That's where I'm at. I'm also for anyone that wants to take on the .gov. The more people the better.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
That's where I'm at. I'm also for anyone that wants to take on the .gov. The more people the better.
i agree with the notion of the fight, but one has to be able to recognize a difference between a fight and an attempt to run into the charging freight train with a war cry - 'i will smash you'.
i wish you all the best, nevertheless.
Damn, a radiologist (who makes serious bank) making not the greatest decisions when it comes to the law.
I wish you nothing but luck.
I don't agree with most of the laws, but I abide by them because I am pretty sure I will not like anal sex in prison, or any other place for that matter.
This is what I'm wondering about to. No way I'd want to tackle this without a VERY experienced 2a attorney and/or Comm2a etc.Curious at to whether or not the OP has reached out to any MA firearms lawyers and got turned away.
Personally, if I had the bankroll to fight something like this I would like to have guys that are entrenched in the nuances of law at my disposal.. You can still represent yourself, but nice to have a bunch of options.
You can't buy the Truth. And no attorney wants to lose their livelihood by exposing it.This is what I'm wondering about to. No way I'd want to tackle this without a VERY experienced 2a attorney and/or Comm2a etc.
I suspect they weren't interested and if that's true, it's probably because they don't want bad case law?
Just spitballing
You can't buy the Truth. And no attorney wants to lose their livelihood by exposing it.
The reason no attorney will take this kinda case is because they would be ruining their practice.
Now just for starters, here is the Truth, as proven in the PDF at the beginning of the thread:
1) The license to carry firearms is a professional license. It doesn't apply to average joe bearing arms for his personal use.
2) The meaning of "firearm" includes only a commercial subject matter, and does NOT include your arms for personal use or the military arms you keep for your household (MGL 62C § 55A and MGL 60 § 24).
3) There is no such thing as a "license to bear arms!"
4) The unlicensed possession of a firearm is a regulatory crime, meaning it is properly adjudicated before an administrative board, like the firearms license review board (MGL 140 § 130B) -- In other words they are dealing with a violation of the separation of powers under Article XXX of the Massachusetts Constitution.
5) The proper challenge is an "as applied challenge" and a challenge of for declaratory relief, described by MGL 30A § 7 and MGL c 231A § 8: (involves the validity of a ...license, or other privilege granted by the commonwealth or [an executive branch] agency granting the privilege, ...)
Those who depend on others to be the agent of their liberty will be enslaved.
You must rely on your own intellect to discern the Truth, and let the Truth set you free.
For example, if the NRA is so great, why da F'K have we been steadily lossing our rights over the last 100 years!?
Relying on the NRA is logically stupid AF. If they solved the problem there would be no reason for them to exist.
You really think they want to bring back the 2A? no man, they just wanna milk all y'all scared little puppies begging for a scrap of your own rights, fought and bleed for by giants before our time.
OK, me and the entire rest of the CountyIf you are not a governmental unit (and any agency or instrumentality thereof), and your contractors are not performing a government service, then you indeed LIED when you issued them 1099-misc.
Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
I'm all for a good fight, and my standards are lower than Comm2A's. But there has to be some semblance of a rational argument and at least a small chance of success. This is just crazy and he isn't going to succeed. But I wish I could come and watch, sort of like watching a slow train wreck.That's where I'm at. I'm also for anyone that wants to take on the .gov. The more people the better.
This is what I'm wondering about to. No way I'd want to tackle this without a VERY experienced 2a attorney and/or Comm2a etc.
I suspect they weren't interested and if that's true, it's probably because they don't want bad case law?
Just spitballing
To be specific, who would accede to be counsel for a client... I would wager that most attorneys run away from SC types unless there is a piece of law that aligns with the clients delusions of grandeur and they can come up with a consensus on how to defeat the state.
Holding out for Ryetalyn."Ritalin, stat!"
State or Federal appointed counsel is climbing pay scale ladders.To be specific, who would accede to be counsel for a client
who demanded the right to dictate defense strategy.
Unfortunately She is right, we live in a corrupt one party State that doesn't recognize the Constitution or the Bill of Rights if it goes against their liberal beliefs. And yes WE are part of the problem because we tolerate the oppressive govt. in this State because of jobs, family, etc. I'd be gone if it wasn't for 3 and 5 yr old grandsons and I don't want to be financially ruined and spend years in State prison. That said I recently viewed a Tshirt that said, "Don't F*** With Old People, Life in Prison doesn't sound so bad anymore". Good luck DR. but the law and logic mean nothing to the people you are fighting against. Remember power corrupts.If you're representing yourself in court as your own lawyer then you have a fool for a client. Auntie Maura, our very own bojack horseman AG, will use every legal trick and tool to toss you into a cell and let you rot. Like I said in Massachusetts the punishment for crime is used against the most innocent of people while the vile, wicked and violent of our society are allowed to roam free. I like what you have said and agree with you but the state has near infinite resources, they can spend millions wiping you out financially in order to make an example of you. Without adequate legal representation they will wear you down dollar by dollar until you have nothing left.
Unfortunately She is right, we live in a corrupt one party State that doesn't recognize the Constitution or the Bill of Rights if it goes against their liberal beliefs.
I agree.And yes WE are part of the problem because we tolerate the oppressive govt. in this State because of jobs, family, etc. I'd be gone if it wasn't for 3 and 5 yr old grandsons and I don't want to be financially ruined and spend years in State prison. That said I recently viewed a Tshirt that said, "Don't F*** With Old People, Life in Prison doesn't sound so bad anymore". Good luck DR. but the law and logic mean nothing to the people you are fighting against. Remember power corrupts.
Objectivity.Most Plumbers I know are legitimately smart, clever and skillful people.
they are certainly capable of doing radiology if properly trained.
so why can’t a radiologist defend himself in court?
See you, raise you 1:
The bizarre sleep sessions abound. I'm counting on your get back to this thread.You can't buy the Truth. And no attorney wants to lose their livelihood by exposing it.
The reason no attorney will take this kinda case is because they would be ruining their practice.
Now just for starters, here is the Truth, as proven in the PDF at the beginning of the thread:
1) The license to carry firearms is a professional license. It doesn't apply to average joe bearing arms for his personal use.
2) The meaning of "firearm" includes only a commercial subject matter, and does NOT include your arms for personal use or the military arms you keep for your household (MGL 62C § 55A and MGL 60 § 24).
3) There is no such thing as a "license to bear arms!"
4) The unlicensed possession of a firearm is a regulatory crime, meaning it is properly adjudicated before an administrative board, like the firearms license review board (MGL 140 § 130B) -- In other words they are dealing with a violation of the separation of powers under Article XXX of the Massachusetts Constitution.
5) The proper challenge is an "as applied challenge" and a challenge of for declaratory relief, described by MGL 30A § 7 and MGL c 231A § 8: (involves the validity of a ...license, or other privilege granted by the commonwealth or [an executive branch] agency granting the privilege, ...)
Those who depend on others to be the agent of their liberty will be enslaved.
You must rely on your own intellect to discern the Truth, and let the Truth set you free.
For example, if the NRA is so great, why da F'K have we been steadily lossing our rights over the last 100 years!?
Relying on the NRA is logically stupid AF. If they solved the problem there would be no reason for them to exist.
You really think they want to bring back the 2A? no man, they just wanna milk all y'all scared little puppies begging for a scrap of your own rights, fought and bled for by giants before our time.
We're gonna run out of to
I would anticipate a moreWe're gonna run out of to
Was that motion on for today? If it was it didn't take long.Docket says motion of defendant for bill of particulars denied. Trial set for July 27.
It was may 16. No idea how long it took.Was that motion on for today? If it was it didn't take long.