LET'S GOOOOOOOOOO!!None of us remember it....but 1861 was a fairly polarized year in US history if I remember right.
Well.....I take that back one eyed Jack may remember it.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
LET'S GOOOOOOOOOO!!None of us remember it....but 1861 was a fairly polarized year in US history if I remember right.
Well.....I take that back one eyed Jack may remember it.
This is why licensing of a right guaranteed in the very text of the Constitution is insane.
Want to deny purchases to prohibited persons? Fine. Still don’t need licenses.
Judge: "How do you plead?"I wonder how that would work in court.
The whole fact that there is costs and permits for a constitutional right is rediculous on the face of the first amendment. There is no license for free speech.No. I don't even think that a suit regarding the changes in the law is particularly viable. States have the right to set the conditions for issuing permits as long as they don't violate Bruen. The only thing that MIGHT be violative is the list of "suitability" criteria.
When my son lived in AL, the CCW permit had to be renewed every year. Of course it took all of five minutes at the courthouse and cost $35.00. PA is $20.00 for five years. NH I think is $10.00 for residents, but I forget the term.
FIFY...I bet he's the kind of dick that microwaves fish in Teacher's Lounge microwave...
Amirite there, Broc?
As I stated in my earlier post, PD's can't be happy with this bill. Did the butthurt Leftists consider the extra work PD's will have to do and the cost? Of course not. The COP's better be calling their State Senators and reading them the riot act.When did I say they didn't?
The fact remains that they're the only real hope for modifying this legislation, and not because they care about We The People: they care about their own inconvenience, and the hit their schedule and budget will take when they have to schedule all these interviews and process the apps.
I couldn't give a shit less about the wellbeing of cops, in general, but if we can use them to modify this ridiculous bill, we should.
Lol, they literally give zero f*cks about the increase in workload, they just won’t do it. They will just proceed business as usual and meet with maybe 1 person a day and then say they are far too busy for more than that.As I stated in my earlier post, PD's can't be happy with this bill. Did the butthurt Leftists consider the extra work PD's will have to do and the cost? Of course not. The COP's better be calling their State Senators and reading them the riot act.
Then they will be getting many phone calls from State Reps and citizens angry at the delay. It will make their lives very uncomfortable, and they know it which they won't like.Lol, they literally give zero f*cks about the increase in workload, they just won’t do it. They will just proceed business as usual and meet with maybe 1 person a day and then say they are far too busy for more than that.
The anti towns will say, "Fine, since the interviews have gone way up, your interview is now scheduled for next never."Lol, they literally give zero f*cks about the increase in workload, they just won’t do it. They will just proceed business as usual and meet with maybe 1 person a day and then say they are far too busy for more than that.
Well, I expire in less than 2 years, so guess what? I think I better get in line now for my interrogation. I don't want to be late.It won't be challenged directly as NY/CA have a lot more $ and stupidity behind them to be challenged. What IS a problem is: Undue burden for a constitutional right. Wait until CHEOPS - god of lazy workers is backed up so much that you apply 3 months before license expiration and you don't get it for 6 months after. When will that be? Probably within 4 years. But the CA/NY thing will be far sooner and will push the SC to clarify the "sit the F down and shut hte F up" nature of Bruen.
Yeah, I think there is some rule where you can't use the "high cost + crazy hassle = racism" thang unless you are a DimocRAT.They don't care if it's racist against those blacks. They'll just trot out some of the pet "community activists" to tell everyone how this will make black communities much safer.
Fees that roughly cover administrative costs of issuing the permit will hold up. If it takes 1-2 hours of time for the state, well, I bill my customers at $50-$100 an hour for labor so it kinda checks out even if it’s a stretch.No. I don't even think that a suit regarding the changes in the law is particularly viable. States have the right to set the conditions for issuing permits as long as they don't violate Bruen. The only thing that MIGHT be violative is the list of "suitability" criteria.
When my son lived in AL, the CCW permit had to be renewed every year. Of course it took all of five minutes at the courthouse and cost $35.00. PA is $20.00 for five years. NH I think is $10.00 for residents, but I forget the term.
The amendment passed states that LTCs issued prior to enactment of the law are valid until the expiration date they were given when issued.
Then they will be getting many phone calls from State Reps and citizens angry at the delay. It will make their lives very uncomfortable, and they know it which they won't like.
His bio reads: "He is one of the leading advocates of civil rights and civil liberties issues..."Here is the guy you can thank for adding the amendment to a totally random bill (language provided by some anti-2a group I’m sure). It really doesn’t matter who added the amendment, they do it all the time to grab cash for their pet projects. The anti-2a groups will be stuffing the coffers of all the dems to get more of these surprises thrown in over the next few weeks to be sure.
Representative Michael S. Day
malegislature.gov
True, but when that does inevitably get abused, that too should be a quick and easy post-Bruen lawsuit.Not that all the above isn't important, but these new hurdles are not the most asinine aspects of this proposed change to licensing. Suitability is what needs to be focused on.
Hmmm, I'm surprised the anti's allowed this provision to be included. It's time to start calling, emailing your Senators and raising hell. No reply from my Rep. Natalie Higgins which was expected so it on to Senator Cronin. I expect an email from GOAL with the bill number when it reaches the Senate.The amendment passed states that LTCs issued prior to enactment of the law are valid until the expiration date they were given when issued.
True, but when that does inevitably get abused, that too should be a quick and easy post-Bruen lawsuit.
FFS, No, it DOES NOT checkout. We already pay taxes to cover administrative budgets!!!!!Fees that roughly cover administrative costs of issuing the permit will hold up. If it takes 1-2 hours of time for the state, well, I bill my customers at $50-$100 an hour for labor so it kinda checks out even if it’s a stretch.
“Relative to the norm in gun cases in the First District.”Define quick and easy. We've seen both the district and circuit federal courts in the Northeast ignore Heller and other SCOTUS 2A decisions.
the local cops could give two shts , its more revenue and more abuse for those who want a permission slip to excercise a fn right. remember when the cops pulled the pandemic shit saying it wasn't safe for fingerprints, interviews, sorry no new lic, no renewels, we aren't responding to certain calls, etc....im all for defunding the police when they abuse us, and all supporting those cops that say FU to this BS, sadly there are not any who do.maybe all you in MA should start calling your local CoPs and letting them know their workload is about to go up for no good reason. Then the CoPs can call the legislators and pressure them to stop this nonsense
For S&G's, I looked her up...literally every bill she has submitted (without fail) is proof she is the consummate SJW...I'm going to go out on the proverbial limb and guess she'll vote in the affirmative.Just sent an email to my Rep. Natalie Higgins. I don't expect a reply and I expect her to vote yes because she's a good little apparatchik. I told her to expect massive lawsuits if this outrageous bill becomes law. Hmm, I wonder where the COP Association is on this, I'm sure they wouldn't be happy with 3 yr licenses and mandatory interviews for every renewal.
I think some of the language changes would pass under regular order. The chiefs and non-blindly partisan lawyers would take issue with the 3 year bullshit and attempts to unlawfully continue suitably in defiance of SCOTUS resulting in more changes to the language.If there was a month left in session, then I'd assume this to be a done deal, but given the time crunch it's entirely possible that the clock runs out and they have to try again next session, at which point it will definitely pass.
but he doesn't say constitutional rightsHis bio reads: "He is one of the leading advocates of civil rights and civil liberties issues..."
Thus proving that the 2A is still a right of the second class.Fees that roughly cover administrative costs of issuing the permit will hold up. If it takes 1-2 hours of time for the state, well, I bill my customers at $50-$100 an hour for labor so it kinda checks out even if it’s a stretch.
He may be basing his position off of US v. Logan which the Feds claim establishes that although gun ownership is a right, it is not a civil right. I would expect him to stand up for a persons right to vote, hold public office and serve on a jury.but he doesn't say constitutional rights
Correct, she never even replies to my emails. She's a total POS, far left Dem! I don't call her office because I know it will just end up in a pissing contest.For S&G's, I looked her up...literally every bill she has submitted (without fail) is proof she is the consummate SJW...I'm going to go out on the proverbial limb and guess she'll vote in the affirmative.
Representative Natalie M. Higgins
malegislature.gov