The question is highly subjective and can not be definitely answered.
There are pretty objective industry standards to assess and compare handgun reliability.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
The question is highly subjective and can not be definitely answered.
The HK45 has a pretty good reputation for reliability.
![]()
HK45 Endurance Test: Week Thirty Seven
50,000 rounds 1 stoppages 1 (*) malfunctions 1 parts breakages 50,000 rounds in just over eight months. And yes, as many of you have guessed, that is Larry “LAV” Vickers himself shootin…pistol-training.com
Just gathering data here from other shooters. I have my opinions from observation, not some holier than thou industry knowledge.This. Unless you are putting north of 10K rounds through guns, and somewhat abusing them, you cannot talk about "most reliable".
My SW929 has north of 15K rounds, and a far greater amount of dry fires. Besides a screw coming lose once in a while, it has been reliable AF. Also, all rounds are .458, so oversized for a 9mm.
Also, to the OP point, how many you see come through for repair does not always = less or more reliable. You have to know the percentage of guns being sent back.
I appreciate you trying to flex with personal experience, and I am sure there is some correlation, but we need better data.
People love to shit on 'turk-shit'. But The Turks have been making guns longer than anyone else in Europe. They are a people with a rich long brutal history of violence and weapon making innovation from such violence. For a little over two bens you can get a CM9, a DA/SA with safety and a trigger better than an HK. Word on the street is it's reliable too.Ive had no problems with my Turkish 9mm either...they've been 100% for me..the Canik TP9SF and Tisas PX-9. Run like a top. I had many thousands thru my TP9SF before I sold it to buy the PX-9 for the range. Only reason I changed is cause the PX9 gen 3 had all the optics cut, and full 20 round mags and suppressor barrel for dirt cheap money. Ive got 1K thru it and its never burped.
Canik was a MA gun with crip mags so no reason to keep that thing....
People love to shit on 'turk-shit'. But The Turks have been making guns longer than anyone else in Europe. They are a people with a rich long brutal history of violence and weapon making innovation from such violence. For a little over two bens you can get a CM9, a DA/SA with safety and a trigger better than an HK. Word on the street is it's reliable too.
View attachment 964822
Disagreed. I've had guns that run garbage ammo all day long. Tolerances matter.I do not believe there is a single answer to the stated question. Most reliable with what ammo? What state of maintenance? There is not a single handgun that eats well everything. I have seen horrible Glocks and perfect 22lr pistols and everything in between.
Pick a gun that has good track record, keep it stock and clean it regularly, experiment with ammo to see what it likes and practice, practice, practice…
Absolutely true.....while they always made weapons.....Italian guns were always better.....for a long time. Not so much anymore.....The 4 oldest gun manufacturers are in Germany and Italy.
How long Turkey as a country has been producing guns has nothing to do with quality.
===> It's not just Foh-tays. We used Glock 19's for work in AZ. Each shift, we would unload the rounds in a magazine (and the chamber) and return them to their box. The next shift came out with their own ammo. The shift after that would end up using the ammo from the first shift. And so forth. When I became an armorer, one of the things that I constantly tried to do was pull the rounds that were set-back. And there were quite a few.if you are not familiar with the Glock KABOOM, and it has been a while since it was a topic of discussion, the failure was because people would chamber a round when they were going to carry the weapon, then when they were done using the gun they would drop the magazine, eject the round in the chamber,make sure there was not a round in the gun, pull the trigger and finally they would take the ejected round put it back in the magazine.
Then the next time they used the gun, rinse lather repeat.
The repeated chambering of that first round in the magazine caused the bullet to get pushed back into the case each time it was run up the feed ramp.
Do it enough times and when you finally fire that round, the setback induced over pressurization would cause the case to fail and the rest is history.
Many people who carried G22's and cleared the gun daily would only use the round twice, then toss it in a can to use at the range.
View attachment 964714
The PX-9 uses Sig P226 mags, correct? So plenty of OEM and aftermarket options for those.Ive had no problems with my Turkish 9mm either...they've been 100% for me..the Canik TP9SF and Tisas PX-9. Run like a top. I had many thousands thru my TP9SF before I sold it to buy the PX-9 for the range. Only reason I changed is cause the PX9 gen 3 had all the optics cut, and full 20 round mags and suppressor barrel for dirt cheap money. Ive got 1K thru it and its never burped.
Canik was a MA gun with crip mags so no reason to keep that thing....
I have seen $7500 guns run like shit with specific ammo. There isnt a single gun that I know of that would run any ammo well. The OAL of different ammo manufacturers alone vary enough that any given gun can group 5”’at 10 yards and 1” depending on ammo at best and at worst have feeding and ejection problems.Disagreed. I've had guns that run garbage ammo all day long. Tolerances matter.
In that vein, does specific models matter? Outside of my Glock 44, aren't all glocks essentially "pick up, load generic target ammo, shoot" whether it is a 9mm, .357 Sig, .40, or .45?IMHO
SW model 10
Glock 19
it is difficult to screw up a glock, but if you decide to never clean it, it will eventually stop running too.In that vein, does specific models matter? Outside of my Glock 44, aren't all glocks essentially "pick up, load generic target ammo, shoot" whether it is a 9mm, .357 Sig, .40, or .45?
I was about to mention thisRevolver? Manurhin MR73. (The GIGN operators shoot 150 rounds PER DAY! That’s approximately 30k rounds per year, and the guns keep ticking. That’s some scary numbers, and I don’t think that there are many semis that could keep up.
You win this thread500 years old, still in factory-new condition
(needs some cleaning)
![]()
Oldest US firearm discovered in Arizona: a 500-year-old relic of Coronado's expedition
Archaeologists in Arizona have unearthed a bronze cannon linked to the 16th-century expedition of Francisco Vázquez de Coronadoarchaeologymag.com
Ive not seen a horrible glock yet. I think over the years I've had them in every flavor except 45 GAYAP, .380 and .22.I do not believe there is a single answer to the stated question. Most reliable with what ammo? What state of maintenance? There is not a single handgun that eats well everything. I have seen horrible Glocks and perfect 22lr pistols and everything in between.
Pick a gun that has good track record, keep it stock and clean it regularly, experiment with ammo to see what it likes and practice, practice, practice…
I'll bet you didn't get to fire either of the 9x21 GlocksIve not seen a horrible glock yet. I think over the years I've had them in every flavor except 45 GAYAP, .380 and .22.