pastera
NES Member
Try reading - I specifically called out interstate purchase which was restricted because a prohibited person could cross state lines where records weren't easily found. BS reason but that's the history.How do background checks and "data sharing" (whatever you mean by that) remove the reason for "the lists"? I am not for them, but I don't see the overlap here.
SCOTUS may simply fix the problem across all of the restrion states by removing an antiquated, unnecessary restriction.
A little light reading.What is "Bolland"? Have not heard of that one yet.
Both of us have said that it will happen but will take time.Was it you or Picton who keeps saying how long things will take? I have a feeling they could be playing ping pong for years with this.
Like this:
If the 1st plays ping pong then SCOTUS will scoop up the case. I will need to look up the separate concurrence in one of the NY cases where I believe Alito revealed that if prompt, clear action on a GVR did not happen they would take the case back.