pdm
NES Member
The first half is explaining why the right shall not be infringed. You can't have an effective Militia if no one can own shit, nor can you train (be well-regulated). Therefore the people must be able to own arms without infringement so the Militia can be effective. It's not own-in-connection-to-service, it's own-so-Militia-can-exist. There's no prior restraint of requiring training in the 2nd Amendment on the ownership of arms.To repeat Thurgood Marshall:
"There are no surplus of words in the Constitution."...
The words are there, and they have meaning and purpose... You can't ignore the first half of the amendment and only pay mind to the second....