vellnueve said:
Well, it wouldn't help the people who deliberately shoot them.
peterpressure said:
I was at MRA this weekend shooting next to a MRA instructor. A few lanes down, 2 gentlemen were shooting some large caliber revolvers and I heard them knock down 2 Carriers. MRA instructor did not say a word, I kept looking at him to see if he would do or say anything tot hem, nothing. Next this gentleman and his GF are shooting. Well, his GF shot the ceiling. I packed up my items and left.
Wow. From reading today's posts in this thread, do I understand properly that some people in the Loeb range are deliberately shooting the carriers? And more damage comes from people who can't even shoot straight at moderate distances?
Massman,
For about a month or so, I've been considering joining Mass Rifle. It's not far from me, and the 24/7 range access is a big plus, as I sometimes only get free time at odd hours.
As part of my research, I downloaded the range rules from the website and read them through.
I also read about the initiation procedure for prospective members. From doing this, I got the impression that MRA is rather serious about its new members' character, abilities and qualifications. The "New Member Application Procedure" on the second page of the application form says that you have to:
1) Appear in person, have a picture taken, put down some money and schedule an orientation session.
2) Watch a movie and take a test. Then, take a shooting test.
3) Then, have an interview with the Membership Committee.
4) Then, meet the Board of Directors.
It sounds as though you people check out the new applicants pretty thoroughly. Application submitted in person, written exam, range test, interview and meeting with the Board? Yikes! I'm a clean-cut, well-spoken, quiet, responsible person, as well as a capable shooter, and even I, when I read that, thought, "Geez, I'd better have my ducks in a row when I go see these gentlemen. They look like they mean business. If they see one thing they don't like, they'll throw me out on my ear."
And, actually, I really was looking forward to joining (have to muster a little cash first, ammo's got me over a barrel) because I was fairly certain that, if my application were accepted, I'd be in the company of really great people. And I'm sure that most members are great people. So what I guess I mean is that I would have expected the membership to be almost entirely a**h***-free, and incompetent-free.
But the kind of activity I'm hearing about in this thread sounds like the work of either malicious punks or dangerous incompetents. And these people are members, or the guests of members? How the heck do people like this get into the club? Doesn't the extensive (or so it sounds from reading about it) application process weed these people out?
I know you can't
always tell an a**h***, or an incompetent, when you see him. But you
almost always can. And the more time you spend with an applicant, the better the chances for getting a feel for the kind of person you are inviting to join your club. If you guys meet with a person no fewer than FOUR times before granting range access, I should think that you have opportunity for a pretty darn thorough evaluation of the applicant's character and abilities, common sense, etc.
If, during the application process, you have in front of you the kind of person who would either intentionally, maliciously damage club property or a person who is so clumsy and careless that s/he can't hit the side of a barn, then I have to believe that those qualities would manifest themselves in various, small ways during the course of the interviews and tests.
I'm talking about things like low scores on the exam indicating poor attention to detail, obvious lack of common sense in handling guns (even if for the first time), failure to listen to or follow instructions, inappropriate comments or backtalk of any kind, a bad or combative or even frivolous attitude towards authority figures, wandering attention during instruction, etc. These kind of little red flags show up all the time with such people. Is it the case that you get applicants at MRA who look like model shooters throughout their orientation and interview and then start wrecking the place once they get their fobs?
Sorry for the rant, Massman, and I'm not speaking badly of Mass Rifle here. After all, I know hardly anything about it, and I'm not acquainted with any members there. I'm simply curious about what seems a really strange and startling situation.