I must disagree with you strongly on that. Although I am a libertarian type in most matters (meaning less and smaller government is much better), I strongly favor basic mandatory hunter's education classes.
Surprise, surprise. You've taken a course so your adamant everyone should have to take the same course you did.
Is it somewhat inconvenient for you? Yep. In the short term it might be but over the long term it's much better for new hunters to take the class and to internalize proper safety and hunting practices.
Dude, your not a veteran hunter or shooter. Your opinion means nothing to me. You killed your first squirrel in the last 6 months and you needed a shotgun to hit the friggin' thing. Then you dressed up in orange and took a video of it
. Then you ate it
.
Well I have enough accuracy to kill the same squirrel with a .177 pellet from probably 3 times the distance of your kill
. And I certainly wouldn't make a video about it, because I killed my first squirrel when I was like 12 years old. Your a full grown man for Christ sakes. If you want to make a video go kill something besides a squirrel. A squirrel is childs play.
And the fact you ate it is ridiculous. It just goes to show how little you know (or how foolish you are) and how seriously you took someone on this forum's opinion about eating what you kill. This rule simply does not apply to squirrels or any other rodent. And here you are trying to give me a speech as if you've been into hunting for a long time
!
Just because you moved to NH and got a pistol doesn't mean you know a damned thing. You worship everybody on this forum because they know more than you. I see can see that, and you know it's true. Your acting like some sort of firearms instructor with your tone.
I put you on ignore and I have to still see your damn name everywhere. The ignore feature on this forum is garbage. I wish I didn't see every post you write, every thread you start, and every post including a quote from you.
In the past that knowledge might have been passed down informally from parent to child but many of us were not fortunate enough to have that happen. So a formal mechanism for knowledge transfer from older, more experienced hunters to younger, newer hunters is necessary. And the class is that mechanism.
If one is intelligent enough to pass a basic firearms safety course, law-abiding enough to get a firearms license, I believe that one excursion into the wilderness with anybody who's ever hunted would be plenty. That would actually be more than enough. As previously stated the Wildlife publication literally every rule, season, zone, and requirement.
The rules are in the Wildlife publication. The ability to shoot a firearm safetly is obtained in Firearms Safety course. And
Basic gun safety isn't enough as it needs to be presented within the unique context of hunting. Carrying a firearm for personal protection and hunting with one are two different things as situations differ and it's better for experienced hunters to walk you through how to avoid becoming a statistic. There are also other safety issues related to hunting that don't involve firearms that the class will cover.
I wasn't issued an FID for personal protection. A Basic Firearms Safety course simply does not cover personal protection, nor should it. Shows how much you know.
How do you know what context it needs to be in? As far as I'm aware you've only killed a squirrel, something I did for the first time when I was 12 years old (as previously stated). Because if you took a video of a dead squirrel, I'm sure you would also take a video of any deer or other desirable species you've killed.
I advise you to work out your schedule and attend one of the classes. I had to drive from west roxbury down to another town to take it and it was well worth it. The class will stand you in good stead when you get out into the field and you'll be a better/safer hunter for it.
I will pay no mind to your advice as your not qualified to advise me.
As far as the gun grabbers go, this has nothing to do with them and everything to do with teaching new hunters the right way to enter the sport, keep themselves and others safe and help perpetuate the sport over time.
Wrong. It kills the sport. It makes it difficult for new people to participate.
Less people with exposure to hunting = Less pro-gunners
Less pro-gunners = More people susceptible to gun grabber propaganda
Which ultimately = More banned guns, More ridiculous regulations