-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Healey "closing the loophole" letter to gun dealers
- Thread starter CAR
- Start date
- Status
Wow, tackling the important issues. The guy on the radio is pissed because the tunnel walls are dirty in Boston.
Silly me. I thought the "F" in FID stood for "firearms". Now I realize it's "felon".
Boris
Son of Kalashnikov
even in death camps some choose to serve their executioners, I can see no different how some are rolling over AG's bullshit.
there will be no more calls about firearms.
every radio show has a " cough button " which is a 5 - 15 second delay that they use to cut out any calls they don''t want to get on air.
Yeah, none of that shit will matter. It's going to be sporadic go time if prosecutions occur.
Bathrooms are his favorite. When she swings at him he hides there and cries a lot.
A petition is going to do nothing but add your name to another list of targets. Baker doesn't give a shit about the overreach and worse he agrees with it. This is here to stay. The only question is how it will be enforced and when.
not new guy
NES Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2009
- Messages
- 39,773
- Likes
- 64,856
I knew somebody would throw absurd back in my face.
What I meant is that it would be absurd for them to try to press criminal charges when the guidance - which is the law for all intents and purposes at this point - clearly states that it doesn't apply to rifles obtained pre-yesterday. As mentioned before, I think that was an intentional move to avoid ex post facto issues. She could change her guidance in the future, but the way things stand today it would be absurd for a prosecutor to try to use this guidance to prosecute someone with a rifle obtained prior to the 20th.
![[smile]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/001.gif "Smile [smile]")
And I do think she misspoke - or at least overstepped yesterday when she said that the guns sold post-94 were sold illegally. I didn't hear her say it, but when did that come up? It's not quite in line with her written directive, unless I'm missing something.
Come on in......the water's fine.....................................................................................for now.
lol someone just called about defense bills for indigent people's representation claiming it's a constitutional right and was so angry...meanwhile, our 2A rights are getting butt rammed and that's no big deal.
NH here I come.
NH here I come.
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2009
- Messages
- 5,222
- Likes
- 3,608
realistically they are only going to look at it and determine if it is for or against. I figure the 1st line is about all they'll see.
Draper v Healey
He should see tunnels in the uranium mines. They were polished by felons like us daily.
Actually, the AG is under the exec branch as its chief legal counsel. http://www.mass.gov/bb/gaa/fy2010/app_10/ga_10/hcdefault.htm
Boris
Son of Kalashnikov
it shows that peons are restless, takes a sec of time, not a panacea but a snail step in the right direction.
Question and answer period: Someone asked if she thought the gun shops had consulted attorneys and attempted to comply with the AWB, should they have been selling them the whole time.
The Q&A period after the press conference had good stuff that I wish we had a recording of.
Boris
Son of Kalashnikov
me too, does anyone know which station was this presented to?
not new guy
NES Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2009
- Messages
- 39,773
- Likes
- 64,856
That's what I figured: She was speaking off the cuff.
Makes you wonder if the recording is being suppressed because of the content.
THIS - we need more talk of this. You need to hammer on not the gun point but the following.
* circumventing the legislative process is alarming. Removing one right today can be freedom of religion tomorrow.
* it removes the power from out legislators and the Governor
* If he goes into legality of it, no where in MGL is there any mention of a "Similarity test". The definition and features of an assault weapon are clear cut and to change it can only be done by our legislature.
* If it goes south and they cut people off - this is discrimination against black people because of the BLM and the recent shooting.
NH produced here. Do not forget.
Wife and I have already spoken about NH or SC, I think this is the proverbial straw on the camel's back. Now to figure out commutes and employment (my company has 65,000 people and offices everywhere).
Interesting. I stand corrected. Yet she dictates policy to the Judicial? Who does she report to? The voters?
![[rofl]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/013.gif "ROFL [rofl]")
strangenh
NES Member
My neighbor's palatial house in S. Central NH is up for sale. Gun-friendly and dog-friendly neighbors. 4ac abutting conservation land. Come on over, guys. Keep NH free. **** like your AG just pulled is why a lot of us here either moved back or to NH from states where we felt continuously in retreat.
I wish I could move to SC, but my children are in North central MA. I may look at finishing renovating my home and putting it up for sale.
She's executive. She enforces the law. Judicial determines if it was enforced correctly. Per the state Constitution, yes she reports to the voters. She's a more or less independent part of the executive - which is pure bullshit. So if you're arrested and she decides to prosecute the judiciary decides if the arrest and interpretation of the law was valid. Good luck with that.Interesting. I stand corrected. Yet she dictates policy to the Judicial? Who does she report to? The voters?
- Status
Similar threads
