Boghog1
NES Member
I don't know that I would trust @Broccoli Iglesias judgment on that, he said in the funny picture thread that a woman with pointy elbows was not guilty.Was she hot?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I don't know that I would trust @Broccoli Iglesias judgment on that, he said in the funny picture thread that a woman with pointy elbows was not guilty.Was she hot?
She will be governor long before that’s won or lost.No, she is busy running for Governor, she doesn't need the press of losing a lawsuit.
Sorry, I was drinking when I typed that.I don't know that I would trust @Broccoli Iglesias judgment on that, he said in the funny picture thread that a woman with pointy elbows was not guilty.
Sorry, I was drinking when I typed that.
I left the stud club when Reptile declared himeself president.Not an excuse.
You're still on Stud Club double-secret probation.
I left thet stud club when Reptile declared himeself president.
I am now member of the double secret NES stud club. It has higher standard for women.
Why we need more than 20 members in a private chat.
There are always morons.JFC, what Massachusetts gun dealer in their right mind would talk to the press. Throw their ass out when they walk in.
"No Media" and "No Pictures"
You all know this. Legislation is coming when Maura wins. Things will get interesting. I'm sure this annoyed her.
I'm disgusted at how many here are so quick to jump on the bandwagon against Guida without having the full story and outright ignoring that the quotes are not just out of context, but the individual sentences have been edited to include only part of the sentence. This screams manipulation.Makes me wonder how good of a lawyer he really is if he doesn't know how to speak to a reporter.
Also, if they quoted him out of context, I would love to see him post a transcript of the question and answer. Unedited.
That is why I mentioned earlier, change my mind and I will delete my posts.I'm disgusted at how many here are so quick to jump on the bandwagon against Guida without having the full story and outright ignoring that the quotes are not just out of context, but the individual sentences have been edited to include only part of the sentence. This screams manipulation.
And I'll add this, since no one seems interested in the details, the article NEVER says Jason Guida said anything to the reporter. Let that sink in.
There are other statements attributed to @one-eyed Jack and others that were apparently lifted from NES, do you think there are no other sources of material for words by Jason Guida that could be edited to imply something the reporter wanted to imply? Get real. With all that he has said that is public record and easily available, I'll bet you could pluck out a partial sentence that would sound like support to almost anything. Even if he did give the reporter a statement, the level of editing by the reporter still screams manipulation and disinformation. Maybe everyone should condemn Jack and Jim as well, they are both mentioned and quoted in the article... see how ridiculous that sounds.
The best lawyers 1. know the law inside and out. 2. are masterful and clever wordsmiths and 3. think fast and talk faster. Counselor Tassel is all of the above and more. Journalism is almost dead. Today’s ”journalists” are smooth brain activists masquerading as journalists.
It sounds like he is trying to stir the pot and create some new clients.Jason Guida moved mountains for me !! I have a hard time believing he said anything with malice or disbaraging about our 2A rights. I havnt read the article yet but from the little bit I read in this post , it sounds like he stated the obvious about the ability to buy a black sporting rifle.
i firmly believe the ag's office never gives us a second thought. she happily runs around trying to find liberal class action suits to join, and keep up with queer rights and other mundane shit. the gun owner and her office co-exist...out of sight, out of mind...until someone pokes the hornets nest and those phones in her office ring off the wall. then she needs to react with some stupid edict that is good enough to get the liberal citizens off her back.
You all know this. Legislation is coming when Maura wins. Things will get interesting. I'm sure this annoyed her.
you don't think people don't pound that ag's office with calls after an article like this comes out? was it coincidence that we got the 2016 second awb after the tv interview hit the air?There are no "citizens calling the AGs office whining about guns"
right. but a few menacing letters mean nothing in the big picture. it's only when this shit happens that we see a massive change. everything is good and cozy until the well meaning gun lover tries to explain the loopholes to a "gun civillian."its basically a tradition.
how do you think jack comes off in that article? i know him from here as harmless with an un-natural fixation on a bird. but now anyone who reads that sees a semi senile old man who hates liberals and manages the worlds largest gun emporium while selling machine guns.
it's not the crime...it's the public opinion that f***s us up. we walk a precarious fine line here in massachusetts. again don't ask don't tell. but we love to tell. there is something with humans that they love the attention of being interviewed by media. it almost validates them as an expert.Sorry, just for clarification which one of those is the crime?
I trust the media less than politicians, which is not at all. Especially, when they obviously have an axe to grind.I'm disgusted at how many here are so quick to jump on the bandwagon against Guida without having the full story and outright ignoring that the quotes are not just out of context, but the individual sentences have been edited to include only part of the sentence. This screams manipulation.
And I'll add this, since no one seems interested in the details, the article NEVER says Jason Guida said anything to the reporter. Let that sink in.
There are other statements attributed to @one-eyed Jack and others that were apparently lifted from NES, do you think there are no other sources of material for words by Jason Guida that could be edited to imply something the reporter wanted to imply? Get real. With all that he has said that is public record and easily available, I'll bet you could pluck out a partial sentence that would sound like support to almost anything. Even if he did give the reporter a statement, the level of editing by the reporter still screams manipulation and disinformation. Maybe everyone should condemn Jack and Jim as well, they are both mentioned and quoted in the article... see how ridiculous that sounds.
New anti-gun/anti-gunowner legislation has been promised to us anyway...Legislation is coming when Maura wins.