This would be awesome. I'm going to do my best to further this misconception. Next time I see or hear someone say "gunshow loophole" I'll say "Obama fixed that!".
I hope you are wrong Len, even though I know you aren't very often
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Obama to Announce New Executive Action concerning guns:
- Thread starter edseas2
- Start date
This would be awesome. I'm going to do my best to further this misconception. Next time I see or hear someone say "gunshow loophole" I'll say "Obama fixed that!".
I hope you are wrong Len, even though I know you aren't very often
I don't even drink.... Maybe it could help though.
True.... Antis will be anti right down to the end goal of making sure society has no hard objects remaining like metal, rocks and sticks. And even then, they won't stop...
Sent via Tapatalk on my Android phone. Good news; Tapatalk sucks less than it used to.
He's BSing right now. Mark barden the CEO from sandy hook promise who now literally gets paid off his dead kid lied prior to obama but no station played the audio.
Nothing new here, just more lectures from a moron who doesn't know the subject at all.
Nothing new here, just more lectures from a moron who doesn't know the subject at all.
![[puke]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/023.gif "Puke [puke]")
Even if that does happen they'll just pick something else to act retarded about with some other buzzwords. It'll be the "mental health loophole" next or some other bullshit.
-Mike
![[rofl]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/013.gif "ROFL [rofl]")
1903Collector
NES Member
shotguns will soon be "multi-projectile weapons"
MachineHead
NES Member
I vote for this ALL the way. I'm just going to spread this like it's gospel when I hear any mullarkey about this "now-dead" issue of the deadly "gun show loophole".
Can't the next POTUS just undo them? I won't hold my breath that any of the RINOs (incl. Frump) would actually do that though.
Last edited:
How about a background check as a qualifier to exercise your first amendment rights? 4th? 5th? Would you tolerate that? If you're too dangerous to own a gun you belong in jail. If you're a free person, you're free to exercise your natural rights. All of them.
I want to know too, can I pay in Bitcoins as well?
1903Collector
NES Member
I'm still trying to figure that one out as well?
Because people are stupid. I just had one of my guys looks at me like a deer. "You can do that?"
me "No, you can't. Go online and try. If you find a place that will, let me know. I got shit to buy"
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 47,805
- Likes
- 34,121
The feds have consistently taken the approach that an FFL will be issued only to one in the business of dealing guns, and will not issue them to support hobbyists. Typically, one has had to have business hours and a place for customers, or be engaged in a business that requires an FFL (gunwriter, gunsmith, etc.).
The silver lining to this could be a determination that FFLs must be issued on a much broader basis, including to the individual who sells one or two guns a year from his collection. Looking at MA, where up to 4 does not require a MA dealer license, and you could have a lot of people applying for "home FFLs" who do not intend to be "in the business". Note that the MA requirement of a non-residential address is for a MA dealer's or gunsmith's license; not an FFL.
The silver lining to this could be a determination that FFLs must be issued on a much broader basis, including to the individual who sells one or two guns a year from his collection. Looking at MA, where up to 4 does not require a MA dealer license, and you could have a lot of people applying for "home FFLs" who do not intend to be "in the business". Note that the MA requirement of a non-residential address is for a MA dealer's or gunsmith's license; not an FFL.
....and the other one referencing the 'increase' in deaths in the other state he mentioned.
Its not a valid study at all, shocker....read when you have time you will see it is skewed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...40-percent-after-connecticut-passed-this-law/
Yeah pretty much this.
You used to be able to buy guns in hardware stores just like any other tool and it wasn't a problem. "Gun violence" is a manufactured problem designed to slowly chip away at a very fundamental freedom. To a lot of people it might seem reasonable to to have background checks for dangerous items but if that's the issue why no background checks for cars, hammers, knives, bleach, fireworks, sharp pieces of broken glass, screwdrivers, nail guns, baseball bats, tire irons, pointy sticks, etc etc etc.
