Rayla Campbell (R) for Sec of State

look at any libs on your local board of selectmen and I can guarantee that they will be using all of the current catch phrases like “settled science.” I sometimes think about going undercover as a some lib just to see if there is an actual playbook that gets passed around because the language is always the same phrasing, and I know the morons in my town aren’t coming up with it on their own.
Email lists, PowerPoint, and workshops on what the cause and lexicon du jour is.
 
Kennedy and Kerry weren’t, but they didn’t need to be. The party would tell them what to think and they would change their tune to stay in power.

look at any libs on your local board of selectmen and I can guarantee that they will be using all of the current catch phrases like “settled science.” I sometimes think about going undercover as a some lib just to see if there is an actual playbook that gets passed around because the language is always the same phrasing, and I know the morons in my town aren’t coming up with it on their own.

Lol both of them had enough seniority they didn't have to listen. Seniority is a BFD in the senate. No dem is going to dump a Kennedy or Schumer for an AOC. Hell Swinestein is ancient and 150% senile and they can't get rid of her. That's why a lot of senators just about die in office.
 
People need to understand the best you’ll get in Massachusetts is a Scott brown or Charlie baker type. Anyone with delusions of a Ted Cruz, DeSantis, Jeff deihl type coming within 15% of winning in Massachusetts needs psychological help.

Some on this board say it’s because of fraud a deihl can’t win. That’s insane. Drive around inside 495, where the bulk of MA population is and you’ll see sizable numbers of rainbow flags, blm signs, etc. those people are not voting for deihl. Massachusetts is a liberal state like Alabama is a conservative state. It’s not fraud, it’s just a lot of crazy liberals.

I agree it’s getting worse. The working class union democrats are being replaced by the woke dems. Markey ran hard left in the dem 2020 primary against joe Kennedy and crushed him. He campaigned with AOC and ran hard left against a Kennedy in Massachusetts and it wasn’t even close. And markey isn’t some gifted politician, he just had smart staffers who understand where the dem base is.
I agree with everything you said here except the Kennedy part. I think the Kennedy dynasty may have worn out its welcome. I think many people voted for Malarky because they didn't want to see another self entitled Kennedy in the Senate.
 
I agree with everything you said here except the Kennedy part. I think the Kennedy dynasty may have worn out its welcome. I think many people voted for Malarky because they didn't want to see another self entitled Kennedy in the Senate.

Remember, they competed in the democrat primary, not the general election. The Kennedy name is still a huge asset in the dem party in Massachusetts. Joe Kennedy the 2nd and 3rd definitely don’t have the cachet of fat boy but markey has none either.

Markey ran a hard left campaign from day one, he went to the extreme across the board and was way to Kennedy’s left. That’s why the democrat primary voters went so big for markey.
 
She's going straight into a brick wall, but she has my high respect for the desire to drive herself straight into a brick wall. Good for her, at least somebody is fighting.
 
Lol both of them had enough seniority they didn't have to listen. Seniority is a BFD in the senate. No dem is going to dump a Kennedy or Schumer for an AOC. Hell Swinestein is ancient and 150% senile and they can't get rid of her. That's why a lot of senators just about die in office.
But Smucky Schumer is terrified Sandy Cortez will challenge him for his Senate seat. That's why he bows to the Leftist agenda pushed by the mean girls.
 
Does anyone know her actual position on MA gun laws and past AG practices thereto (ex. using threats and demand letters to extort gun shop compliance with restrictive interpretations of gun laws and regulations)?
 
Does anyone know her actual position on MA gun laws and past AG practices thereto (ex. using threats and demand letters to extort gun shop compliance with restrictive interpretations of gun laws and regulations)?

Are you perchance confusing her with Andrea Campbell, basically the anti gun heir apparent to the AG? (once our shit AG becomes governor, that is).

two different people

Rayla is a pretty hard charging conservative, and I think she is running for SecState because of the level of screwball shit she had to go through to get on ballots for this or
that.
 
While she is enthusiastic and her heart is in the right place, she doesn't come across professionally and doesn't have a competent organized campaign team.

If you are going to be MA's version of MTG you need to be as organized and competent as MTG and she isn't. The loud and proud personality has to be backed up by competence and she hasn't been able to demonstrate it in her previous campaigns.

I like Rayla Campbell, but honestly none of this matters because the bulk of the MA electorate is effectively so far left now it makes it difficult (read, nearly impossible) to elect people for statewide office that are even 1% conservative. The days of shitty boomer fake independents desiring to bouy the democrats with a 50% republican counterbalance are long gone. The people who used to push that philosphy are long gone or they retired and moved out of this shithole for places like FL and other warm places. (these people were never great, but they did manage to keep dems from getting that last 20% so to speak. )

And even in smaller races where there are still republicans the moonbats are running around tyring to gerrymander the shit out of those too. (a cluster of districts in the southcoast and central/western MA etc are still red but they are desperately trying to figure out how to f*** those up.

These people want revenue expansion and the only way they get that is by snuffing out ALL the opposing voices. They dont want the $$$$ committees to have a single republican or moderate democrat on them to f*** up their plans.

Also if you look real closely moderate dems are fleeing too. Like for example in nocentma we had Jen Flanagan. She was a socialist-lite but paid attention to constituents on issues like
guns and so on, and was moderate on a lot of things. She quite obviously punched out and went for the cush job at the cannabis commission because she could see the writing on the wall even several years ago. The dems have been systematically f***ing up/harassing moderate dems in their ranks.
 
"Also if you look real closely moderate dems are fleeing too. Like for example in nocentma we had Jen Flanagan. She was a socialist-lite but paid attention to constituents on issues like
guns and so on, and was moderate on a lot of things. She quite obviously punched out and went for the cush job at the cannabis commission because she could see the writing on the wall even several years ago. The dems have been systematically f***ing up/harassing moderate dems in their ranks."

Yup, I liked Jen, talked to her a few times and she was A rated by GOAL if I remember correctly. The Ballot 1 question is typical, even thou the State has a budget surplus we have to watch these whining commercials with a teacher and Union Construction worker telling us they need Millionaire's to pay more taxes for roads and schools. I'd love to confront that phony Construction worker and ask him who pays him. The Leftist sheeple never have enough and will never learn.
 
Are you perchance confusing her with Andrea Campbell, basically the anti gun heir apparent to the AG? (once our shit AG becomes governor, that is).

two different people

Rayla is a pretty hard charging conservative, and I think she is running for SecState because of the level of screwball shit she had to go through to get on ballots for this or
that.
Not confusing her with anyone. It's a honest question. I went looking for a statement on her position(s) on gun control and couldn't find anything. Of course all the media reports I could find were smearing her as a hot-headed, crazy, radical-righty without any actual facts. But her web site was also very light on actual position statements. I trust no one given the squishy nature of many (most?) "Republican" politicians in MA.
 
Not confusing her with anyone. It's a honest question. I went looking for a statement on her position(s) on gun control and couldn't find anything. Of course all the media reports I could find were smearing her as a hot-headed, crazy, radical-righty without any actual facts. But her web site was also very light on actual position statements. I trust no one given the squishy nature of many (most?) "Republican" politicians in MA.

Unfortunately none of this matters anyways because she has about .002% chance of winning, this state is done. :(
 
Not confusing her with anyone. It's a honest question. I went looking for a statement on her position(s) on gun control and couldn't find anything. Of course all the media reports I could find were smearing her as a hot-headed, crazy, radical-righty without any actual facts. But her web site was also very light on actual position statements. I trust no one given the squishy nature of many (most?) "Republican" politicians in MA.
The Sec. of State job is basically ensuring fair elections, voter registration, etc.

They have nothing to do with gun control or taxes and shouldn't be posting any positions on those issues, period.
 
The Sec. of State job is basically ensuring fair elections, voter registration, etc.

They have nothing to do with gun control or taxes and shouldn't be posting any positions on those issues, period.
Thanks. Got the AG and Sec State offices mixed up. Hopefully she's rolling back all the DemocRat voter fraud enablement policies and practices.
 
Back
Top Bottom