people turn the takedown lever, release the slide and ride it into battery, then pull the trigger JUST LIKE A GLOCK.
I know there are M&P fans boys here, but I dont even want to hear there arguments. I've shot them, handle them several times a week and still despise them.
That said, as others mentioned, taking a class that covers proper trigger press in the face of the odd Glock trigger may change everything.
There's a 1/4" or less difference in all dimensions between a Glock 19 and a S&W M&P9. I seriously doubt they feel that much different.
i'd rather be uncomfortable and carrying a full sized firearm, than comfortable and carrying a sub-compact 1911.
I f-ing hate that place....... m4carbine.net.....
What is the comfort level like on that? how is it while sitting/driving?
That said, as others mentioned, taking a class that covers proper trigger press in the face of the odd Glock trigger may change everything.
I know there are M&P fans boys here, but I dont even want to hear there arguments. I've shot them, handle them several times a week and still despise them.
![]()
Here's a pic of it. There is a metal frame that's in the polymer frame (chassis) but the rails are not part of it.
The front locking block and sear block are actually where the rails are. Everything else on the frame that looks like a rail is actually plastic.
I've had the gun in pieces sandblasting it for cerakote and I've been making note of what is plastic and what is metal.
What you see as the "chassis" in their picture is actually misleading. The "chassis" is 2 rails, one on each side. They are not connected (boxed). They included the front locking block and sear block in the picture and they shouldn't have.
Having the front locking block and sear block in places completes this box, however they are guided in place by plastic rails and then a pin is driven through them to connect them to the "chassis"
I'm starting to think about this, I am a good shot w/ everything except my Glock, from what I've read my problem (consistent low and left) can be a problem w/ people who convert to glocks and can be solved w/ less trigger finger (contrary to the shot wheel)![]()
The M&P has never really interested me, but I was even less interested when I read the thread where Underwhere had it all apart looking at the insides.
So what your reasoning behind not liking because of the chassis? The rails are not load bearing. The locking block is not going move. It allows S&W to use the same parts on smaller frames with minimal change in parts.
It seems too flimsy to me.
I f-ing hate that place.