- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 47,555
- Likes
- 33,622
How does this risk compare to convenience store clerks or farmers?there's a great risk for harm in performing the job. So I don't agree with you just offhandedly dismissing the dangers of the job.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
How does this risk compare to convenience store clerks or farmers?there's a great risk for harm in performing the job. So I don't agree with you just offhandedly dismissing the dangers of the job.
How does this risk compare to convenience store clerks or farmers?
That's what I was thinkingI’m wondering if the overcharge is a game to get her a not guilty. If the jury can only consider a murder charge and they can’t make out that she even knew him - that’s a hard road to travel.
Yeah, for now.The murder charge is to avoid riots.
Excellent point.Yeah, for now.
That was my first thought. I ran it past a good friend who is a retired Texas cop, and he agreed that proving murder would be difficult -- but that it would be a good plea bargain pressure to accept the lesser included charge of manslaughter.I’m wondering if the overcharge is a game to get her a not guilty. If the jury can only consider a murder charge and they can’t make out that she even knew him - that’s a hard road to travel.
The prosecutor gave her a gift.That was my first thought. I ran it past a good friend who is a retired Texas cop, and he agreed that proving murder would be difficult -- but that it would be a good plea bargain pressure to accept the lesser included charge of manslaughter.
He predicted that she would accept manslaughter, with something like 20 years, 15 suspended, and 5 years in prison.
True, but sometimes juries are given the option of a lesser included charge. This is particularly useful to the prosecution in those cases where a jury cannot be sure of guilt, as this allows a compromise verdict.She’ll never be found guilty of murder.
True, but sometimes juries are given the option of a lesser included charge. This is particularly useful to the prosecution in those cases where a jury cannot be sure of guilt, as this allows a compromise verdict.
Her murder trial is set for August. Not a whole lot of info about this case because there’s been a gag order. There is still some interesting information however.
Police almost immediately searched the victims apartment. The killers apartment however was never searched. She quickly moved out.
She was charged a couple days after the shooting, and released on bond in just hours.
After her arrest she allegedly took a Caribbean cruise, possibly in violation of her bond.
Her story changed from her key fob didn’t work when she tried to get in to the door being already ajar.
It sounds like they are going with the “She was really tired after working a long day and made a mistake” defense.
If it works, it raises an interesting point. If working overtime can cause officers to be so tired that it causes them to and excuses killing innocent people, why should cops even be allowed to work overtime?
Wasn't there some possible collusion on the part of the DA too maybe overcharging her to get it thrown out? Like they went for a premeditated murder or something knowing they couldn't meet that standard?
DAs love to over-charge people they don't really want to convict, all while making a show of the charges and trial.She’ll be acquitted. At least of murder. Maybe a hung jury on manslaughter. I’m not hopeful. It’s very clearly (at least) manslaughter.
Remember how the defense tried to block her cell phone records?
Turns out she was doing the nasty with her partner, and was on the phone with him right up until the shooting.
Prosecutors reveal Amber Guyger was on phone with partner before shooting neighbor
Remember how the defense tried to block her cell phone records?
Turns out she was doing the nasty with her partner, and was on the phone with him right up until the shooting.
Prosecutors reveal Amber Guyger was on phone with partner before shooting neighbor
I agree with your first point. But IMHO that doesn't warrant condemning the many innocent/good because of the bad. That's what lumping them together and imposing guilt by association does. Just because someone is a cop doesn't make them a bad person. But you talk of them as such.
On point 2 - they have a lot more to worry about aside from getting shot. They could get poked by a dirty needle searching someone, take a shot to the face from someone resisting arrest, get in an accident while involved in a chase... there's a great risk for harm in performing the job. So I don't agree with you just offhandedly dismissing the dangers of the job.
And.... as evidenced by you, they perform a largely thankless job.
You know what's funny though.... This kind of thing is exactly how the libs look at gun owners. They assign guilt by association as well. Because of the acts of a few, they distrust and assign guilt to all..... in their case it's against gun owners....
Open your mind brother... don't make the same mistake...
A few cops aren't fit to serve, but that comment says more about you than them. Show some appreciation for the majority who protect you while you sleep.
I've had far more positive than negative personal interaction with LEOs. Guess you haven't. Maybe human motivation is complicated, nuanced, and individual. Maybe respect goes both ways. Maybe you think online arguments are a good use of free time. Maybe you're reading this out loud.The supreme court has repeatedly ruled that the police have no obligation to protect the public and has held that stance for over forty years now. Where have you been, sir? See Warren V DC.
Again, some comments say more about you than anyone else. Thanks for elevating the conversation.How do those blue balls taste? Do you prefer them with dingle berries or without?
I've had far more positive than negative personal interaction with LEOs. Guess you haven't. Maybe human motivation is complicated, nuanced, and individual. Maybe respect goes both ways. Maybe you think online arguments are a good use of free time. Maybe you're reading this out loud.
Again, some comments say more about you than anyone else. Thanks for elevating the conversation.
"This kind of thing is exactly how the libs look at gun owners."
Do you remember the time the legal gun owners banded together and fabricated a bunch of lies and cover ups to try to exonerate the mass shooter? Yeah, me neither.
No problem. I'm always happy to elevate the conversation. Online arguments can be a good opportunity to educate the sheeple who think the cops are there to protect them.