Important Hearings Wednesday January 23, 2008

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
2,374
Likes
267
Location
Summerville, SC
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
I received this from GOAL and thought I'd share it here.
Best Regards.


Dear Friends of GOAL,

On Wednesday, January 23, 2008 the Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security will be holding a public hearing on bills pertaining to "Gun Trafficking and Gang Violence". The hearing is scheduled to take place at 1:00 PM in room A-1. The following list of bills is set to be heard:

H2293 An Act Establishing a System of Ballistic Identification Oppose
H2340 An Act to Improve the Tracing of Guns Used in Crimes Oppose
H2342 An Act Protecting Children and Adults from Unsafe Handguns Oppose
H2343 An Act to Close a Loophole in the Assault Weapons Ban and Further Reduce Gun Violence in the Commonwealth Oppose
S1354 An Act Regarding the Prevention of Illegal Gun Trafficking and Gun Violence Among Youth in the Commonwealth Oppose
S1383 An Act Preventing Illegal Trafficking of Firearms Oppose

Summaries:

H.2293 and H.2340 attempts to resurrect the discredited idea of creating a ballistics database for every gun sold in the Commonwealth. We note that both are based on a fundamentally flawed concept.

Recently, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives released a report on firearms that were traced. Although the BATFE carefully indicates that the overall data should not be used to construe crime trends, they do show for those crime guns that were traced, an average "time to crime" of more than 12 years.

H.2342 would place into statute the language of 940 CMR 16.00, the Attorney General's regulations on handguns. Given the supreme amount of confusion these regulations are currently causing, such a move would be extremely unproductive for the economic health and safety of the commonwealth.

H.2343 would prohibit licensed dealers from transferring so-called "assault weapons" currently lawfully owned under state law, unless the sale was to a law enforcement official.

S1354 Despite its title, the bill has nothing to do with youth, and the term Youth or Minor is not mentioned anywhere in the bill. This bill does attempt, through further regulation of licensed firearms owners and dealers, to address problems caused by persons who have no license.

Of the 21 sections in the bill, two-thirds are specifically aimed at the law abiding gun owner. Specifically, four create new regulations for law abiding gun owners, five create new crimes aimed only at licensed gun owners, and five involve greater data collection on licensed gun owners! S.1354 represents a continued journey along the failed path of placing more regulation on gun owners in a vain attempt to curb crime.

S1383 This bill creates no new penalty for persons who own or sell firearms illegally. The title is a misnomer, because the bill seeks instead to restrict the purchases of law abiding citizens with firearms licenses.

The entire presumption of this bill is that licensed gun owners are guilty of committing crimes, which is not borne out by the facts. The sponsors apparently believe that by controlling sales made by gun owners with licenses, we can somehow affect the firearms being used by persons without licenses. It is a fundamental error in logic that ensures S.1383 would have no effect on reducing crime. S.1383 is a type of "one gun a month" bill hidden under another title.
Sincerely,


Angela Fisher/GOAL
Gun Owners' Action League
We encourage everyone to attend these hearings!
 
Just out of curiosity, will the NRA or any pro-2A groups be at this meeting besides GOAL?

I'm positive the NRA has state level efforts around the country.

I think it goes without saying that MOST of us cannot attend a 1 PM meeting at the State House. I'd expect the NRA to be standing up for Massachusetts on a state level. I may be totally wrong, but I get the feeling this is not happening.

Kudos to the NRA for their federal efforts, but one must note that in Massachusetts we are already living with laws the rest of the country couldn't fathom. It can only get worse and we need all the help we can get.
 
Time to get out the pens again, everyone.

.40Smith&Wesson said:
I'm positive the NRA has state level efforts around the country.

I think it goes without saying that MOST of us cannot attend a 1 PM meeting at the State House. I'd expect the NRA to be standing up for Massachusetts on a state level. I may be totally wrong, but I get the feeling this is not happening.

If I recall correctly, either GOAL or The GOAL Foundation (or both?) was created in response to law barring the NRA from lobbying in Massachusetts, on the basis that it is not a Massachusetts-based organization. I wasn't able to confirm this from their web sites, but I'd appreciate it if one of the more knowledgeable members would please correct me if I'm wrong.

Man, I WISH I could make a 1 PM meeting...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom