If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
More info.
Yea that went well for Anthony he spent a fortune having perini build a pile and timber railway for her then ballast the in side so she wouldn't float so they thought. Surge tide in blizzard of 78 lifted her it sat down in railway on its side and ripped it open and it sank. I broke up and removed the wreck a few years back for another small fortune. For the new owners of the property. They have a built life expectancy after that they are a issue that needs constant attention. If they are an issue they should be repaired or cut up so no has to risk there life trying to save them. I will cut them up free of charge line them upnot sure why these ships need to "float" in retirement?
There used to be a ship in boston harbor, next to anthonys rest,
View attachment 604808
it sat on concrete blocks. The SS Peter Stuyvesant.
Did fine until the blizzard of 78
Yea that went well for Anthony he spent a fortune having perini build a pile and timber railway for her then ballast the in side so she wouldn't float so they thought. Surge tide in blizzard of 78 lifted her it sat down in railway on its side and ripped it open and it sank. I broke up and removed the wreck a few years back for another small fortune. For the new owners of the property. They have a built life expectancy after that they are a issue that needs constant attention. If they are an issue they should be repaired or cut up so no has to risk there life trying to save them. I will cut them up free of charge line them up
There’s a lot of discussion on Museum Ship groups. And it should be noted the U.S. has, by far, the most museum ships in the world and navy buffs come from all over the world to visit them.So if all it took was to send a few divers down to plug holes from the outside, then why did everyone wait until this ship is practically submerged to do this now? Couldn't they have sent them down last month? What am I missing?
They were war machines not expected to last a lifetime.
I think they produced some 175 or there about Fletcher class Destroyers in a short 4 year span. They were war machines not expected to last a lifetime. That is just one class of ships. Think of that.
![]()
Fletcher-class destroyer - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
...therein lies the problem...
The Fletcher class was a class of destroyers built by the United States during World War II. The class was designed in 1939, as a result of dissatisfaction with the earlier destroyer leader types of the Porter and Somers classes. Some went on to serve during the Korean War and into the Vietnam War.[3]
The United States Navy commissioned 175 Fletcher-class destroyers between 1942 and 1944, more than any other destroyer class, and the design was generally regarded as highly successful. The Fletchers had a design speed of 38 knots (70 km/h; 44 mph) and a principal armament of five 5-inch (130 mm) guns in single mounts with ten 21-inch (530 mm) torpedo tubes in two quintuple centerline mounts.[4] The Allen M. Sumner and Gearing classes were Fletcher derivatives.
The long-range Fletcher-class ships performed every task asked of a destroyer, from anti-submarine warfare and anti-aircraft warfare to surface action.[5] They could cover the vast distances required by fleet actions in the Pacific and served almost exclusively in the Pacific Theater of Operations during World War II, during which they accounted for 29 Imperial Japanese Navy submarines sunk.[5][failed verification] In a massive effort, the Fletchers were built by shipyards across the United States and, after World War II ended, 11 were sold to countries that they had been built to fight against: Italy, Germany, and Japan, as well as other countries, where they had even longer, distinguished careers. Three have been preserved as museum ships in the U.S. and one in Greece.
Not really a problem.
The "problem" I'm referring to is the thread title, not the WWII production numbers.
Then you need to take that up with the OP.
I'll just warn you, I took it up with him and he told me to:
"Bugger off, mate!"
You misunderstand.
The thin metal caused rapid production, but it also caused problems when these vessels are in the water for 70 years.
Maybe the holes weren’t there last month?So if all it took was to send a few divers down to plug holes from the outside, then why did everyone wait until this ship is practically submerged to do this now? Couldn't they have sent them down last month? What am I missing?
Maybe the holes weren’t there last month?
Maybe the holes weren’t there last month?
Latest information: