• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Biden announces plan to fund LEAs, enforce laws against FFLs, create "strike force[s]"



Huge Spike in Americans buying F15's after Biden suggests you need them to overthrow the government.


article-8901-1.jpg
 
his voters are just like him

We may actually have a self-solving problem on our hands though.

If you're brain dead enough to vote for brain-dead Biden, you're also brain-dead enough to have taken the vaccine.

So the whole country may turn red in a few years when all the Biden voters who self-selected themselves for elimination start filling up the mass graves.

I've lost count of how many articles I've seen coming out of left-wing propaganda rags bemoaning the fact that there are a bunch of Trump voters who are "vaccine hesitant".

I'm going to get a t-shirt made that reads "I'm not vaccine hesitant - I'm just not stupid" ..... and start wearing it to funerals.
 
"zero tolerance. If you willfully sell a gun to someone who is prohibited from possessing it, if you willfully fail to run a background check, if you willfully falsify a record, if you willfully fail to cooperate with inspections, my message to you is this: We will find you.""

How many FFLs do what he's making a BIG HUGE DEAL out of?

Will this result in more than ten arrests yearly?
It won't be like that. What will happen is when you get an audit and they find some minor BS like you as the dealer forgot to date a 4473 they will pull your FFL instead of giving you notice of a violation. I can see if you have lost guns that come up in your audit they will raise hell. On the oem side it happens often because the buildings and inventory are both big.
 
We may actually have a self-solving problem on our hands though.

If you're brain dead enough to vote for brain-dead Biden, you're also brain-dead enough to have taken the vaccine.

So the whole country may turn red in a few years when all the Biden voters who self-selected themselves for elimination start filling up the mass graves.

I've lost count of how many articles I've seen coming out of left-wing propaganda rags bemoaning the fact that there are a bunch of Trump voters who are "vaccine hesitant".

I'm going to get a t-shirt made that reads "I'm not vaccine hesitant - I'm just not stupid" ..... and start wearing it to fun

This article sums up the situation perfectly.
Especially from left leaning Yahoo News
 
I know everyone likes the "welcome to the rice paddy, bitch!" meme, but there is something missing in that conversation. Our military could 100% wipe their enemies off the face of the earth, especially the cavemen we have been fighting for 20 years, if that was their objective. I am all but convinced that since WW2 our wars and conflicts have been started and drawn out to transfer wealth from us to a select special group of people. Once their enemy is us, the patriotic, flag waving, troop thanking Americans, there will be no money to be made in prolonging that conflict with 1 hand tied behind the enforcers back like our ROE's of the last 20 years so that fight would look VERY different then what the rice paddy meme infers.
 
I know everyone likes the "welcome to the rice paddy, bitch!" meme, but there is something missing in that conversation. Our military could 100% wipe their enemies off the face of the earth, especially the cavemen we have been fighting for 20 years, if that was their objective. I am all but convinced that since WW2 our wars and conflicts have been started and drawn out to transfer wealth from us to a select special group of people. Once their enemy is us, the patriotic, flag waving, troop thanking Americans, there will be no money to be made in prolonging that conflict with 1 hand tied behind the enforcers back like our ROE's of the last 20 years so that fight would look VERY different then what the rice paddy meme infers.
This is a really good point.

I guess my question is as follows: let's imagine for a moment that all the best door kickers in the country all agree to start kicking in their neighbors' doors. They go out and simultaneously take out a not insignificant fraction of the current "patriot movement." Does this cause more of the remaining movement to turn tail than are suddenly woken to the reality that "yes, that can happen here"? What is the actual plan for crushing an insurgency that is literally best friends with the enforcement arm of the government?
 
This is a really good point.

I guess my question is as follows: let's imagine for a moment that all the best door kickers in the country all agree to start kicking in their neighbors' doors. They go out and simultaneously take out a not insignificant fraction of the current "patriot movement." Does this cause more of the remaining movement to turn tail than are suddenly woken to the reality that "yes, that can happen here"? What is the actual plan for crushing an insurgency that is literally best friends with the enforcement arm of the government?
FTR, I don't think this will go kinetic any time soon, just that when it does, it will not go as "we" would like to think.

This will start with them attacking our kids and lively hood first.
 
FTR, I don't think this will go kinetic any time soon, just that when it does, it will not go as "we" would like to think.

This will start with them attacking our kids and lively hood first.
I think this much is a given. In fact, I find it hard to believe it'll go kinetic (with the exception of the rare Kaczynski) unless folks feel like they're really backed into a corner. Humans are really willing to accept a lot of discomfort as long as they still have food and shelter...
 
I know everyone likes the "welcome to the rice paddy, bitch!" meme, but there is something missing in that conversation. Our military could 100% wipe their enemies off the face of the earth, especially the cavemen we have been fighting for 20 years, if that was their objective. I am all but convinced that since WW2 our wars and conflicts have been started and drawn out to transfer wealth from us to a select special group of people. Once their enemy is us, the patriotic, flag waving, troop thanking Americans, there will be no money to be made in prolonging that conflict with 1 hand tied behind the enforcers back like our ROE's of the last 20 years so that fight would look VERY different then what the rice paddy meme infers.

Honestly I don't think anything will ever go kinetic unless there's some other HUGE catalyst event (like a recession that the gov can't print money to fix) to drive it to that point. Rather they'll just stick to all the softy leftist bullshit, and keep grinding people down via death of 10,000 cuts. People will do nothing if their sofa is comfy, the fridge has beer in it and trash programming is on TV etc. If you think about it the globalists would rather just exploit people as long as they can. I mean socialism already has a form of slavery embedded in it, and as long as you can convince joe average retard that its better off to submit to that partial slavery than it is to die for freedom, nobody will pick the latter option. It's quite literally "too easy to do nothing". The machine types would rather just cage us as revenue slaves. It's literally cheaper for them to "cordon us off" and still collect taxes. I think if the bread and circus system imploded you might see something go full retard. That's almost a given though and ideological lines might be very blurry at that point.
 
I know everyone likes the "welcome to the rice paddy, bitch!" meme, but there is something missing in that conversation. Our military could 100% wipe their enemies off the face of the earth, especially the cavemen we have been fighting for 20 years, if that was their objective. I am all but convinced that since WW2 our wars and conflicts have been started and drawn out to transfer wealth from us to a select special group of people. Once their enemy is us, the patriotic, flag waving, troop thanking Americans, there will be no money to be made in prolonging that conflict with 1 hand tied behind the enforcers back like our ROE's of the last 20 years so that fight would look VERY different then what the rice paddy meme infers.

Good point - and I also believe that there were "other" goals in mind (than winning the war) - with all of the conflicts this country has been involved in . I think in Afghanistan in particular - that is very clear. We have never really done much to try and "win" that war. It was always just fought hard enough to look like we were doing something , but not to win. In Iraq though - the US seemed to fight that war a little harder - but we still lost.

There are other conversations though - around this same general subject , that add to the argument that the US military is not going to win a 4th generation guerilla war on it's own territory. The Germans in Yugoslavia during WW2. Pretty sure they weren't holding back, but they never could really "win". Sure - they kept marginal control of the place, but that was thru outright savagery and the investment of a lot of troops that could have been used to better effect somewhere else. Our own civil war and and revolutionary wars have quite a few examples of how guerilla forces won over "conventional" armies.
 
This is a really good point.

I guess my question is as follows: let's imagine for a moment that all the best door kickers in the country all agree to start kicking in their neighbors' doors. They go out and simultaneously take out a not insignificant fraction of the current "patriot movement." Does this cause more of the remaining movement to turn tail than are suddenly woken to the reality that "yes, that can happen here"? What is the actual plan for crushing an insurgency that is literally best friends with the enforcement arm of the government?

They might take out a large portion of the "patriot" movement. But all that will do is create more "patriots".

That is constantly repeated lesson that comes out of these sorts of things. Any sort of resistance movement worth talking about - also quickly learns that they can win people over to their side , simply by taunting the government forces into doing stupid shit. Go read some histories of both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The US military repeated that historical lesson over there. When SF types were in Afghanistan they did pretty good at not pissing off the local population and only taking out the bad guys. Once the ground troops showed up and started kicking in the doors of mud huts and killing innocents, the war going on and on and on was pretty much guaranteed.

In Iraq they disbanded the military and police forces - and that led directly to the formation of ISIS, and put trained people out there with a reason to fight back against the Americans.

When Germans herded entire towns into churches and burned the thing down because some guerillas blew up a train or killed a German officer - it never really stopped the attacks, and it made the people in the next town over think "phuck this - I really need to get out there and kill more Germans now".

Smart Special Forces types - don't make these types of mistakes. That's a lesson from Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan - as well as other wars.

But there's nowhere near enough SF types to blanket the country - and there NEVER can be. So "regular" troops are going to have to do. And I think it's also relevant to look at what is going on with the "woke"military right now. Because they're setting the groundwork for filling it up with ideologues. Antifah members, BLM types, pissed off lefties of all stripes. If you want to win a war against the US government - well you really should hope they continue on this path. Because ground troops filled up with these types of people are GUARANTEED to go around the country pissing people off. You want an almost perfect recipe to create a large resistance movement in this country? Well that is EXACTLY how you do it.
 
Honestly I don't think anything will ever go kinetic unless there's some other HUGE catalyst event (like a recession that the gov can't print money to fix) to drive it to that point. Rather they'll just stick to all the softy leftist bullshit, and keep grinding people down via death of 10,000 cuts. People will do nothing if their sofa is comfy, the fridge has beer in it and trash programming is on TV etc. If you think about it the globalists would rather just exploit people as long as they can. I mean socialism already has a form of slavery embedded in it, and as long as you can convince joe average retard that its better off to submit to that partial slavery than it is to die for freedom, nobody will pick the latter option. It's quite literally "too easy to do nothing". The machine types would rather just cage us as revenue slaves. It's literally cheaper for them to "cordon us off" and still collect taxes. I think if the bread and circus system imploded you might see something go full retard. That's almost a given though and ideological lines might be very blurry at that point.

I would argue - that your argument might have had merit going back maybe 5 years ago.

But today - after 4 years of constant Trump bashing, Antifah & BLM riots, all the cornholeya virus BS, and trannies trannies trannies - I think it's become clear to a lot of people ...... maybe not "enough" .... but a lot more than before , that knuckling under isn't going to get them anywhere either.

We're still at that "too early to shoot the bastards" phase that the famous Claire Wolfe quote talks about. But we're a hell of a lot closer than we were before.
 
Relevant article to the "will shit blow up here" conversation:


==================

Methinks the US may very well be heading toward a social explosion. The phrase “race war “is overwrought if it implies organized units and chains of command. However, in a country awash in firearms, a bloody, disorganized, continent-wide eruption is possible. To think “it can’t happen here” is complacently inattentive. We have already seen it in temporal and geographic piecemeal in the Fergusons and Portlands and Baltimores, in the armed anarchy of the cities. Arguably a broader uprising has failed to happen only because of intense pressure from government and media, and because whites have not acquired a sense of racial identity. If they do, or when they do, Katie bar the door.

Both racial war, and its close cousin, ethnic war, result from contact between groups of different kinds—that is, diversity, which causes most of the world’s bloodshed. Americans seldom notice this. One reasons is that they are constantly told that diversity is a blissful state. But it isn’t. Consider: Catholics and Protestants in Ireland, Sunnis and Shia in many places, Jews and Moslems in Palestine, Hutus and Tutsis in Burundi, Hindus and Moslems in India and nearby, Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, Chinese and Indonesians in Indonesia, French and Africans in Paris, and so on. The assertion that “diversity is our strength” seems an attempt to avoid realizing that it isn’t.

Racial and ethnic conflicts are cruel, often explosive, and irrational. They seldom make sense because the devastation and hideousness are disproportionate to the assigned causes. For example, the differences between Protestants and Catholics in Ireland are so slight as probably to be undetectable to you and me, yet the two fought murderously for years, blowing up pubs packed with member of the other faction. In the American case, nice and good-hearted people will point out that blacks are warm and friendly people if they like you, immensely talented in this and that, have legitimate grievances’ against society, and so on. All true. And irrelevant. Similar things can be said about both sides in most ethnic conflicts.

The prospect for bloodshed grows in the presence of other forms of social tension and is probably proportional to suppression of mention of the frictions. You can’t solve a problem if you don’t admit that it exists. The United States today is bent to the breaking point under many stresses other than racial. Severe economic uncertainty, declining standards of living, growing economic inequality, crushing debt loads to include student debt that hinders normal formation of families, hatred—not too strong a word—between Trump people and the coastal elites who rule the country, actual poverty in Appalachia, the Rust Belt, and the rural South, large and growing homeless populations, immigration, and the recent discovery that America consists of many cultures that do not like each other: New England, Alabama, West Virginia, Jews, Latinos, These constitute a poisonous accelerant that will detonate easily and intensify any conflict.

Note that most of the whites involved in the Floyd eruption were not greatly interested in blacks. They appeared to be bored young with no prospects and much free-floating anger looking for an outlet. The prolonged rioting in Portland involved fairly few blacks. Blacks themselves are furious over being at the bottom of society, also with no prospects, a condition they blame, with encouragement from the media, on racism. If this were the case, it would be easy to correct.

Then, ominously, the imposition of black cultural norms on whites. America is being utterly remade to conform to the desires of blacks, this being pushed by people most of whom do not like blacks. How many of them go to black ghettos to eat, or send their children to black urban schools? Rather the whites opposing “systemic racism” seethe with hostility to the deplorables, whom they detest. and want to shove blackness down their throats. In doing this they are threatening things dear to at least half of the white population: their culture, children, physical safety, and sense of propriety. This is not smart.

The danger is that a flashpoint will come, that for example BLM will mob the wrong house in the wrong state and the occupants will open fire, leaving a dozen dead. The entire country would explode. Nice well-intentioned whites would not be able to protest that they supported the fight against systemic racism. That is not how racial and ethnic wars work.

We are seeing a ferocious attack on the underpinnings of white European civilization , and for that matter of all actual civilizations. Japan, India, China, South Korea—none would buy into the enstupidation and degradation. Neither would Argentina or Mexico, which try to raise their cultural levels. Only America is on a downward path, in search of social justice.

Consider: Math curricula are being dumbed down because blacks do poorly at math, English grammar instruction eliminated because blacks can’t or won’t learn it, entrance exams for the elite and demanding high schools eliminated because blacks don’t pass them, SATs dropped because blacks score poorly on them, promotion exams in police departments eliminated because blacks don’t pass them. Entrance requirements at medical school are lowered because not enough blacks pass them, AP courses in high school eliminated because too few blacks get into them.

Dangerously, the government forbids white parents to have schools teaching what they regard as desirable material at what they regard as acceptable academic levels while requiring what they regard as civilized behavior. White parents are forced to see their children subjected to what they regard as obscene, semiliterate, violent, stupid, a culture dominated by what seems to them, (and would to any First World country) the opposite of cultivation. When parents whose daughter wants to go into electronic engineering see her forced into pseudo math taught by teachers who couldn’t recognize a partial derivative if it spoke to them in tongues, when she ought to be in AP calculus, they are not happy. But there is nothing they can do about it. Yet.

Imposing black intellectual standards on a country that sees itself in competition with disciplined, studious, bright, and exceedingly numerous Chinese engineers has obvious consequences that already make themselves felt. Much of the white population, aware of this, becomes angry and angrier.

The decline started perhaps when the Supreme Court disallowed the use of IQ tests by employers because blacks couldn’t pass them, and allowed affirmative action, racial discrimination against whites, because blacks couldn’t advance without it. This incapacity is the root of the racial problem. It cannot be solved, if it can be solved in any circumstances, in a politically chaotic and censored country that refuses to address it. Renaming buildings and toppling statutes will improve nothing while raising the level of anger among whites.

==================


column continued at the link..................
 
Honestly I don't think anything will ever go kinetic unless there's some other HUGE catalyst event (like a recession that the gov can't print money to fix) to drive it to that point. Rather they'll just stick to all the softy leftist bullshit, and keep grinding people down via death of 10,000 cuts. People will do nothing if their sofa is comfy, the fridge has beer in it and trash programming is on TV etc. If you think about it the globalists would rather just exploit people as long as they can. I mean socialism already has a form of slavery embedded in it, and as long as you can convince joe average retard that its better off to submit to that partial slavery than it is to die for freedom, nobody will pick the latter option. It's quite literally "too easy to do nothing". The machine types would rather just cage us as revenue slaves. It's literally cheaper for them to "cordon us off" and still collect taxes. I think if the bread and circus system imploded you might see something go full retard. That's almost a given though and ideological lines might be very blurry at that point.

I think you can change that to 'when the bread and circus implodes'
 
Back
Top Bottom