Do we have any idea what this process is going to look like? In complexity and scope?
Talk to comm2a. Don't try to do it pro se.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Do we have any idea what this process is going to look like? In complexity and scope?
Talk to comm2a. Don't try to do it pro se.
See the below link and look for the stuff from Dec 14 and beyond. We don't know what it means, but you can reach your own conclusions. You can bet we will be making sure to get Weymouth to clarify what their filings mean.
http://ia601602.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.mad.149330/gov.uscourts.mad.149330.docket.html
My interpretation: "We said we restrict all first-time applicants except special people, now we've changed our minds and only restrict people who don't beg us enough. Please don't make us actually defend our practices in person in front of a judge."
Within their MSJ is the state defining legal carry in public, even concealed, as something licensed individuals should have "the common sense" not to do? Is it the state's expectation that those who can legally carry not carry in public?BTW: Here is a preview of the defendant's MSJ.
...but also that those same individuals have the common sense not to carry a concealed or unconcealed weapon while walking down Main Street.14
Spot on!
Too bad there is not a way to contact all LTC holders in Weymouth and get them all to ask for restrictions removed and to further make sure that all new applicants simply state they want a LTC without restrictions and push the point.
Im a weymouth LTC holder with restrictions. When I applied I was told they would only approve a T&H LTC and don't even think about asking for unrestricted. I'll write a letter. What would it need to say?
See here: We have filed against Weymouth again like the judge asked as well as brought in Winchester and Lowell.
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vb...2A-files-second-Carry-Suit-Batty-v-Albertelli
They're not the only ones. There are others from Winchester who have had their LTCs 'recalled'.Ooh, the Batty plaintiffs licenses are especially interesting since they got their unrestricted LTCs and then the chief did a "take-back". I would think that strengthens the case for a specific harm suffered by the plaintiffs.
They're not the only ones. There are others from Winchester who have had their LTCs 'recalled'.
They're not the only ones. There are others from Winchester who have had their LTCs 'recalled'.
Wow, they sure know how to drag things out..
I don't mean to be impatient, but I'm 69 years old.
Seems like these restrictions on my so-called "carry" permit have been going on since about 1974.
When you get older and weaker, you come to realize that any thug who wanted to,
could just shove you to the ground and kick you into a coma in about 2 minutes.
Hey, maybe they'll let us restricted LTC folks carry non-lethal stun-guns?
Cheers,
Rich
There is another case dealing with stun guns. Until than still ilegal to posses and the court seems to be scared of the quote "universe of weapons"
Is there an end in sight?
We just filed the amended complaint in the new case. This should go a little faster now. At least there will be more activity for a while.
Was your reply for Davis v Grimes
Was your reply for Davis v Grimes
ok then, how is Davis V Grimes going?
Technically, it's probably going to go away. Weymouth and Peabody are issuing mostly unrestricted at the moment and this is a win for us in the sense that things have improved in those two towns. But it's a loss in that there is no court ruling. There is a new case that we have filed which will pick up where this case has left off. That's against New Bedford, Winchester and Lowell.
Lowell ...... Very nice.
Technically, it's probably going to go away. Weymouth and Peabody are issuing mostly unrestricted at the moment and this is a win for us in the sense that things have improved in those two towns. But it's a loss in that there is no court ruling. There is a new case that we have filed which will pick up where this case has left off. That's against New Bedford, Winchester and Lowell.
Wow, they sure know how to drag things out..
I don't mean to be impatient, but I'm 69 years old.
Seems like these restrictions on my so-called "carry" permit have been going on since about 1974.
When you get older and weaker, you come to realize that any thug who wanted to,
could just shove you to the ground and kick you into a coma in about 2 minutes.
Hey, maybe they'll let us restricted LTC folks carry non-lethal stun-guns?
Cheers,
Rich
I think a lot of people gave up on licenses after1998. They all just went off the radar.