Story in Boston.com today:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/04/12/officials_others_hail_new_gun_bill/
I'm all for letting judges take into consideration whether or not someone legally owned a firearm when considering bail, but Suffolk DA Daniel F. Conley is not our friend: "People who carry guns are inherently dangerous, and the bail statute should reflect that."
Seems to me he thinks *all of us* are dangerous!![[angry]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/008.gif "Angry [angry]")
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/04/12/officials_others_hail_new_gun_bill/
I'm all for letting judges take into consideration whether or not someone legally owned a firearm when considering bail, but Suffolk DA Daniel F. Conley is not our friend: "People who carry guns are inherently dangerous, and the bail statute should reflect that."
Seems to me he thinks *all of us* are dangerous!
