If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Just another way to harass legal gun owners, which is their goal.Why do they even care how many guns someone owns in their lifetime? What difference would it make to public safety?
Apparently our new attorney general elect plans to place limits on how many guns a person can own in their lifetime as well ammunition: This was taken directly from her web site:
- Work with the Massachusetts Legislature on measures designed to limit gun and ammunition hoarding, including limits on annual and lifetime gun purchases.
And do they have some sort of weird fetish about getting slapped down by SCOTUS?Why do they even care how many guns someone owns in their lifetime? What difference would it make to public safety?Andrea Campbell said:Work with the Massachusetts Legislature on measures designed to limit gun and ammunition hoarding, including limits on annual and lifetime gun purchases.
And do they have some sort of weird fetish about getting slapped down by SCOTUS?
Perhaps you haven't noticed, but overall, the country is much better than it was back in the 70s, 80s, or 90s.Perhaps you haven't noticed but we are definitely living in a post constitutional America. The state of New York is currently operating in open defiance of the SCOTUS. New Jersey, Illinois, Colorado and probably a few others aren't far behind. There's only one thing that's going to stop these people, and I fear most Americans don't have the stomach for it. Like it or not, the US constitution is much like Barry said, just a piece of paper. The time is coming when they will make criminals out of law abiding citizens using nothing more than a pen.
If we could just prevent the leftist locusts from doing it too.Simple solution-
Move north
Bitch this ain't about safety lolWhy do they even care how many guns someone owns in their lifetime? What difference would it make to public safety?
The folks who moved to Israel came from places where socialism and communism were embraced. It makes sense that Israel leans socialist.Israel lives in a continual state of war. They’re a tiny nation-state surrounded by people who want to destroy them. Our “norms” aren’t theirs.
In 1940's, US made it a crime to sell weapons to Israel. The US weapons embargo lasted for 15 years!The folks who moved to Israel came from places where socialism and communism were embraced. It makes sense that Israel leans socialist.
Yet another concern being expressed about gun bans of all kinds popping up all over (making us into instant felons) being countered with how licensing has gone away in certain of the freer states.Perhaps you haven't noticed, but overall, the country is much better than it was back in the 70s, 80s, or 90s.
Yes, a handful of States are being Dbags, but there are more States today that don't require a license than there have been in the past 50 years, and that number keeps growing. Over 50% of the States don't require a license, compared to the year 2000 when only one State didn't require a license to carry.
It is an ongoing battle in courts.
we’ve sold Israel F-15s and F-35s.Let's be honest: US foreign policy is crap when it comes to Israel. We give them "aid" in the form of military equipment and, in exchange, make Israel make peace with a terrorist organization while it was killing Israeli citizens. We give them our used M-16 rifles and the outdated F-16 A's and B's, and in exchange, Israel goes into Lebanon to do our bidding.
Might be time for a “Gun a Day” calendar….if they don’t already have one.
Israel lives in a continual state of war. They’re a tiny nation-state surrounded by people who want to destroy them. Our “norms” aren’t theirs.
Face facts. The Jews can’t rely on anyone except themselves. They are presently safe only because of their own efforts. They have been sold down the river more times than not.In 1940's, US made it a crime to sell weapons to Israel. The US weapons embargo lasted for 15 years!
During Eisenhower era(1953-1961) the Unites States was playing footsie with Egypt and did not support Israel.
British ships blockaded the ports of Haifa, Tel Aviv and Ashdod to prevent Holocaust survivors from coming to Israel.
During the Suez Canal crisis in 1956, when France and UK talked Israel into joining them, the US threatened UK and France unless they withdrew. France and UK withdrew, leaving Israel holding the bad.
This is why Israel had to be friendly with the Soviets back then. Israelis could not rely on the west! It was the Soviets who gave the green light for Czechoslovakia to sell fighter planes to Israel, and to use two former bases in Yugoslavia as a place to train future IDF soldiers during the period leading up to the creation of Israel. It was socialist-leaning Italy that sold weapons to the young state, despite the US embargo.
Let's be honest: US foreign policy is crap when it comes to Israel. We give them "aid" in the form of military equipment and, in exchange, make Israel make peace with a terrorist organization while it was killing Israeli citizens. We give them our used M-16 rifles and the outdated F-16 A's and B's, and in exchange, Israel goes into Lebanon to do our bidding.
Face facts. The Jews can’t rely on anyone except themselves. They are presently safe only because of their own efforts. They have been sold down the river more times than not.
Perhaps you haven't noticed, but overall, the country is much better than it was back in the 70s, 80s, or 90s.
Yes, a handful of States are being Dbags, but there are more States today that don't require a license than there have been in the past 50 years, and that number keeps growing. Over 50% of the States don't require a license, compared to the year 2000 when only one State didn't require a license to carry.
It is an ongoing battle in courts.
It’s not just Jews. It’s Armenians, Russians, American Indians, Ukrainians, Cambodians, Rwandans, Syrians, and especially Chinese who have been disarmed and then slaughtered.This is why I own guns and so should the rest of the Jewish community
Don’t let the Left bullshit you with changing the definition of words. Like they did when they tried to convince everyone that Jihad ackchyually means a peaceful internal spiritual st…gunfreezone.net
No, he is talking about NY defying SCOTUS and some States that sre not far behind, while eluding to taking up arms.Yet another concern being expressed about gun bans of all kinds popping up all over (making us into instant felons) being countered with how licensing has gone away in certain of the freer states.
Apples and oranges yet again.
Its been yin and yang. You are totally correct, but movement on magazines and sport utility rifles has been in the opposite direction. When I grew up in NY pistols were the "big deal" (6-9 months to get a license) and ARs were no big deal and not even on the radar screen of the National Coalition to Ban Any Gun They Can.Perhaps you haven't noticed, but overall, the country is much better than it was back in the 70s, 80s, or 90s.
Yes, a handful of States are being Dbags, but there are more States today that don't require a license than there have been in the past 50 years, and that number keeps growing. Over 50% of the States don't require a license, compared to the year 2000 when only one State didn't require a license to carry.
It is an ongoing battle in courts.
I agree, why I finished it with "It is an ongoing battle in court".Its been yin and yang. You are totally correct, but movement on magazines and sport utility rifles has been in the opposite direction. When I grew up in NY pistols were the "big deal" (6-9 months to get a license) and ARs were no big deal and not even on the radar screen of the National Coalition to Ban Any Gun They Can.
If our side can routinely get TROs so that this crap doesn't negatively effect people while the court battle goes on for years before the anti-civil rights crowd loses, that will change their willingness to throw bullshit bills at the wall to see what sticks.I agree, why I finished it with "It is an ongoing battle in court".
Lately seems politicians get elected and immediately throw some gun law on the table. The positive of this (if there is a positive), is that some of these laws are so far reaching, it might make it easier to beat them in court and set a precedent.