Assault Style Firearm Update – March 27, 2025

Maybe I am just stupid.

However, to the state, they are codifying the Attorney General’s 2016 Enforcement Notice

So if they are codifying the 2016 AG Notice into law, wouldn't that infer that the 2016 AG Notice wasn't a law? Did they just admit it wasn't a law?
Are they now applying a law retroactively that wasn't a law before?

WTF

I can't hate this state enough...

I think their position is that all post-94 ARs had previously been illegal, but under the new law they're generously making pre-16 ARs legal.
 
I don’t care anymore

This.

Well, the new law codified the 2016 date so it doesn't seem to matter much. It doesn't codify her entire edict, just select parts of it. The whole situation is ridiculous, and the language of the current law needs to be able to be read, understood and applied on its own, without going back to what used to be (as GOAL notes).

I know it sounds like a weird thing to admit, but I really do want to see them try to prosecute any aspect of this. Any appellate court would have a field day with this pile of shit. Just an absolute legislative debacle, wrapped up in an anti-Bruen temper tantrum.

I'm kinda fine with this law, actually. All it does is weaken the state's government. That's a win, though it may take awhile to bear fruit.
 
People who hate guns, understand little if anything about them, want to ban all of them, trying to write language that allows them to dance around Heller and Bruen........

So it's confusing language....I'm shocked.....
 
ohh, they do not hate guns at all.
they hate only you, and your right to own anything, including guns.

but they reserve right for themselves to keep owning everything, as long as you will be prohibited from ownership.
You are not wrong but the Left hatred of guns is based on it exposes their failures in Blue cities and the crime their policies have created.
 
meanwhile Healey told everyone who had a legally owned stripped receiver pre 7/20/16 they could build them out as long as they could prove they owned the receivers legally. Now the law that codifies what she said says NOPE those are legal as stripped receivers but illegal as completed rifles because you waited to long to complete them. Seems legit.....
 
BEFORE 7/20/2016 is interesting since the press conference was 7/20/2016 and shops worked to sell out their inventory on that day. There are a lot of ON 7/20/2016 guns out there.

I sure hope there is a lawsuit ready to go. This "interpretation" of the new law is completely inconsistent with what is written and goes to codify a press conference that when litigated previously was deemed "no harm, free speech".

Why do we all still live in MA?
The bigger question is: why do we have such shitty governors, "representatives", judges, DA's and AG's?
 
meanwhile Healey told everyone who had a legally owned stripped receiver pre 7/20/16 they could build them out as long as they could prove they owned the receivers legally. Now the law that codifies what she said says NOPE those are legal as stripped receivers but illegal as completed rifles because you waited to long to complete them. Seems legit.....
Leftist lying you say?
 
why do we have such shitty
i can tell you why.

24K voters in my town. 7K total shows up to vote.
70% of those who did show up - ~4K - vote to override tax limits and raise property taxes for EVERYONE, to cover +$7mln gap, just for fun of it, as it is good to pay more.

that is how it works.
 
meanwhile Healey told everyone who had a legally owned stripped receiver pre 7/20/16 they could build them out as long as they could prove they owned the receivers legally. Now the law that codifies what she said says NOPE those are legal as stripped receivers but illegal as completed rifles because you waited to long to complete them. Seems legit.....
Exactly, and this is in writing.

It’s a hard position to take that rifles built on pre 7/20 AR receivers are unlawful.

This is going to create an absolute cluster fk if GOAL’s points are the final version. It is not consistent with the law as written and not consistent with prior AG guidance either.

I’m still scratching my head how post 7/20 lowers are unlawful. 10 years of dealer audits and no one was pinched for this?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 979393

By their own admission - a pre 2016 AR lower is good to go to be built into a rifle.
It does not have to be registered. There was no way to register a lower back then.

I've been saying for some time that post 2016 lowers are worthless and pre 2016 lowers are valuable.

The AG has FINALLY put this into writing.
Poor reptile
 
i can tell you why.

24K voters in my town. 7K total shows up to vote.
70% of those who did show up - ~4K - vote to override tax limits and raise property taxes for EVERYONE, to cover +$7mln gap, just for fun of it, as it is good to pay more.

that is how it works.
Part of the problem is a weaker society, yes; but the other problem is the flaws of democracy and the excuses the state will use to justify whatever laws they deem necessary for us, even if they aren't really needed. We need to gain power if we want our freedoms.
 
By their own admission - a pre 2016 AR lower is good to go to be built into a rifle.
It does not have to be registered. There was no way to register a lower back then.

I've been saying for some time that post 2016 lowers are worthless and pre 2016 lowers are valuable.

The AG has FINALLY put this into writing.

That doesn't change anything. For the 900th time.... That's not what the f***ing law they just passed says. The law they just passed textually, nullifies all that bullshit.
 
I know it sounds like a weird thing to admit, but I really do want to see them try to prosecute any aspect of this. Any appellate court would have a field day with this pile of shit. Just an absolute legislative debacle, wrapped up in an anti-Bruen temper tantrum.

I'm kinda fine with this law, actually. All it does is weaken the state's government. That's a win, though it may take awhile to bear fruit.

They're not going to, because they like people like Rapetile (and like 50 shitty gun shops that parrot the same kind of things) getting all faggoty over this kind of thing and scaring people. That's worth more equity to them than a single person in jail, is making thousands afraid of fake/imaginary bullshit. The AG's office has always been about the "fear machine" over everything else.
 
That doesn't change anything. For the 900th time.... That's not what the f***ing law they just passed says. The law they just passed textually, nullifies all that bullshit.

They're not going to, because they like people like Rapetile (and like 50 shitty gun shops that parrot the same kind of things) getting all faggoty over this kind of thing and scaring people. That's worth more equity to them than a single person in jail, is making thousands afraid of fake/imaginary bullshit. The AG's office has always been about the "fear machine" over everything else.
So, what are you saying?

Are pre 7/20/16 lowers legal or not?
 
So, what are you saying?

Are pre 7/20/16 lowers legal or not?

I'm saying that 7/20/16 is still completely meaningless.

For the 901st time.

Nobody is ever going to get prosecuted based off that bullshit. It's been like almost a decade and all you fear spitters have is one case you can't even give us the
details on, that probably got CWOFed out. (people keep telling me theres some case, but it sounds like fiction/smoke to me).
 
Back
Top Bottom