mothybee
NES Member
Your second answered your first.Has anyone asked Linsky, and is there an answer to, "What problem does this proposed new live-fire requirement solve?"
We all know it's bullshit, and just adds cost and complexity to an already costly and overly-complex licensing system. But why is he saying it should even be a requirement?
----------------------------
Edited to add:
My question is still valid. The 18 year-old from Montana wasn't able to bring his handgun to MA due to any "loophole." Without a valid MA LTC (which he'd need to be 21 to get), he was not legally allowed to bring it to MA. There was no loophole. And even if he had live-fire training requirement, how would it have prevented this or any other shooting?