MA Gun Grab 2024: H.4885 - Passed legislature, headed to the governor

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I'm a little slow on the pickup on this one. But with all the talk about Glock switches on that bill today, I just realized why they hate Glocks. I suspect all along there have been some who didn't care about a loaded chamber indicator, safety selector, etcetera, but were actually afraid of them because of the idea that people are making them full auto just by swapping out some parts. It's like the ATF and open bolt semi-autos.

Maybe I'm wrong, but that was the impression I got.

The anti-glock stance by the AG’s office has been going on for a lot longer than glock switches have been around, let alone common.

I’m pretty sure it stemmed from the AG’s office demanding Glock hand over certain information (don’t recall what) and Glock telling them to pound sand because they were under no legal obligation to hand the information over.
 
every one of them need to be replaced all the way down to town government, the only answer. one can dream
Soros has said that he learned early on that his money went much farther in influencing government when he started looking down the chain to local races for DA‘s, judges, and state and other county-level elections. He’ll throw money at national races, but, he gets much more bang for his buck by owning DA’s, AG’s, and judges.
 
So are newer gun owners getting lubed since grandfathering post 2016 will be a thing? This is a total miscarriage of justice and a disgrace to the Founding Fathers memory.
2016 isn't anything. It isn't a law. Her decree was nothing. If they try and do that, they'll get slapped in the dick faster than you can imagine.
 
the second one is by the bills author. It makes the July 20th 2016 date the grandfathered date.
And of course 2016 is a fake grandfathering date and they know if. It’s punishment for everyone buying from the Mill. It risks the same outcome as no grandfathering which is a court throwing out the entire AWB on 4th, 5th and/or 14th amendment grounds. All the court can do is nuke mgl 140 131M.

Stupid of them if they don’t use either the language of when the law is effective or 8/1/24.

And of course the only if “registered” language is its own dumpster fire. What happens when the court figures out you can’t register not to mention the ambiguity (acknowledged in this bill) over assembling or manufacturing your own.

And while we are at it, all AR lowers are now assault weapons under this bill and you can’t even fake register them since they are not weapons under current MGL.


So much infringement, so much ignorance.
 
No shit. If I knew you had and endless supply of money to give me I would’ve hit you up a while ago.
I told many of you when the House Bill was released.

You all have credit cards.

I get great balance transfer offers.

I just got 4% for $5,000 until 2/2025.

Use your credit to buy stuff.
 
The suspense is killing me...

I got some brie from Trader Joes yesterday.

Time to cut off a couple slices to calm me down!!!
 
the second one is by the bills author. It makes the July 20th 2016 date the grandfathered date.
It does not

This is insidious. It only protects these from the copies and duplicates test. Still assault weapons under the “semi automatic version of an automatic firearm” test and the “if originally manufactured as an assault weapon test.

Note that it says shall not be considered a copy or duplicate- not that these shall not be considered assault weapons
 
It does not

This is insidious. It only protects these from the copies and duplicates test. Still assault weapons under the “semi automatic version of an automatic firearm” test and the “if originally manufactured as an assault weapon test.

Note that it says shall not be considered a copy or duplicate- not that these shall not be considered assault weapons
but if they arent considered a copy or a duplicate, then they only have to pass the 2 features test of the existing AWB. A test that all rifles sold post 94 in the state should pass. Remember a copy or duplicate renders the features portion of the law irrelevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom