Sorry it this seems likes a silly question but as I said I'm just a CMP/NRA 200/300/600 Yard Service Rifle (20") Competitor.
These cool looking rifles you guys are building with 10" barrels are obviously / probably not meant to be 100 yard benchrest guns or 200 yards or beyond slung up tight position shooting guns.
How do you test and what do you use as criteria to determine if one barrel is more accurate than another?
What do you consider good or acceptable accuracy out of these 10" barrel setups?
Distance / MOA ?
Thanks,
George
I always shoot with a tight sling when I can. Which is why I built the 16 inch gun above. It has a carbon fiber free float tube.
As I'm guessing you know there are an infinite combination of choices you can make with respect to barrel length, barrel thickness, sight radius, and accuracy.
But here are some general truisms.
Assuming no wind, assuming the use of optics, a short barrel will be more accurate than a long barrel for a given diameter. It will be stiffer and therefore more precise.
Tweaking these assumptions, things get more complex. For example, holding barrel diameter constant, a long barrel on an iron sighted rifle will decrease mechanical accuracy just like above, but will increase practical accuracy as a result of the longer sight radius. You see tricks areound thses compromises when people use things like bloop tubes. This allows the user of a shorter and stiffer barrel with the longer sight radius of a longer barrel.
If you add wind into the equation it gets even more complicated. A longer barrel pushes a bullet faster so there is less wind drift at longer distances. So a scoped rifle with a longer barrel may be more accurate than a shorter barrel on a windy day despite its lower mechanical accuracy.
I hope this all makes sense. Its all a balancing act, a set of choices and compromises.
With all that said, a reasonably heavy 10" barrel can give outstanding accuracy if the rifle is scoped. Noveske, who makes some of the more accurate non-match grade barrels for ARs, sells a stainless 10" barreled upper that is easily a 1 moa shooter. But you need a scope. The sight radius is simply too short for really precise shooting.
The fact that most of these 10" barreled guns aren't really very accurate comes from 3 factors.
1) Military specification chambers - Loose chambers and long freebore are all conducive to reliability, not accuracy. (The lothar walthers use Wylde chambers, which are a great compromise between accuracy and safety if someone uses a 5.56x45 round in it rather than .223.
2) Chrome plated chamber and bore. All else being equal, a chrome lined bbl won't be as accurate as a non-chrome lined bbl.
3) Short sight radius - A gun with a carbine gas system has a lot less sight radius than a gun with a rifle length gas system.
I hope this helps.
As an aside. I've set some minimums for any AR upper that I will ever build or buy.
1) Barrel will be stainless with a Wylde chamber
2) It will have a free floated barrel.
3) it will have a sling attach point on the FF tube.
The 10.5" LMT upper is worth too much for me to bastardize. I'll probably sell it at some point and build a SBR upper myself that meets my criteria. Again, I'm no Creedmoor cup champion, but I do prefer to shoot accurate guns.
As for my definition of accuracy, it varies by gun. If I can AVERAGE 2 moa benched with cheap ammo I'm happy. I don't believe all of the people who claim 1 moa groups actually get them. Either that or they shoot 5 - 3 shot groups, pick the best one and claim thats what their rifle is capable of.
Sometimes things are much less quantitative. If I shoot my Glock 34 slowly at 25 ft, I get a decent group. If I shoot my Les Baer slowly at 25 ft, I get one ragged hole. The baer is more satisfying to shoot.