The the law does state ‘locked case or other secure container’, secure being the undefined/ambiguous term and ‘or other’ inferring that term also applies to ‘locked case’.
Somewhere I’ve run across some pretty specific jury instructions that say something along the lines of ‘secure’ means an average person can’t access the contents using typical TOOLS.
Which in practical terms rules out about any typical gun case I can think of, hard, soft or otherwise
“Secured adequately to deter all but the most persistent person from gaining access”
Also, read Commonwealth v Reyes:
Commonwealth v. Reyes
Defendant had a license permitting him to carry a firearm for all lawful purposes. After driving to work one day, Defendant attempted to obtain a gun locker key for the storage of his firearm during his work shift, but all the lockers were full. Consequently, Defendant placed his gun in his...
law.justia.com
Statutory and regulatory references to acceptable containers include safes, [FN8] weapon boxes, [FN9] locked cabinets, [FN10] gun cases, [FN11] lock boxes, and locked trunks of vehicles. [FN12] A leading secondary source, Law Enforcement Guide to Firearm Law (20th ed.2012), published by the Municipal Police Institute, Inc., [FN13] states that a securely locked container can include a soft gun case secured with a padlock, "as well as an expensive gun safe," and that even "glass front furniture style gun cabinets are acceptable providing that they are capable of being locked." Id. at 93. [FN14]
In this regard, we agree with the Appeals Court that, as a general proposition, to be secure, "guns [must] be maintained in locked containers in a way that will deter all but the most persistent from gaining access." Commonwealth v. Parzick, supra (door lock that was easily defeatable by using "bobby pin" did not prevent access to unauthorized persons other than owner and therefore was "not secure").
Last edited: