Palladin
NES Member
Wish I could comment on fb I work in dracut.
I live there
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Wish I could comment on fb I work in dracut.
I live there
That may have changed with that last round. Brass no longer considered a component or something. Len would know better. (I remember getting the jist that I no longer had to lockup empty brass a while back after the new shit went through) Not being snippy, just fyi
Neighbor could continue to make a fuss, get support, and get traction. I would need to know more about the neighbor who made the call.From "Dracut Incidents" Facebook page:
DPD just responded to a caller who reported seeing a person with "guns" through an apartment window. Location withheld. Officers talked to the gun owner, and "advised the caller of the 2nd Amendment and the right to bear arms."
Link to FB Posting (some good comments): www.facebook.com/DracutIncidents/posts/1121419014541171
Not quite right.
527 CMR 1.00 - Fire Marshal regs on ammo/components does NOT count brass as a controlled component (primers, powder and ammo must be locked up and in "original containers" per CMR).
C. 140 - never required ammo to be locked up. HOWEVER the part of C. 140 that prohibits possession of ammo or ANY components without an FID/LTC requires that no unauthorized (unlicensed) person have access to it. Thus, without actually saying so, it really does mean that it all has to be locked up unless everyone present has a LTC/FID. Sorry, it is rather convoluted.
I stand corrected.
You thought wrong you poor brainwashed serf.
See the way I always understood it was you have a reasonable expectation to privacy. Kinda like if your nailing your wife in the living room don't be surprised when the neighbor knows what her tots look like. Now if he was using them and she's peeking in the basement window that's so dirty she had to rub off a spot that's invasive. But I'd he's holding it up in a street facing window then it's not considered invasion because a reasonable person would know they might get seen there
This.See the way I always understood it was you have a reasonable expectation to privacy. Kinda like if your nailing your wife in the living room don't be surprised when the neighbor knows what her tots look like. Now if he was using them and she's peeking in the basement window that's so dirty she had to rub off a spot that's invasive. But I'd he's holding it up in a street facing window then it's not considered invasion because a reasonable person would know they might get seen there
This.
Not at all. It was moonbatty as all hell and the neighbor is a turd for doing it. All I'm saying is that there is likely no privacy issue here if the neighbor saw the guns through a window. Anything that can be seen from a public space is fair game.I'm confused. So you guys are saying that it's totally cool that the cops were called on this guy because of the window he was standing by?
With a neighbor like that, It would be game on. Starting with telling the other neighbors (if they were not already aware of it) That she is a peeping Tom. That would be just for starters, I would think more up stuff as time goes on.