If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Shitty clone (not a real EOtech) holographic on the left.What is the difference between these two?
View attachment 977684
Cheap and cheaper.What is the difference between these two?
View attachment 977684
Any functional difference though between the two styles? Forget the brands. Pretend they are both reliable. Is one preferred for a handgun and the other for a shotgun/AR?The one on the left is a shitty EOtech clone. Airsoft worthy
The one on the right is a Leupold. It’s quality. Prob a 1x dot.
Let's be real here. An AR platform rifle in 5.56 doesn't have enough recoil to 'destroy an optic', not even a shitty Temu-level Chinese airsoft one. That said, the Sightmark likely doesn't shift its zero with temperature changes like a "Real EOTech" does.Shitty clone (not a real EOtech) holographic on the left.
And a quality emitter (red) dot on the right.
Neither of the above are open emitters.The 2 main differences that I know of is open emitter and closed emitter. The open emitter is usually smaller but snow or lint can block the emitter from projecting on the glass where as closed emitter can't have foreign objects block the light but are bulkier and heavier
I'm not commenting on those 2 I'm speaking generally the differences with red dotsNeither of the above are open emitters.
Let's be real here. An AR platform rifle in 5.56 doesn't have enough recoil to 'destroy an optic', not even a shitty Temu-level Chinese airsoft one. That said, the Sightmark likely doesn't shift its zero with temperature changes like a "Real EOTech" does.
Understood, but that was not a question above and let’s not add to the discussion.I'm not commenting on those 2 I'm speaking generally the differences with red dots
Thinking of putting one on my 12 gauge auto for turkey. We have one my wife's new 410 and it's really nice, at least when testing loads.What are you looking to do? Let’s start there.
We can help better if we know what you want to do with it.
Thinking of putting one on my 12 gauge auto for turkey. We have one my wife's new 410 and it's really nice, at least when testing loads.
Cheap clones typically do not survive recoil for long. Usually a dozen of shots kills them.Any functional difference though between the two styles? Forget the brands. Pretend they are both reliable. Is one preferred for a handgun and the other for a shotgun/AR?
Over time, technology advances and things get easier and much much cheaper to produce - and red dots/optics are no exception. Sure, a CVLife or a Cyelee red dot today isn't going to have the same legendary bomb-proof reputation as an Aimpoint CompM4. Enough youtube 'torture tests' have shown they do survive pretty nasty drops onto hard ground, optic first.Cheap clones typically do not survive recoil for long. Usually a dozen of shots kills them.
That is why punty was just an odd exception.
The one on the left is much more susceptible to being compromised by debris. Like a bit of snow blocking the emitter.Any functional difference though between the two styles? Forget the brands. Pretend they are both reliable. Is one preferred for a handgun and the other for a shotgun/AR?
I've got an ACRO p2 on my shotty.Thinking of putting one on my 12 gauge auto for turkey. We have one my wife's new 410 and it's really nice, at least when testing loads.
One is shaped boxy and one is shaped tubeyWhat is the difference between these two?
View attachment 977684
Um, no. The Eotech clone is not an open emitter.The one on the left is much more susceptible to being compromised by debris. Like a bit of snow blocking the emitter.
The Sightmark shown is an open emitter which is why everyone is confused about what to compare.Um, no. The Eotech clone is not an open emitter.
Ive never had an expensive red dot. They have all survived plenty of 12 gauge recoil without problems...before I went to a scope on the shotgun.Cheap clones typically do not survive recoil for long. Usually a dozen of shots kills them.
That is why pinty was just an odd exception.
Ah, I stand corrected. Looking at it more closely, you are correct. It is styled to look like an EOTECH, but is an open emitter. EOTECHs are not open emitters.The Sightmark shown is an open emitter which is why everyone is confused about what to compare.
I don't trust ade for shit. I knew that going into it,but still tried anyways.Let's be real here. An AR platform rifle in 5.56 doesn't have enough recoil to 'destroy an optic', not even a shitty Temu-level Chinese airsoft one. That said, the Sightmark likely doesn't shift its zero with temperature changes like a "Real EOTech" does.
This is the answer.The Sig Romeo 5 (now Gen II) is awesome for the price. I have half a dozen Aimpoint H-1/T-1/T-2 and a few of the Romeo 5’s of both generations.
![]()
Sig Sauer ROMEO5 Gen II 1x20mm Red or Green Dot Sight from - $120 (Free S/H)
Refreshed with a bold new look, the next generation of SIG SAUERgun.deals
Rant on...Sure, a CVLife or a Cyelee red dot today isn't going to have the same legendary bomb-proof reputation as an Aimpoint CompM4. Enough youtube 'torture tests' have shown they do survive pretty nasty drops onto hard ground, optic first.