If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I thought about this in response to today's unity rally where Maura wanted to highlight and support communities that were being harassed, but there's no way that hypocrite would give any kind of acceptance to a community that is at odds with her feelings.
ThisEqual Protection Under Law ain't what it used to be [sad2]. We have a constitution which already explicitly guarantees against trespasses again natural rights and .Gov routinely ignores it. What's one more layer of legislation really going to guarantee? That they really mean it this time?
This passing would actually be good for me. My corporate office is based in PA. The owners are total fudds. have their own hunting preserve and do company hunts regularly, even highlight hunts in the company magazine, but carrying guns are verboten on company property or in company vehicles.
How much of that is attributable to the owner, and how much of that is dictated by their insurance carriers? Before I closed my aviation rental company the premiums were wildly different between letting people do what the FAA allowed for IFR minimums and having much more stringent company imposed limits.
^This. I deal with our carrier daily. We are "essentially" self insured for out own property anyway.No insurance company is even looking at this issue during the underwriting process. Workplace shootings are so infrequent that they are statistical noise.
*****we are being harassed. Why don't we just point out that we are a community too? I am sure she will come around....
How much of that is attributable to the owner, and how much of that is dictated by their insurance carriers?