If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
No way my M9 in the Army and 92FS as a civilian was more reliable than my glocks.Beretta 92FS/M9: 35,000
Glock 17 Gen5: 20,000
Most likely an unmaintained m9.No way my M9 in the Army and 92FS as a civilian was more reliable than my glocks.
I have a G34 with thousands and thousands if rounds and i cant even recal a time its had any issues. M9? A lot.
My 92FS wasnt neglectedMost likely an unmaintained m9.
Because we all know how cheap the military is.
The tests were performed in a controlled environment.No way my M9 in the Army and 92FS as a civilian was more reliable than my glocks.
I have a G34 with thousands and thousands if rounds and i cant even recal a time its had any issues. M9? A lot.
Who maintained it? If a 92 has problems, it's either been F^$D with, made in USA, or not taken care of.My 92FS wasnt neglected
I think mine was made in Maryland?Who maintained it? If a 92 has problems, it's either been F^$D with, made in USA, or not taken care of.
Cool article, but typical of a guy paid to sell a product. You can see some odd things in his writing that indicates he's not afraid to exaggerate greatly to make a point.
Nothing wrong with the Maryland made 92s. Not as pretty and Gucci as an Italian inox but they run. The military ones that have gone tens of thousands of rounds without spring and parts changes 'suck', no shit.Who maintained it? If a 92 has problems, it's either been F^$D with, made in USA, or not taken care of.
Considering Italian work ethic and general reliability, I'd rather have a US one.Nothing wrong with the Maryland made 92s. Not as pretty and Gucci as an Italian inox but they run. The military ones that have gone tens of thousands of rounds without spring and parts changes 'suck', no shit.
Did not read all the posts so apologize if someone beat me to it, H&K new kid, not quite, been in business since late 1800's, they were also the first to make a polymer frame gun.
Yeah, not in this case. Italian version have one type of finish and steel frame. US version futzes with finishes and aluminum frames. As a result, US versions have all sorts of finish defects and frames that ding just by looking at them.Considering Italian work ethic and general reliability, I'd rather have a US one.
Why would they not be Glock fans? Something like a Beretta would take a higher-skilled person to fix something. Break the front sight on the older M9's, CZ 75's, etc. and you're out of luck. Break one on a Glock - simple change out. Damaged firing pin, extractor, bad ejector spring, etc. - easy peasy to fix, by almost anyone.The tests were performed in a controlled environment.
Your perception is based on experience of a hand me down M9 maintained by a 20yo armorer from the swamps of Louisiana who can fix any shotgun with a hammer and duct tape but who's never seen or touched a handgun until he enlisted.
I bet your personal G34 was cleaned regularly, upgraded and maintained by you or a gunsmith with decades of experience working on handguns.
There is a reason why the militaries of countries that actually engage in fighting, are not Glock fans.
US used M9 for over 30 years and is currently uses SIG
IDF uses CZ 75-derived Jericho
Bundeswehr uses HK USP
My first gun --- G17 can't find anything bad to say about it and still runs great after 15 years. I will admit that I switched to G19 for my bedside gun.Sig 226. Because even if it jams, and it never jams, one can simply turn it around and start swinging.
Boy are you reaching! I've broken front sights on a Glock more than once. Never on a M9. One uses a skinny screw that breaks is slightly overtightened, while the other is part of a single chunk of steel the slide is cut out of.Why would they not be Glock fans? Something like a Beretta would take a higher-skilled person to fix something. Break the front sight on the older M9's, CZ 75's, etc. and you're out of luck. Break one on a Glock - simple change out. Damaged firing pin, extractor, bad ejector spring, etc. - easy peasy to fix, by almost anyone.
One of my first guns was a used Beretta 92. Damaged front post sight. Worthless. No way to repair it. Fortunately, the dealer (bought it online) took it back and swapped it for another.Boy are you reaching! I've broken front sights on a Glock more than once. Never on a M9. One uses a skinny screw that breaks is slightly overtightened, while the other is part of a single chunk of steel the slide is cut out of.
P.S. My primary gun is a Glock 23 which I've owned for over 25 years and shoot it regulargly.
Which Beretta was it? Was it with removable front sight or the one that’s part of the slide?One of my first guns was a used Beretta 92. Damaged front post sight. Worthless. No way to repair it. Fortunately, the dealer (bought it online) took it back and swapped it for another.
No way my M9 in the Army and 92FS as a civilian was more reliable than my glocks.
I have a G34 with thousands and thousands if rounds and i cant even recal a time its had any issues. M9? A lot.
Yeah... but it's a school bus.I don't think the average m9 is shit but the triggers are pure douche chill land. My 92X is great.
Its narrow up top thoYeah... but it's a school bus.![]()
Mine would have major feeding problems after 300 or so rounds without cleaning it.I don't think the average m9 is shit but the triggers are pure douche chill land. My 92X is great.
That gun was broken. 92s will usually shoot till the locking block breaks.Mine would have major feeding problems after 300 or so rounds without cleaning it.
Fixed sight - part of the slide. The A3/A4 with a removeable front post make more sense. Had a 92x after. Rear notch cut so sight even gunsmiths couldn't drift it (it was off center, to start). Had to go back to the factory to be fixed. 4 months later....Which Beretta was it? Was it with removable front sight or the one that’s part of the slide?
Something is not kosher with your story. First it's a sight made out of hard steel being broken now the rear sight is "too tight" that, not one, but multiple "gunsmiths" couldn't move it.Fixed sight - part of the slide. The A3/A4 with a removeable front post make more sense. Had a 92x after. Rear notch cut so sight even gunsmiths couldn't drift it (it was off center, to start). Had to go back to the factory to be fixed. 4 months later....
Only time I've had an issue is related to mag issues.Mine would have major feeding problems after 300 or so rounds without cleaning it.
I had non stop mag issues with my m9. One of my issued mags was completely broken, wouldn't feed anythingOnly time I've had an issue is related to mag issues.
Weak spring, or shit aftermarket mag/mag spring.
My eagle mags had feeding issue problems.
I replaced them with either Wolfe or OEM. Can't recall if I did the follower as well.
Either way, after replacement, zero issues.
Other than 1 I caused myself and took me a while to figure out.
Hint, for the 96, don't use the lightened mcarbo sear spring. It causes some "ooopsies". Don't ask how I know.
It was a known thing besides the lack of maintenance, the military bought checkmate shit mags to cheap out on.I had non stop mag issues with my m9. One of my issued mags was completely broken, wouldn't feed anything![]()