I've always felt that a single safe is a single point of failure and far too big a plum for a thief. What's easier to do when robbing a home? Stealing a PC/mac/tablet that can be bricked remotely or using whatever tools are in the home to gain entry to a safe? Who knows the safe might contain things other than guns such as jewelry, cash, valuables, stocks, etc. I go with the hidden in plain sight concept, but stashed, locked and only I have access. I even have a second safe in my primary residence that is completely hidden. "two is better than 1, and one is better than none". This way if by chance someone broke into the safe they might grab a few rifles, but they won't get everything. I know MA tried to put together a ballot initiative a few years ago mandating all guns locked into one safe and I said to liberals that's the stupidest idea in the history of stupid ideas. Thieves are going to go straight for the honeypot every time they want to break into a house and every time that the .gov you know 'accidentally', 'not totally on purpose', 'oops we screwed up', 'my bad', 'it will never happen again, promise' releases all of the names and addresses of gun owners then thieves have themselves a rich target audience. The liberal neighbor has to realize that he'd be deader than yesterdays fart if a group of thieves make off with 10 or 20 firearms and thousands of rounds of ammo. Why wouldn't thieves be emboldened to take out even more house, rob, rape, kill, it doesn't matter know one can do anything. I swear to God sometimes liberals are like the dumbest mother f*ckers on this planet.
Bottom line: stashing good and I support it. Sorry for the rant.