Maryland AWB case Snope v Brown waiting on Cert grant from SCOTUS. (Formerly Bianchi v Brown & Bianchi v Frosh)

[MickeyD’s]

A woman being fickle

Shocking

 

[The Usual Suspect]

People lie on job applications all the time.
How many times have we been sucked in by the "I'm very pro 2A " lie ?

Or the many other lies by politicians.

 

[alan226]

Once they get in, they are in for life and answer to no one. At least with a lower court, there can be appeals and judicial review.
SCOTUS answers to no one with no other oversight,,,

 

[Parker Schreiber]

Once they get in, they are in for life and answer to no one. At least with a lower court, there can be appeals and judicial review.
SCOTUS answers to no one with no other oversight,,,

SCOTUS Justices can be impeached.

 

[alan226]

SCOTUS Justices can be impeached.

Sure, but it has been 220 years since the one and only time a SC justice was impeached and they were acquitted.
Still no judicial review by a different court, They are the last line.

 

[sbhaven]

Reminder, the Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m. Links to the various cases being watched below:
Snope: Docket for 24-203
Ocean State Tactical: Docket for 24-131
Antonyuk: Docket for 24-795

 

[HorizontalHunter]

Reminder, the Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m. Links to the various cases being watched below:
Snope: Docket for 24-203
Ocean State Tactical: Docket for 24-131
Antonyuk: Docket for 24-795

 

[LLF]

People lie on job applications all the time.
How many times have we been sucked in by the "I'm very pro 2A " lie ?

Yes, noses start growing every time you hear "I'm a gun owner myself but..."

 

[VTski4x4]

I'm sure the can will be kicked this morning.

 

[JoseyWales]

Aren't other non-2A SCOTUS rulings (I can't name examples), related to business, finance, monopolies. cake making, or whatever, ruled on pretty quickly? What is it with 2A cases that they are long and drawn out.

 

[lutstribe]

No certiorari today

 

[VTski4x4]

as suspected - no snopes or ocean. f***ing F-GOTS

 

[Noreaster]

I am running out of rational reasons why they have not acted yet. Either for or against cert.

 

[AMV]

I am running out of rational reasons why they have not acted yet. Either for or against cert.

By not denying, they have acted for it…: you just don’t see it yet

 

[aphextwin11]

Dobbs was rescheduled or relisted over 30 times. It HAS to be because it will be a "landmark" case/ruling. There's no other reason. I have a difficult time imagining they would relist snope et al. over 10 times if they were going to deny

 

[lutstribe]

6 weeks or so before end of term

 

[HorizontalHunter]

as suspected - no snopes or ocean. f***ing F-GOTS

Actually, I'm not surprised anymore. As expected just kick the can down the road.

 

[Jsfitzgerald85]

Thing we will see before SCOTUS takes an AWB case.

1. World Peace
2. The colonization of Mars
3. near light speed travel
4. The conquest of the milky way
5. The end of the universe

 

[HorizontalHunter]

Thing we will see before SCOTUS takes an AWB case.

1. World Peace
2. The colonization of Mars
3. near light speed travel
4. The conquest of the milky way
5. The end of the universe

6. Hell freezing over.

 

[VTski4x4]

7. Pigs flying

 

[sbhaven]

Certiorari was denied for Antonyuk v James in today's order's list.
Next conference day appears to be next week Thursday, April 17. With a release of the order list at 9:30 a.m. the following Monday, April 21.

 

[Joeldiaz]

Certiorari was denied for Antonyuk v James in today's order's list.
Next conference day appears to be next week Thursday, April 17. With a release of the order list at 9:30 a.m. the following Monday, April 21.

Just more evidence for the obvious, interlocutory appeals to SCOTUS are useless. Focus on losing on the merits in the inferior courts as quickly as possible so you can get to SCOTUS on a final judgement.

 

[Dennis in MA]

So last year, they vacate AvJ. Courts continue to F it up. They re-appeal to the SC and it's denied???? Mmmmmmm. I'm still thinking a stronger ruling is coming. At least I'm hoping. Hey - it worked for hte 04 Sox.

 

[Cap'n Mike]

11 Relists

My uneducated guess is they are waiting on Duncan V Bonta.

Both Duncan and Snope were GVRd with Bruen and both were again screwed up by their respective circuits.

 

[El_Guapo77]

7. Pigs flying

View: https://youtu.be/2omx0uvl0WU?si=BbI37x1aLNiavQDg

 

[LittleCalm]

 

[Noreaster]

11 Relists

My uneducated guess is they are waiting on Duncan V Bonta.

Both Duncan and Snope were GVRd with Bruen and both were again screwed up by their respective circuits.

I would think that the ocean state case would solve duncan as well. (but then again, that friggen court may just ignore it)

 

[Cap'n Mike]

I would think that the ocean state case would solve duncan as well. (but then again, that friggen court may just ignore it)

It would, but my thinking is its not just about the law, its also about slapping down the 9th and 5th circuits for getting the GVRs so wrong.

Purely uneducated speculation on my part.

 

[ddeck]

7. Pigs flying

8. Reptile selling one of those Noveske lowers @ $3000

 

[pastera]

I would think that the ocean state case would solve duncan as well. (but then again, that friggen court may just ignore it)

Duncan is ready for review
OST is not.

However since in many assault weapon definition magazine capacity is a factor, SCOTUS only needs Snope to speak directly to magazine capacity.
And they can add clear dicta that accoutrements, ammo and accessories are no different than parts of an arm.