Worman v. Baker (MA AWB) Oral Arguments 1-9-2019

Can SCOTUS combine NY and MA into one hearing? Clearly, IANAL.
The NY petition isn't similar enough to either petition from Massachusetts. The could combine on of the NJ carry cases with Gould. The Questions Presented are identical, the underling issues are pretty much the same, and the petitions were submitted by the same attorney.
 
The NY petition isn't similar enough to either petition from Massachusetts. The could combine on of the NJ carry cases with Gould. The Questions Presented are identical, the underling issues are pretty much the same, and the petitions were submitted by the same attorney.
So you don’t think this case will have any persuasion on the healey case?
 
Likely, but more of a kick the can to a later date instead of into the trash.

And it probably will be a later date, because "narrower scrutiny" would seem to mean nothing when the anti-gun courts ignore precedents anyway. The case would go back down and the douche judges would rule against it once more and it will then have make the trip back up to SCOTUS.

I know, think positive thoughts 😒


🐯
 
If you have an impartial mind about firearms and have read about our fight for freedom from the British.
Then the meaning of the 2nd amendment is very easy to understand if you put yourself in their shoes.

Read about what the founding fathers said about the importance of this right they had granted our citizens.
They always intended power of the people and not of government.
It was also included as a last resort as a means of ousting those in government by force in order to preserve the citizen's liberty and freedoms.
Unfortunately, most lawyers and judges are not impartial and have other personal agendas in relation to the lowly citizens owning firearms.

We are living in an elitist world, it's nothing new, it has always been this way.
The rich aren't drafted or fight in wars, the surfs do...

All over the world people are slowly seeing that their govt. can't and won't protect them from violence at home.
At the same time govt. will not allow the lowly surfs to have the same means of protection that those in govt. are afforded.

The Supreme Court will never allow the lowly surfs of the US to exercise our rights we have been granted by our constitution.
They want and will always grant control of our rights to the local and federal government.
The Supreme Court will never take a stand on our second amendment to do so would remove the elitist and govt. power over the people..

The elitist, the undocumented, the criminal and then the law abiding citizens.
That is how our rights are in order of whom gets them first.

Think about the NFA and the $200.00 tax that was imposed in 1934.
Who could afford to pay $200.00 in 1934 for the ownership of a machine gun?
Only the rich!
No machine guns for you poor people..Unless we need to draft you..

Times are changing, but will it be in time before the whole thing goes to sh_t..
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom