Then what do you suggest that is comparable to the Ruger MAX
Pretty much anything else it's size, or nearly it's size.
There is a reason it is a $300 gun, and damn near everything else is a $500 gun, and it's not because Ruger lives with lower profit margins. It is because it is cheaply made with cheap parts. Honestly. Ruger didn't unlock some secret to manufacturing that no one else has figured out, and chose to pass those savings on to the consumer.
I personally think .380 is an anemic round and am not comfortable carrying it. Maybe as a back up gun. And no, I don't want to get shot with one.
Did you want it specifically as a pocket pistol? Ankle Holster? Back up gun or primary? Why 380?
If you are thinking 380 because of recoil, small 380's usually suck to shoot. A 365 is just a little bit bigger with similar felt recoil when shooting the right ammo.
Pocket pistol, ankle holster back up gun, it's tough to beat the PM9. Very accurate and reliable and having the same caliber as your primary makes a lot of sense.
Aside from 380 being under powered, 9mm is cheaper, much more readily available, has many more varieties to choose from and is much more effective.
If racking a slide was an issue for me, I would probably carry a small revolver in 38special/357. And 38special +P is a decent round.
All of these decisions are about compromise. I would rather carry a bit heavier gun with a larger caliber. Some people would not. The PM9 is smaller than the Max, but it's heavier with less capacity. Compromise. I will carry a spare magazine.
At the end of the day, a Glock 43 is a waaaay better gun than both of them, but it's a little bigger, another compromise.
But I won't buy a poorly manufactured gun to save less than what I spend in a couple of range trips.
But these are my opinions, and the reasons why. You will have different criteria and compromises you are willing to make.