... the average person would be slashing wildly in a knife fight trying to stay alive, not concentrating on complex defensive and offensive stances and motions...
While this is true, this is an effect of the same adrenaline that I mentioned earlier will render any normal person's folding knife no better than a rock in a life-or-death fight. Trained operators right now have found that deploying folders is extremely difficult in combat. Why any civilians thinks they can where SF guys can't, I don't know. Back to the quoted statement, while people can take amazing amounts of slashing damage and still live, stabbing on the other hand can be fatal even for shallow and seemingly inconsequential hits.
...Gun>everything. Knife vs knife, both people are walking away pretty effed up, and that's if they walk away at all. 100%, if you have a knife, and he has a knife, you're getting stabbed, and all the fancy training in the world isn't going to stop that.
No, gun !> everything. Consider:
- with a gun you have X chances to poke a small hole in somebody. If you fail, which is not uncommon, the gun is a rock.
- guns are not the effective in close quarters, especially in grappling situations. knives are _very_ effective in CQB.
- guns are prone to malfunctions and user errors, especially under stress.
- where guns have X chances, knives have practically unlimited chances.
- guns are slower to deploy than knives. (most of the time, i'll say)
- where guns have a maximum entry hole size of about .45, the smallest knives have a hole poking diameter of about .5, and go steadily up from there. Further, once a bullet stops, damage is done - but knives can be and frequently are continually moved around in the wound channel, doing further damage and making the wound more likely to bleed the victim out (and considerably harder to repair).
- Again, consider the existence of the 21 foot rule, and what it represents. First, it means that drawing a blade is faster than a gun within that radius. Additionally, that the threat is considered immediately lethal. Why? Average people can kill with a blade faster than an officer can draw and subdue. Also, the LEOs hate blades because their vests, effective against bullets, aren't that reliable against blades.
- guns require training. knives don't. anyone can poke a lethal hole in someone...the same cannot be said for guns.
- Google gun vs. knife lethality. You might be surprised what you find.
Anyhow, I'll leave it at that. But, parting question - if an armored officer is trained to consider anyone within 21 feet of them a lethal threat with a blade, and studies show and an average person can draw and engage (and kill) a trained LEO in that distance before they can draw their gun, where does that leave the average person?