Your .40 is enoughWait, what? Is new Sig M17 gay? Cause it's plastic or 'cause it's not 1911? I'm confused. It's not 6.5CM, so what is it? Although, I'm already gay so...need to know what I should be rocking to show it off.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Your .40 is enoughWait, what? Is new Sig M17 gay? Cause it's plastic or 'cause it's not 1911? I'm confused. It's not 6.5CM, so what is it? Although, I'm already gay so...need to know what I should be rocking to show it off.
Never going to happen. Once a machinegun, always a machinegun. Not to mention, the lower (with its third hole) is what makes a machine gun, not the the trigger components.[...] sell them in the US market as surplus after removing the full/burst-auto bits. Man, I hope they don't do the last one. This will destroy all domestic AR makers. I mean, why would you pay $2500 for LaRue when you can get an M4 for $500.
you nailed it. That peaked my interest also.This part is interesting:
'The decision to pursue an intermediate caliber round came out of the Small Arms Ammunition Configuration Study, which emerged from concerns about body armor improvements among Russian and potentially Chinese troops.'
Wait, what? Is new Sig M17 gay? Cause it's plastic or 'cause it's not 1911? I'm confused. It's not 6.5CM, so what is it? Although, I'm already gay so...need to know what I should be rocking to show it off.
The new rifle is 2lbs heavier than the M4, which is expected. Stinks, but is expected.
However, the new machine gun is 4lbs lighter than the SAW is fantastic. Lighter plus a more potent cartridge.
Army expects Next Generation Squad Weapon to get to its first unit by next year
An unloaded XM5 rifle is two pounds heavier than an unloaded M4. But the XM250 is four pounds lighter than the M249 SAW.www.defensenews.com
Man, imagine replacing all those M4s. They either have to destroy them, give them to non-NATO allies for free or sell them in the US market as surplus after removing the full/burst-auto bits. Man, I hope they don't do the last one. This will destroy all domestic AR makers. I mean, why would you pay $2500 for LaRue when you can get an M4 for $500.
Personally, I hope they sell it to non-NATO countries, destroying Russia's arms industry in the process. Who knows, we might see $100 Kalashnikovs yet
Meh, weak.Obviously there's branding attached, but let's be honest here - most cartridges have someone's name in it. ... I started counting in just the SAAMI rifle cartridge spec, then gave up. Look for yourself - they're almost all [...]Remington or Winchester...except for the Ruger, Nosler, or Savage entries.
(To wit: the special operations operating operatorsOf course none of this matters because there’s a good 95% chance of DOD either punting, crapping out on, or demotion of the cartridge to being a special ops thing.
Who cares about the rifle.
The optic, that sounds like it has a lot of stuff built into it.
Old and Busted: Optic.It does. Vortex had a long podcast style Q&A video with a lead engineer for it, but I can’t find it anymore.
I've long suspected that a key to modern pilot competenceI'd worry about information overload for individual soldiers. TMI for everyone means people have the potential to be even more confused, ...
Here's what the Army's Let's Piss Away Money On Fuel Cell Battery Rechargers Research CommandAs for batteries. Oh yes. I get it. Luckily the military is currently doing a lot of research on how to recharge things on the go so fewer spare batteries are needed for everything that’s carried.
Wait'll you see a demo of the new Replay™ mode.Lmao...
"Our guys cant shoot... we need a new gun!"
Here’s a link to the podcast:It does. Vortex had a long podcast style Q&A video with a lead engineer for it, but I can’t find it anymore.
It's funny how you NES skinflints think cost matters to Uncle Sam
.
Unloaded and I’m guessing naked.The rifle itself naked or with the LPVO?
They're not retiring the M4. It's going to be used for decades by REMFs, the ARNG, Reservists, etc.Wait! So if the army adopts new SIG and retires M4, will that make the "AR-15 is the same rifle military uses" anti-gunner argument mute? They don't even have "interchangeable" parts.
I also have a feeling that infantry TLs, SLs, PSGs, RTOs, COs, 1SGs and platoon medics will continue to rock M4s. Maybe not TLs, but SL and higher. Just a hunch, since M4s will likely stay in the infantry arms rooms like M16s did.They're not retiring the M4. It's going to be used for decades by REMFs, the ARNG, Reservists, etc.
Man, imagine replacing all those M4s. They either have to destroy them, give them to non-NATO allies for free or sell them in the US market as surplus after removing the full/burst-auto bits. Man, I hope they don't do the last one. This will destroy all domestic AR makers. I mean, why would you pay $2500 for LaRue when you can get an M4 for $500.
Personally, I hope they sell it to non-NATO countries, destroying Russia's arms industry in the process. Who knows, we might see $100 Kalashnikovs yet
Always smart. Have multiple calibers that sort of look like each other all over a battlefield. LOL
Always smart. Have multiple calibers that sort of look like each other all over a battlefield. LOL
I’ll wait for the 1911 variant…
Same size, just has the compensator it into the slide. Not sure if it has “fancier” parts or not, but the side says “sig custom works” whatever that meansDamn, that's nice... Same size as the 365 carry model, just upgraded ?
I think I want one
Wait, this is not the true velocity polymer case stuff??Can't comment on the rest, but you're not the first to say this and I want to catch us all up - this cartridge might have a composite case, but not a polymer one. It has a stainless case head attached to a brass body by some third (proprietary) piece. The few things I've seen claim it's not reloadable, but they're not clear why.
Nope. That may have been one of the other two entrants?Wait, this is not the true velocity polymer case stuff??
No, each of the three performers also bid their own cartridge design. Sig went with a bi-metal option.Wait, this is not the true velocity polymer case stuff??
Sweeeet!Good question.
Looks an awful lot like this-
.277 SIG Fury Demystified
Speculation on the .277 SIG Fury has practically broken the internet. GunsAmerica spoke directly with SIG to get the scoop on this revolutionary cartridge.www.gunsamerica.com
3000fps out of a 16” barrel of a gun weighing only 6+ lbs is pretty awesome.No, each of the three performers also bid their own cartridge design. Sig went with a bi-metal option.