Canadians Want Guns LOCKED UP!!!

JonJ

Moderator
NES Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
13,068
Likes
353
Location
Plymouth, MA
Feedback: 11 / 0 / 0
Store guns in central depot
mayor: No reason to have a firearm at home, Miller says

James Cowan
National Post


Gun owners in Toronto may soon be prohibited from keeping their firearms at home even if they are properly licensed
and registered, Mayor David Miller said yesterday.

"There's no reason to own a gun in Toronto -- collector or not. If you are a collector and you have a permit, the
guns need to be stored in a way that they can't be stolen. And perhaps a centralized facility of some kind could
accomplish that goal," Mr. Miller told the National Post. "The law requires gun owners to have proper storage, but
obviously not everyone adheres to that."

Following a spate of shootings in Toronto, the Mayor has asked city lawyers and the police to determine whether the
municipality has the "legal ability" to require individuals to store their weapons at a secure facility such as a
gun club.

"It's a very serious issue and I don't have all the answers to it, but I've spoken to the [Police] Chief as well as
our own legal department to see what we can do," Mr. Miller said.

The Mayor has repeatedly blamed lax gun laws in the United States for some of Toronto's violence, saying half of
the firearms in the city originated in the United States.

While pressing the federal government to stem the smuggling of guns across the border, Mr. Miller said steps must
also be taken steps to address domestic gun problems.

"I understand there was one theft from a collector two years ago, where some of the guns were recovered after being
used in murders in Toronto," he said.

Police have also speculated a theft in June of 46 handguns, along with three rifles and ammunition, from a
collector in Port Hope, 100 kilometres east of the city, has contributed to the recent increase in shootings.

Mr. Miller noted several U.S. cities such as Chicago have passed ordinances restricting handgun ownership. But
legal gun owners argue the new rules would only make life simpler for criminals.

"It would just put all the firearms in one place so they could all be stolen at one time," said Eric Greer of the
Ontario Arms Collectors Association. "That would be a wonderful thing."

Mr. Greer added the Mayor's proposal would not prevent criminals from acquiring weapons, noting Canada enacted its
first handgun registry in 1934.

"It hasn't made one iota of difference. And the reason is the people that registered their handguns don't commit
the crimes. The people who commit crimes don't register their guns. It's as simple as that," he said.

Other gun owners said they are tired of being conflated with murderers and thieves.

"There are legal gun owners all over Ontario who don't go around brandishing their guns, who go through the whole
rigamarole to get licensed properly," said Bill, a member of the Maple Leaf Revolver Club, who asked his last name
not be used citing safety concerns. "The Mayor's not thinking properly."

He added most gun owners would support tough sentences for individuals caught using firearms to commit a crime.

"At most of the clubs, you will hear people say, 'Arrest the guy, look at the law and if the law says to throw him
away for five years or 10 years, do it,' " the gun owner said.

Mr. Miller agreed the courts must be more stringent, noting individuals caught with weapons currently are routinely
released on bail.

"If somebody has a gun, that's illegal, whether or not they've shot it should be irrelevant. They should be treated
like they've shot it and tried to kill somebody," he said. "So when they come to court, they shouldn't get out.
They should be kept in court until they're tried."

Original Link:
http://www.canada.com/national/nati....html?id=6bd4b477-9334-4132-8181-e5bafead1b47
 
JonJ said:
The Mayor has repeatedly blamed lax gun laws in the United States for some of Toronto's violence, saying half of
the firearms in the city originated in the United States.


Ummm, has he ever been to Massachusetts? [shock]
 
Of course half the guns come from the US. How many gun manufacturers are in Canada? Not many.

Canada isn't so bad a place, it's their Liberal Government that SUCKS. And, if we're not careful, it's coming our way.
 
Remember these are the same spinless puke frenchies that were booing our national anthem. The only reason why the country hasn't gone in to a total economic recession is because they have never had to spend squat on a military. They've know this since WWII. As long as we remain the super power in the world, they will use the money saved on low military spending to fund their socialist way of life.
 
I don't suppose it ever occured to the Mayor that crime and shootings might go down if their tight gun laws were relaxed....oops, sorry, just realized - he's part of that great socialized state of Canada...nevermind. [roll]

And btw - locking them all up at a gun club is like putting all the candy in one closet...the bandits would have a field day. That's given that all the crime with guns is committed with stolen firearms, which I doubt. It's just another way of controlling the sheep.

It's also easier to blame us than to look at themselves....heaven forbid.
 
Nickle said:
Lynne said:
Cross-X said:
Hell, I'd rather be shot than stabbed -- stabbing is soooo messy!

Give me a nice clean entrance wound any day!

Unless it's hollow point...that could be a bit messy too. :D

No, 155's are MESSY!


Really?

I thought all they left behind was a fine pink mist!











Blech!
 
Cross-X said:
Nickle said:
From 30 Kilometers away? I don't think so. I won't figure the MOA, but it's not much.

Hey, for us civilians, it would be hard to claim self-defense at a distance of 30 kilometers, wouldn't it?

In MA it's hard to claim self defense at 3 feet. [roll]
 
Cross-X said:
Nickle said:
From 30 Kilometers away? I don't think so. I won't figure the MOA, but it's not much.


Hey, for us civilians, it would be hard to claim self-defense at a distance of 30 kilometers, wouldn't it?

It would be REALLY HARD to claim self defense using a 155, wouldn't it, counselor?

Besides, the 155 isn't the biggest I'd been with. The 8 inch (203mm) has that distiction. You know when they fire. And 100 meter kill radius.
 
Nickle said:
Cross-X said:
Nickle said:
From 30 Kilometers away? I don't think so. I won't figure the MOA, but it's not much.


Hey, for us civilians, it would be hard to claim self-defense at a distance of 30 kilometers, wouldn't it?

It would be REALLY HARD to claim self defense using a 155, wouldn't it, counselor?




Unless I missed something, dead is dead, ain't it?

Does it really matter what you use to do the deed?









Then again, there are issues of portability, concealability, and basic common sense....



Awwwww, forgedda 'bout it!
 
Lynne said:
In MA it's hard to claim self defense at 3 feet. [roll]

Not really. Rape victims claim it all the time as they flail and scream at their attacker while he overpowers and laughs. Armed robery victims claim it when they cower behind the countertop display of Cheezy Poofs. The elderly victim of home invation claims it as he tosses a newspaper at the intruder. Senator Kennedy claims it as tax paid body guards open fire on full auto.

Of course, the state does not condone self-defense with a tool that might actually work if you are not defending Senator Kennedy, but they love the "roll over and take it up the exhaust port" method.

Am i the only one who finds it really strange that the very people (read Government) that wat to remove all our guns are the same people that have continuously increased their own gun collections to defend themselves? Curious....
 
Chris said:
Lynne said:
In MA it's hard to claim self defense at 3 feet. [roll]

Not really. Rape victims claim it all the time as they flail and scream at their attacker while he overpowers and laughs. Armed robery victims claim it when they cower behind the countertop display of Cheezy Poofs. The elderly victim of home invation claims it as he tosses a newspaper at the intruder. Senator Kennedy claims it as tax paid body guards open fire on full auto.

Of course, the state does not condone self-defense with a tool that might actually work if you are not defending Senator Kennedy, but they love the "roll over and take it up the exhaust port" method.

Am i the only one who finds it really strange that the very people (read Government) that wat to remove all our guns are the same people that have continuously increased their own gun collections to defend themselves? Curious....

That's what I meant Chris, hun. If you're a victim that gets the snot kicked out of you, or you get shot or a knife in the kidneys, or raped, and you don't fight back, then you're okay. It's like Ross's old sig line. Just try to defend yourself from being killed, etc. and all of a sudden you're the scum of the earth.
 
Lynne said:
Chris said:
Lynne said:
In MA it's hard to claim self defense at 3 feet. [roll]

Not really. Rape victims claim it all the time as they flail and scream at their attacker while he overpowers and laughs. Armed robery victims claim it when they cower behind the countertop display of Cheezy Poofs. The elderly victim of home invation claims it as he tosses a newspaper at the intruder. Senator Kennedy claims it as tax paid body guards open fire on full auto.

Of course, the state does not condone self-defense with a tool that might actually work if you are not defending Senator Kennedy, but they love the "roll over and take it up the exhaust port" method.

Am i the only one who finds it really strange that the very people (read Government) that wat to remove all our guns are the same people that have continuously increased their own gun collections to defend themselves? Curious....

That's what I meant Chris, hun. If you're a victim that gets the snot kicked out of you, or you get shot or a knife in the kidneys, or raped, and you don't fight back, then you're okay. It's like Ross's old sig line. Just try to defend yourself from being killed, etc. and all of a sudden you're the scum of the earth.


Just be the only one left standing who can tell the tale!

Much easier that way.

And if you are Ross, be ready to explain your five or six shots to the face with your Polar-bear-kickin' .22. [roll]
 
Back
Top Bottom