If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
The Heller ruling is absolutely not going to save us and should absolutely not be relied upon to do so.
The site reads that obama/biden support renewing the AWB and making it permanent. The AWB that they are talking about (No, not the one in congress right now because they can't be talking about renewing something that doesn't exist.) didn't ban ARs. It just neutered them and their attachments, accessories, and the like. It meant no mags with 10 round capacity, etc (I'm sure you are well versed in what the AWB meant). All of that seems to be okay acording to the Heller ruling and restrictions that justice Scalia's statement allows for. The Heller ruling is absolutely not going to save us and should absolutely not be relied upon to do so.
SO AGAIN when do we march TALK CHEAP So lets march
Move to New Hamp.... uhhhhhhh
I tossed up the idea for a march on Beacon Hill and we never got anywhere, let alone DC.
I tossed up the idea for a march on Beacon Hill and we never got anywhere, let alone DC.
So who here will take to a letter writing campaign, (not E-mail)? Who here will go door to door and organize? Who here will put pressure on elected officials, (local, state and federal)? Who here will put pressure on the NRA to not sit idly by again? Who here will take to the streets if need be - march on Beacon Hill, march on Washington? Who here will make their voices heard beyond the confines of your keyboard? Who here will at last prioritize liberty above a soccer game, or getting the time off work? Who here is willing to sacrifice?
My fear is that crime will go up in '09, simply due to a poor economy.
I have to say my heart just dropped.
What he supports and what he pushes for may be two different things. At one point, I believe W. said that he supported the then-existing assault weapons ban.
I certainly agree that Obama is a gun banner, but I think he's got bigger fish to fry at the moment.
so in mass we still live under the AWB that sunsetted federally. So when they put it back in federally NOTHING CHANGES HERE, we just now have company in our misery.
I don't see what the gun show loophole is unless they are talking about the ability in some states to buy long guns face to face with no paperwork filed federally. There is not one in mass so once again nothing changes here.
How about the fact that the rest of the country will now be looking for pre-ban items such as mags. You think this stuff is expensive now. Lets see what happens to prices if he gets his way
so in mass we still live under the AWB that sunsetted federally. So when they put it back in federally NOTHING CHANGES HERE, we just now have company in our misery.
Sorry to say...but I think we are all too late!!
The gun-banner claim that the Tiahrt Amendment prevents law enforcement access to BATF trace data is a bald-faced lie, even worse than the so-called "gun show loophole" mis-direction. The information is already available to federal, state, and local agencies "in connection with and for use in a bona fide criminal investigation or prosecution" or for use in administrative actions by BATFE. The Amendment tries to block access to the information by federal and state AGs and others government agencies for using in actions like suing gun manufacturers, harassment of FFLs by state and local agencies, inventorying of gun ownership for regulatory or confiscatory purposes, and who know what else they can dream up.Police access to gun owner data. I don't know how I feel about this. I just always assumed once the FA-10 form was filed, the whole freakin state probably has access to it.
so in mass we still live under the AWB that sunsetted federally. So when they put it back in federally NOTHING CHANGES HERE, we just now have company in our misery.
At least now we can get pre-ban mags for cheap. If the entire country went back under the shadow of an AWB, the rest of Free America would be scrambling to find them as well, so there would be much less availability and the cost would be much higher.
I am noticing that the posts here have more to do with the cost of items rather than our rights. Are we fighting to protect our wallets or our freedoms. I cannot tell from some of the posts here.
I am noticing that the posts here have more to do with the cost of items rather than our rights. Are we fighting to protect our wallets or our freedoms. I cannot tell from some of the posts here.
The problem with that viewpoint is that when he can't land the big ones - he will go for the smaller ones that he can land. Just to say he was successful when he went fishing.
Here's Obama saying he "won't take your shotgun away. Won't take your rifle away. Won't take your handgun away"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBHkMADXnOw&NR=1
Exactly my concern. There is little the government can do that will really improve the economy for the long term. But they're going to want to look like they're doing something "good." The same mentality is what has given us most of the stupid gun laws in Massachusetts.
When Benito Mussolini was criticized for destroying democracy in Italy with his Fascist government, some people defended him by saying "Well, at least he made the trains run on time."
I fear we'll be hearing a lot of similar comments over the next four years.