We FINALLY get the law that will help us!

Jeez, I'm a Fudd (complete with 1970's .38 revolver and remington 870) but this guy is retarded. I'm so glad I found this thread, it's almost as funny as the cat one.



OP is like the lady I saw in the toy store asking if it was legal to give a toy truck to 4 year old when the box says "5 and up".

Those who want "freedom" move to NH.

Maybe OP should move to NY, NJ or CA. Those states seem more to your taste.


Just for you I'm going to take the family for a walk down main street tonight. All of us will be legally CCWing, including my 12 and 16 year old kids.
 
go ahead, be a meanie, rub it in our noses, make us sooo jealous [rofl]
Jeez, I'm a Fudd (complete with 1970's .38 revolver and remington 870) but this guy is retarded. I'm so glad I found this thread, it's almost as funny as the cat one.



OP is like the lady I saw in the toy store asking if it was legal to give a toy truck to 4 year old when the box says "5 and up".

Those who want "freedom" move to NH.

Maybe OP should move to NY, NJ or CA. Those states seem more to your taste.


Just for you I'm going to take the family for a walk down main street tonight. All of us will be legally CCWing, including my 12 and 16 year old kids.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JCCFEkXLOc
 

How does this support your argument? The guy that got shot was providing live fire instruction....

I honestly can not believe how much you are missing the point here. The state is not pushing this mandate to help keep people safe or because they care about people. They are doing it to add an additional obstacle to becoming a licensed gun owner. Their hope is not to make people safe, it is to discourage people from trying to become gun owners.
If the state were really trying to increase gun safety, THEY would offer free training, by state police firearms instructors, at police ranges and provide free ammo, the firearm, targets and use of eye and ear protection, and offer it 5 days a week at many locations around the state. And if they included this live fire in the $100 application fee, did the background check and finger prints on the spot, and handed you your license when you completed the training, I would support it.
They would actually streamline the process and make it easier/ quicker to obtain your LTC, while making sure people had some minimal training, I would believe their intentions were good, but that is not what they want.
 
These kids shoot way better than most of those I see at the range. I've actually heard "you missed", "sometimes that happens". It's an indoor range and he was at 30' I guess I should be thankful all the shots went downrange.
I didn't have my regular glasses!
 
If the state were really trying to increase gun safety, THEY would offer free training, by state police firearms instructors, at police ranges and provide free ammo, the firearm, targets and use of eye and ear protection, and offer it 5 days a week at many locations around the state. And if they included this live fire in the $100 application fee, did the background check and finger prints on the spot, and handed you your license when you completed the training, I would support it.
you mean like this
Indiana
POSTED BY: THE REPORTER JULY 19, 2024
Organizations and communities are encouraged to apply for grants to support developing and expanding public rifle, handgun, shotgun, or archery ranges through the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Shooting Range Grant program.

or this (Finland)
 
When people say training should mandatory (and often compare it driving a car), I usually ask "What mass shooting, or any other thing on the news you hear/read about about firearms could have been helped with better training?". Driving a car is moving a deadly weapon (one of the deadliest man has created), typically among thousands of other people doing the same, possibly by a minor, often at great speed, while paying attention to dozens if not hundreds of rules of the road, and trying to figure out where you're going.
Carrying a gun is the equivalent of going back and forth in your driveway. It only matters if you pull the gun. It only matters if you leave the driveway with a car. Driving is not a right enumerated in the constitution.

When they say gun registration works, I ask what crimes have been solved or prevented by registration? They've been watching too much TV.

I'm 100% in favor of training, and most 2A people I've met are as well, what I am not in favor of is mandated training. It will add cost, delays, and as many have said serves only to add additional hurdles to being "granted" permission to a right you already you already have. And registration is just a bad thing waiting to happen
 
Last edited:
The OP is clearly a statist.

But I got lambasted some time ago because I stated there should not be any licensing or registration or restrictions on any firearms to include full auto.

Apparently I lean too far the other way.

Licensing, age restriction, registration, bans, limits and the like are all infringements on 2A.

I support none of these communist tactics aimed at disarming and criminalizing Americans.

OP is obviously a communist or worse….a democrat.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom