• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

The History and travels of this Portuguese contract, Rhodesian used FAL

Joined
Aug 28, 2005
Messages
1,253
Likes
609
Location
My house and gun shop in NH
Feedback: 42 / 0 / 0
History and travels of this Portuguese contract, Rhodesian used FAL

From what I have read and info I have gathered this I believe is the history and travels of this post sample FAL that I got. I was looking around on Gunbroker and saw this post sample FAL for sale for a very good price. It only had 2 pictures and they weren’t very good
pix315923759.jpg

pix690837835.jpg


This was the description

FN FAL Full Auto .308 .
Overall length: 41.5 inches
Barrel length: 21"
UTG Picatinny Quad rail forearm
Four magazines included - Uses standard FAL mags

SN indicates this was built from an Rhodesian Army FAL imported as a kit. Exteriors shows wear, functions well, bore is bright.

Not much to go on. I contacted the seller and asked if it shoot and works good. They said yes so, I took a chance and bought the gun. The ATF was pretty quick and approved the form 3 in a few days and I had the gun about a week later.

After looking at it, it didn’t seem to me that this was a kit-built gun. I tracked back the gun 4 owners to who I believe was the importer of the FAL. I also put some pictures on some forums to see if I could gather some history on the gun. I didn’t know to much about FAL’s. I also looked online and here is what I think is the history of this gun.

The Portuguese acquired their FAL’s in 1961 designated as the m/962.
20220424_113302.jpg


This is what it would have looked like when it was delivered to Portugal.
Right side view.jpeg


So, this gun was made between 1961-1968, you can tell this by the stampings on the gun
20220504_180859.jpg


The "*M" mark indicates the name of the Belgian Controller of Proof, which Scorpion Maurice from 1959 until 1968.
The mark next to that is the Liege, Belgium proof mark, called Le Perron, used to indicate inspection or proof of breeching system.

I believe that the “C” and the # 4 in this picture indicates that the gun was made in 1964. The "C" was a Belgian proof mark for 1964.
20220504_181001.jpg


So, between 1964 and 1974 the FAL made its way with the Portuguese commandos to Africa, and they did their thing there. In April of 1974 Portugal was pretty much done with Africa. From what I have found there was an Auction of a lot of the Portuguese small arms in late 1975 and South Africa was the winner of that auction.

So, this FAL made it’s way to South Africa where it was rebuilt with a new SA barrel that was numbers matched to the original FN receiver #.
20220422_211944.jpg

20220422_180315.jpg


I believe it also got a South African unnumbered lower.
20220424_103736.jpg



So probably somewhere between 1976-1979 it made its way to Rhodesia to fight in that war too.
20220422_180244.jpg


After Rhodesia became Zimbabwe, I think the FAL was refreshed up again with a used bolt, bolt carrier and some other little pieces because I have found some green paint in the trigger guard, sling swivel, break open latch and the thing that hold the pivot pin in place.
20220424_105221.jpg

20220422_180308.jpg


The bolt and bolt carrier where from other RA guns. The bolt carrier RA number was cruelty remarked.
20220424_112502.jpg

20220424_112119.jpg




Then in probably the mid 1990’s the FAL was imported to the USA along with the Rhodesian FAL’s by Century Arms. Looks like Century turned most of them into parts kits. I emailed Century to see if they could tell me anything about this gun and their response was

" Thank you for the inquiry regarding the history of your firearm. We offer a richly diverse mix of products, unfortunately, we do not create historical profiles on firearms, nor do we employ any historians. The allure of firearm collecting includes learning the history from various open sources and creating your own history while safely using your acquisition. "

Then it was sold to Bob Bowman of Bowman Arms in I think the late 1990’s. I emailed him, and he said that he got it from Century 25ish years ago.

Then it was sold to a police officer in TX that also had his SOT in maybe 2005-2006. I talked to him on the phone, and he said that when he got it, it didn’t have a carry handle on it. He put one on and used the rifle as his duty gun. He also said that he had gotten a second FAL that was a sequential serial number to this gun. When he gave up his SOT the ATF came and took the second gun and all of his other post samples. In 2007 he sold it to a place in MN that used the gun as a rental gun. They were dropping their SOT and put the rifle on Gunbroker and that’s where I got it from. I changed out the ugly “tactical” handguard that was on the gun to a DSA one
20220423_180630.jpg


It seems like this gun has gone through quite a lot and has changed it’s look from how it came out of the factory. I wonder what parts are still with the gun that it came with from the factory with other than the receiver? I thought it was kind of neat that one could trace the history of a gun through the stampings on the gun and talking to the former owners.
 

Attachments

  • 20220424_113302.jpg
    20220424_113302.jpg
    168 KB · Views: 1
I. Love. This. Thread.

Have you tried sourcing a wooden handguard? It'd be great to put it back to its original look, though as I stated in your other thread removing that tacticool POS that was on there before is already about a 500% improvement.
 
I. Love. This. Thread.

Have you tried sourcing a wooden handguard? It'd be great to put it back to its original look, though as I stated in your other thread removing that tacticool POS that was on there before is already about a 500% improvement.
The question is do you try and get it back to original factory condition, if you do that then it losses a lot of it history. I would probably try and find a beat up South African type of hand guard because that's probably what it would have ended up with when it got rebuilt.
 
The question is do you try and get it back to original factory condition, if you do that then it losses a lot of it history. I would probably try and find a beat up South African type of hand guard because that's probably what it would have ended up with when it got rebuilt.
Oh, absolutely. I’m all in favor of finding beat-up wood.

Here’s mine, an Aussie L1A1 clone. I think it’s beautiful. 98B129EF-A0F5-4326-AD04-51934F4D848C.jpeg
 
I think I mentioned this in your other thread - I'm not sure the rifle was accepted into Zimbabwean service. Post-1980, Zimbabwe marked the rifles with a "ZA" prefix and they sometimes crossed out the "RA" Rhodesian Army prefix. The rifle could've been doing any number of things in Zimbabwe besides being an army rifle, such as a police rifle, a private security rifle, or a personal rifle.

Rhodesian doctrine was to paint all long guns in the green/brown/yellow vehicle paint approximately during 1975, '76, to 1979. The Zimbabwean military kept the painted guns as they were but didn't actively paint new guns in the vehicle paint. Further, Zimbabwe was (a) incapable of en masse refurbishing rifles themselves; and (b) a Maoist, Marxist state with military aid from various CommBloc countries, but primarily the PRC.

Otherwise, yeah, about what we figured. My vote is to leave the gun as it is and enjoy it!
 
Awesome write up! Going through your postings on falfiles as well, some serious knowledge there. Perfect way to pass the time while sick on memorial day weekend, thanks!
 
Back
Top Bottom