Google AI Says Pre 2016 AR15 Lowers Didn't Need To Be Registered (AG Laws Cited): Info Conflicts With NES Expurts - But Not Massachusetts Gun Lawyers

Reptile

NES Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
30,047
Likes
22,782
Feedback: 126 / 0 / 0
There has been much discussion about this on NES. Lots of NES armchair lawyers chiming in.
Google AI has chimed in with cites.

They claim that AR15 lowers that were obtained before 7/20/2016 DO NOT NEED TO BE REGISTERED.

If true, this means that folks with Pre Healey Lowers are sitting on a gold mine EVEN IF THEY WERE NOT FA10'd.

Google also says that Post Healey Lowers are illegal.

I do not think that the AGO will give additional guidance on the subject since now under the new law their original guidance is codified.



AI Overview
Learn more

Before July 20, 2016, in Massachusetts, AR-15 lower receivers didn't require registration unless they were part of a firearm that was a copy or duplicate of a banned assault weapon, but after that date, the Attorney General's enforcement notice clarified that copies or duplicates of banned assault rifles, including the Colt AR-15, were prohibited.


Here's a more detailed explanation:


  • Pre-July 20, 2016:
    AR-15 lower receivers were not subject to registration unless they formed part of a firearm that was a copy or duplicate of an enumerated assault weapon.
  • Post-July 20, 2016:
    The Attorney General's enforcement notice clarified that copies or duplicates of banned assault rifles, including the Colt AR-15, were prohibited.
  • Enforcement Notice:
    The notice issued by the Attorney General's office on July 20, 2016, clarified what constituted a "copy" or "duplicate" weapon under the assault weapons ban.
  • Prohibited weapons:
    Copies or duplicates of banned assault rifles, including the Colt AR-15 and the Kalishnikov AK-47, are prohibited by the Massachusetts assault weapons ban.
  • Grandfathering:
    The enforcement notice does not apply to weapons obtained on or before July 20, 2016.
  • Registration:
    If you purchased a weapon prior to July 20, 2016, and you have proof that you received the weapon solely for storage or repairs, you may return it provided that you register the transfer.


Google Link Below:

 
Last edited:
So are the NES experts.
An NES expurt will never back me up in court.

An actual lawyer (although many will not like his opinion) will be more than happy to represent me if I get jammed up.

IF I broke the law - that is.

If I had post Healey lowers I would not be flaunting them.

BUT!!! We do need a test case though!!!

We need somebody with "standing".
 
All the AI lawyers seem to have 6 fingers and lizard yes, and three legs.

Maybe it’s me. But I just don’t trust them.
Maybe, but not a single Massachusetts gun lawyer has gone on record to say that post 2016 AR's are legal.
 
Oh really???

What lawyer says post Healey AR's are legal???

And, none of this secret stuff!!!

Post names and quotes.
You first... And 'all' of them. I'm guessing all 'ya got is Giuda, lol...
I don't recall where on the site I read what I read, it's here somewhere but it's not my place to speak for someone else without the source.
 
Back
Top Bottom