In the other thread, Baldwin, I link to the opinion article by Dershowitz. It is sloppy writing to his fan base. I know he knows the difference for I have heard him eloquently define it.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
17-year-old arrested in killing of 2 people in Kenosha
- Thread starter Toast
- Start date
In the other thread, Baldwin, I link to the opinion article by Dershowitz. It is sloppy writing to his fan base. I know he knows the difference for I have heard him eloquently define it.
He was identified and arrested. Fired pistol before Rittenhouse fired.
Kenosha protester charged with firing gun right before Kyle Rittenhouse began shooting
Kyle Rittenhouse's supporters say he fired his rifle in Kenosha after reacting to a nearby shot. That first shooter has now been charged.
www.jsonline.com
AHM
NES Member
You should ask the moderators over in the Tech Support subforum
to invent some kind of NES facility for sending messages to specific persons;
a Personal Message feature, if you will.
You're a little late to the party,
but accepted...
AHM
NES Member
If he's sinking to that level, he must really not give an F anymore.
He was identified and arrested. Fired pistol before Rittenhouse fired.
Kenosha protester charged with firing gun right before Kyle Rittenhouse began shooting
Kyle Rittenhouse's supporters say he fired his rifle in Kenosha after reacting to a nearby shot. That first shooter has now been charged.www.jsonline.com
Not who I’m talking about.
VetteGirlMA
NES Member
This trial is nothing like Derek Chauvin, who I firmly believe is probably a complete a**hole in real life but certainly wasn't a blood thirsty killer. These Soros prosecutors like to weave intricate tapestries to make a specific version of a story but it only take a little tug on the string to have it all unravel.
By the way did anyone catch the woman who was in the jury selection who commented about the rioters and the violence and then the judge quizzically asked her, so what did you do? She says "I went out and bought a gun".
When that happens, it should be an automatic acquittal. Unless it is potential evidence against a government agent, then it should be considered as evidence of wrongdoing unless there is other real exculpatory evidence. … in a better, less corrupt world.
clancy dogg
NES Member
I’m trying to count the raised fingers, but I can’t quite make it out.![[wave]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/011.gif "Wave [wave]")
(Ok, last off topic post for me lol)
AHM
NES Member
(As is now obvious),
I wasn't firing on all cylinders,
didn't realize that,
and lashed out.
It would inflame the situation for me to relate
the sly version we learned in the college computer center.
In any case, throwing caution to the winds, there is a pro-tip
that it took me all this time to realize might help.
Faced with the desire to get eboos to comment in public
about that article being discussed over in the Baldwin thread
(of course a perfectly reasonable goal),
a technical solution to get him to comment over there (if desired) is...
The <atsign>eboos will trigger an alert to him that
you've name-dropped him over in the Baldwin thread.
(He's written there twice already, but long before the Daily Wire post).
Anyhow, he'd be trolled to respond in-context.
If that was the right place.
about that article being discussed over in the Baldwin thread
(of course a perfectly reasonable goal),
a technical solution to get him to comment over there (if desired) is...
- In the Baldwin thread...
- ..."
Reply" to mkm's post that linked the Daily Wire article quoting Dershowitz... - ...(leaving inside the auto-quoted excerpt of that post at least the URL markup containing the link - and possibly nothing else)...
- ...and then below the quoted excerpt, write "Hey <atsign>eboos, what do you think is going on here with Dershowitz? Was he misquoted, or going senile, or am I missing something?"
The <atsign>eboos will trigger an alert to him that
you've name-dropped him over in the Baldwin thread.
(He's written there twice already, but long before the Daily Wire post).
Anyhow, he'd be trolled to respond in-context.
If that was the right place.
Hope this helps some time.
clancy dogg
NES Member
Lol thanks Dr Turing but I think I’ll keep doing it my way. I’m old.(As is now obvious),
I wasn't firing on all cylinders,
didn't realize that,
and lashed out.
It would inflame the situation for me to relate
the sly version we learned in the college computer center.
In any case, throwing caution to the winds, there is a pro-tip
that it took me all this time to realize might help.
Faced with the desire to get eboos to comment in public
about that article being discussed over in the Baldwin thread
(of course a perfectly reasonable goal),
a technical solution to get him to comment over there (if desired) is...
The <atsign> is supposed to be a real @.
- In the Baldwin thread...
- ..."
- ...(leaving inside the auto-quoted excerpt of that post at least the URL markup containing the link - and possibly nothing else)...
- ...and then below the quoted excerpt, write "Hey <atsign>eboos, what do you think is going on here with Dershowitz? Was he misquoted, or going senile, or am I missing something?"
The <atsign>eboos will trigger an alert to him that
you've name-dropped him over in the Baldwin thread.
(He's written there twice already, but long before the Daily Wire post).
Anyhow, he'd be trolled to respond in-context.
If that was the right place.
Hope this helps some time.
Because its viewer base is mostly tone deaf to things like this and doesn't care. Self Defense is a civil rights thing in a way. Most generic conservotards can't identify with something like that because they have this puritanical myth that they will never have to shoot somebody "cuz they don't get inna dat kinda trubble" without realizing that they could easily be Kyle Rittenhouse if circumstances were slightly different. If this had been a 90 yr old guy and his wife shooting 3 armed thugs trying to loot their store in kenosha my belief is Faux would have reluctantly covered more of it.
Gonna disagree on this one. I think the viewer base does care, but this topic is a Faux hot potato along the lines of Gingrich throwing shade on Soros.
Paid Open Society consultant has final say on content...
![[rofl]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/013.gif "ROFL [rofl]")
AHM
NES Member
If the defense thought there was the slightest chance of making hay,
they'll have raised an objection on the record.
Don't know/jus' sayin'.
I mostly hadn't even considered that.
Maybe they're working 24x7 to preposition on-the-street reporting resources
to cover the Antifa tantrum if the court does give Kyle a kiss.
![[kiss]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/022.gif "Kiss [kiss]")
To recap, the Fox News audience is the product,
delivered to the advertisers (the customers) in exchange for money.
And if the customer is always right...
I’ve got no dog in this fight. I’m just happy to see that my opinions matter.
I matter.![[dance]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/033.gif "Dance [dance]")
I matter.
WI governor is a nut liberal. He’s not getting a pardon from him
Well, not /enough/ care, because if they did they'd stop watching. Like they cared about Trump enough at least that faux shitting on trump before he became pres had to stop because the viewers reacting negatively to it...... I do, however, also agree with the hot potato thing. though. The deep staters that run MSM don't like people defending themselves. Faux also really never likes covering things like groups of armed black white and asian dudes working together to protect properties from BLM and antifa. They couldn't dare allow MSM to admit that most people are not racist. That was something i noticed a lot on seconday social media sources not covered very well in the news. Or for that matter, the frequent destruction of minority owned businesses by BLM/antifa fags.Gonna disagree on this one. I think the viewer base does care, but this topic is a Faux hot potato along the lines of Gingrich throwing shade on Soros.
Paid Open Society consultant has final say on content...
I agree, and I am willing to accept the system failing open even if it means a few shitbags might take advantage, so be it. The "house" still has way too many advantages over the average citizen, whether it's a criminal or someone defending themselves. People will be like "but dewd more criminuls will walk" waaaay more criminals walk in the US because of politically motivated shitbag prosecutors/DAs than legal civil rights protections in court.....
AHM
NES Member
IIRC, Murdoch's sons are now running the joint,
and they're profoundly unclear on the relationship between
not pissing off your viewers, ratings, and earning money.
AHM
NES Member
"Other misdemeanor"?
Andrew Branca sez in Rittenhouse Trial: What to Expect As Trial Starts Tomorrow:
Overview of the Events & Charges
that the max charges on each of the six counts are:
- 65 years,
- 17 years,
- Life+5 years,
- 65 years,
- 17 years, and
- 9 months.
BTW, a conviction on any charge except #6
("Unlawful Weapon Possession by Minor")
makes Kyle an FPP.
CatSnoutSoup
NES Member
Yeah BlackLivesMatter is going to be justifiably enraged because a white dude is acquitted of shooting three other white dudes.
Looked back a couple pages and didn't see this
Looked back a couple pages and didn't see this
There is even a High-Definition version that the FBI has 'lost'.
FalArAk
NES Member
Isn't the argument that Kyle brought a weapon to the protest rather than being an innocent passerby that was protecting himself ?
Personally I think there should have been groups of people protecting businesses and homes because the police certainly werent helping, but that is besides the point...
Personally I think there should have been groups of people protecting businesses and homes because the police certainly werent helping, but that is besides the point...
The point is to ensure that in the future there won't be "groups of people protecting businesses and homes" because those homeowners friends fear a ride on the rittenhouse railroad.
I believe part of the defense is that the local cops were going out of their way to thank people like Rittenhouse.
AHM
NES Member
I.e., the guys with the BLM lawn signs.Yeah BlackLivesMatter is going to be justifiably enraged because a white dude is acquitted of shooting three other white dudes.
There is even a High-Definition version that the FBI has 'lost'.
Can I get me an "FBI Drone Patroller" morale patch?
Juror in Kyle Rittenhouse trial dismissed for telling joke about police shooting of Jacob Blake
A juror was dismissed in Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial Thursday morning after he told a joke to a deputy earlier this week about the police shooting of Jacob Blake.
tuna
NES Member
Juror in Kyle Rittenhouse trial dismissed for telling joke about police shooting of Jacob Blake
A juror was dismissed in Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial Thursday morning after he told a joke to a deputy earlier this week about the police shooting of Jacob Blake.www.cnn.com
Idiot. Keep your effing mouth shut and don't say dumb shit until you get this kid released.
Similar threads
