People seem to believe, after being told lies by the media, the schools, their beaten down friends and of course the government, that somehow, some way the government got a new power that was prohibited to them by the constitution to regulate the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
But that just ain't so. The Bill of Rights is not subject to legislation, popular vote or any Mass. backward politician --
"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
The right to keep and bear arms is in no manner dependent upon the license to carry:
Professional entitlements are undoubtedly subject to licensing as the "requirement of a licensee to engage in the business specified in the statute [are] appropriate to protect the people in the enjoyment of their relative rights and privileges, and to guard them against fraud and imposition, and is not forbidden by the Fourteenth Amendment;" W. W. Cargill Co. v. Minnesota, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) but, "the Second Amendment, like the First and Fourth Amendments, codified a pre-existing right. ... As we said in United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 553 (1876), "[t]his is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence." District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) The Constitution merely instructs that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
I BEAR ARMS and Carry Nothing!