We FINALLY get the law that will help us!

Op so cucked he bit his own tongue off hanging from his belt in the closet while his wife handed in the rest of his gun.
 
Last edited:
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
The right is either there or it’s left.

No right is a subject for licensing. Once it’s licensed- it is a revocable privilege and nothing else.
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
Animated GIF
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
I'm drunk and carrying a gun. Should I pull it out and start shooting it? Thinking about it.
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
You do realize that, in mass now / these are gated as the same thing?/

Further, dozens of states going full con carry (no f***ing loicense required) are proof that the nation won't elt down without mandated training. The % of gun accidents vs guns sold is still insignificant.
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
How frightening any sort of freedom must be to you.
 
FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.

"Should." It "should" state what you want it to state.

Well, f*** off. It doesn't, statist.

I'm of older-school thinking on this. More safety training is not a bad thing.

Good lord, you moron, if you'd bothered reading literally any of the replies, you'd realize that everyone agrees that training is not a bad thing. Christ, you don't even realize what people have an issue with here.
 
I'm of older-school thinking on this. More safety training is not a bad thing.
God.. six f***ing pages in.. nobody disagrees with you on that..

it's state-mandated feel-good hoop-jumping cost-incurring bullshit that we have issues with.

6 f***ing pages and you don't get it.
 
"Should." It "should" state what you want it to state.

Well, f*** off. It doesn't, statist.



Good lord, you moron, if you'd bothered reading literally any of the replies, you'd realize that everyone agrees that training is not a bad thing. Christ, you don't even realize what people have an issue with here.
It may not be bad, but it's def gay.
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
Go back to DU. We dont like your commie shit here.
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
Ok subject
 
"...
Training
...Requires State Police to promulgate uniform training curriculum and standardized test for all new applicants for a license to carry or Firearm ID Card. Curriculum will include live firearm training, and disengagement training..."


Finally! A requirement that should have been there 50 years go.

Frak,
Let’s revisit.


Statist who thanks the state for state sponsored and state required training.

Next you’re gonna opine on how ASW is a good acronym and banning them will save the children.
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
Like many have said already... No one is saying training is bad but it should not be mandatory. It should only be strongly encouraged.

Like my previous example, you going to enforce that single mom with 2 jobs that she can't carry outside of her home to protect herself from crazy abusive ex hubby/bf, who just got out of jail, because she didn't pay for the live fire and the government permission slip???

Sorry.... but no. No way. Anything that the government/state tries to "enforce" on the 2nd amendment is all sh*t.
 
Like many have said already... No one is saying training is bad but it should not be mandatory. It should only be strongly encouraged.

Like my previous example, you going to enforce that single mom with 2 jobs that she can't carry outside of her home to protect herself from crazy abusive ex hubby/bf, who just got out of jail, because she didn't pay for the live fire and the government permission slip???

Sorry.... but no. No way. Anything that the government/state tries to "enforce" on the 2nd amendment is all sh*t.
Don't encourage on me bro. Training is gay and OP is retarded.
 
My OP was not about OWNERSHIP of a firearm, but about CCW. (Go look back at the OP, because many of you forgot, and are following the crazy-train of lemming thread-flow).

It should be required that you have live-fire training to CC.

FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
Why should the 2nd Amendment state that, when it doesn't?
Hint, the US Constitution does not grant a single right. It enumerates them to constrain government from restricting them.
 
It is ONE STEP CLOSER to them not taking away our ability to have guns, because our licensing laws were lacking.
That's not how rights work.


Yes. You should be licensed to carry your firearm in public only if you have demonstrated to the local "licensing authority", or to an instructor in that capacity, that you will not kill other peole in the process of discharging your firearm.

Why is this such a mental block for the MAGA here?

You holder-ons are short-sighted, And have obviously NEVER instructed in the state of Massachusetts.

Dumb mother-f***ers, you are going to RUIN our right to carry!
I'm a (former) basic safety instructor in MA.

Basic safety course is f***ing gay and so are you for bragging about teaching it.



FFS, the second amendment is broad, but it should also state that the right to bear your arms must be done COMPETENTLY.
But it doesn't state that, does it?
 
Back
Top Bottom