If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Researcher Davis, in a presentation and discussion for the International Assn. of Chiefs of Police, noted that none of the attackers interviewed was "hindered by any law--federal, state or local--that has ever been established to prevent gun ownership. They just laughed at gun laws."
Why is it more important to find out about cop attackers? More equal?
Why is it more important to find out about cop attackers?
More equal?
Researcher Davis, in a presentation and discussion for the International Assn. of Chiefs of Police, noted that none of the attackers interviewed was "hindered by any law--federal, state or local--that has ever been established to prevent gun ownership. They just laughed at gun laws."
All I needed to see.
All I needed to see.
No way, next thing you are going to try and tell me is that I could die in a head on collision if I don't wear a seatbeltResearcher Davis, in a presentation and discussion for the International Assn. of Chiefs of Police, noted that none of the attackers interviewed was "hindered by any law--federal, state or local--that has ever been established to prevent gun ownership. They just laughed at gun laws."
It's not more important to find out about cop attackers,it's just that the general public isnt't keeping tabs on this data pertaining to civilian shootings against them by gangbangers.The reason for this is there aren't many shootings by gangbangers against good citizens.Gangbangers target other gangbangers or cops period.