Going snubby... LCR vs. SW 442

[Billsail]

Locks are not a MA requirement. S&W decided to put install locks in anticipation of new regulations, and to kiss the AGs ass. Never became a needed feature. I don't know why they continue with it. Once in a while they'll make a limited run of no-lock models, and they sell like hotcakes!

 

[dcmdon]

Is it CA that requires an integral lock?

Either way. The ruger lock inside the grip meets the letter of the law while simultaneously their nose at it.

 

[endus]

Locks are not a MA requirement. S&W decided to put install locks in anticipation of new regulations, and to kiss the AGs ass. Never became a needed feature. I don't know why they continue with it. Once in a while they'll make a limited run of no-lock models, and they sell like hotcakes!

Yea, I thought there was something about not disabling a lock if it had one.

I gather from reading here I was incorrect, though. Honestly, I did the mod so long ago I didn't really bother to follow up on it and I don't feel like cracking the gun open again to remove it. Next time I give it a deep cleaning maybe.

 

[dcmdon]

There are a number of videos on Youtube that show the simple process of removing the lock. Its completely reversible for resale. If you've ever been inside a DA S&W revolver, it is literally a 5 minute project.

I keep saying I'm going to do mine, but it works fine and I haven't gotten around to it. If I am ever inside it for other reasons, I'll definitely remove the lock. But its not a big deal to me.

 

[Sully]

One thing going in the 442's favor is the availability of the 442 pro. For $25 extra, the pro has a cylinder cut for moon clips. Which is a fantastic thing in a small 5 shot revolver.
If you aren't into learning how to use moon clips, then the answer is easy. Get the ruger. There is a version of the LCR that has a grey aluminum frame rather than black. Its very sharp and is generally easier to get than the black one.

Don

The 442 Pro and 642 Pro also have no locks, which a lot of people like.

 

[Sterg]

Locks are not a MA requirement. S&W decided to put install locks in anticipation of new regulations, and to kiss the AGs ass. Never became a needed feature. I don't know why they continue with it. Once in a while they'll make a limited run of no-lock models, and they sell like hotcakes!

I wish I new this.

There are a number of videos on Youtube that show the simple process of removing the lock. Its completely reversible for resale. If you've ever been inside a DA S&W revolver, it is literally a 5 minute project.

I keep saying I'm going to do mine, but it works fine and I haven't gotten around to it. If I am ever inside it for other reasons, I'll definitely remove the lock. But its not a big deal to me.

I wouldn't bother now. I just don't use it. What gets me is I have to keep track of yet another key.

What gets me is, does Ca actually believe someone would use this lock? What's it for anyways, so you can lock it while it's sitting out on your nightstand in case some kid uses it as a pacifier?

 

[dcmdon]

It's impossible to anticipate government stupidity.

In CT dealers are supposed to provide a lock even if the gun comes with one in the box.

 

[Wadcutter]

The 442 Pro and 642 Pro also have no locks, which a lot of people like.

Plus you can reload very quickly with moon clips.

 

[christo000]

i was actually carring the m&P full size 40 wasnt bad not to heavy but now im carring the 642-2 with the 2'' barrel instead of the 1x3/4 or something the 642 is much easier to carry alot lighter and if u get an ankle holster ull never know it was there and wont have to worry about ur shirt riding up or sitting in the car with it being uncomfortable

 

[Beretta92FS]

Can't speak for the S&W, but I am very happy with my Ruger LCR 357 magnum. No regrets whatsoever.

 

[ColdDayInHell]

Man I've been seriously lusting the LCR lately, aaa. Walter White style.

 

[mike01824]

As of taxfree weekend, I went LCR.

 

[boilermaker]

I wanted to bump this thread. I am wondering if people have gone over to the LCr for revolver or continue to buy the J frame, assuming you are keeping the calibers the same across the two?

 

[whacko]

I like ruger. I think the lcr is a great design. Shot one a few times at the range....one my buddy owns. However my carry gun is an sp101 357. My wifes carry gun is a s and w 642 performance center. Sweet damn trigger....classic design look and feel. The lcr is just too much black polymer for my taste. Yes.....look tradition mean alot to me. The j frames are just awesome pocket revolvers. My grandfather carried a chief special in his back pocket of his trousers for decades!

 

[Knob Creek]

My wife had the 442. Switched to the LCR.

 

[Strawdog]

Make it a LCRx and I'm in.