If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
My understanding is that on a stripped lower the MA dealer only completes the 4473 and has no obligation to complete any reporting to the state since the item in question is not a firearm yet. They would complete the FA10 on a complete rifle. Am I wrong on this? I purchased a lower yesterday, I’ll eFA10 it today. I also took a picture of the 4473 on my phone since I didn’t get a paper receipt for the lower.
Haven't read yet, but need to see how/if the reluctant progressive judge justified upholding the standard magazine ban.Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
Anyone feeling depressed should read this federal decision chucking the NJ ban.
"...is whether the possession of the AR-15 for use within the home for self-defense is unconstitutional under the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. For the reasons enumerated below, the AR-15 Provision is unconstitutional."
Good but I’m not a fan of the 10 rd mag limitation.Adobe Acrobat
Anyone feeling depressed should read this federal decision chucking the NJ ban.
"...is whether the possession of the AR-15 for use within the home for self-defense is unconstitutional under the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. For the reasons enumerated below, the AR-15 Provision is unconstitutional."
If for no other reason than the judge’s obvious frustration at having to rule in our favor… it’s delicious like chocolate ice cream on a hot day.Adobe Acrobat
Anyone feeling depressed should read this federal decision chucking the NJ ban-at least for AR15s even though it allows the evil assaulty mag ban.
"...is whether the possession of the AR-15 for use within the home for self-defense is unconstitutional under the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. For the reasons enumerated below, the AR-15 Provision is unconstitutional."
Yes, rimfire is exempt unless it’s added to the evil gun roster.
This has the potential to be a total shit show.
Amazingly narrow all the way down to just the colt ar-15 in the home for defense as that was the defendants limited stated desire. And a true whining by the judge. But a positive outcome.Adobe Acrobat
Anyone feeling depressed should read this federal decision chucking the NJ ban-at least for AR15s even though it allows the evil assaulty mag ban.
"...is whether the possession of the AR-15 for use within the home for self-defense is unconstitutional under the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. For the reasons enumerated below, the AR-15 Provision is unconstitutional."
Correct. The ability of EOPS to add what they think belongs on the roster of evil is likely a fail constitutionally on multiple fronts especially now with Chevron deference gone (thank god). It also opens up the arbitrary taking (5th amendment) by executive branch beaurocrats. It could easily get the most liberal of judges tied into a knot ruling in out favor.
Yes. That is how the law reads.
You can feel the hatred in the judges heart at having to write those wordsAdobe Acrobat
Anyone feeling depressed should read this federal decision chucking the NJ ban-at least for AR15s even though it allows the evil assaulty mag ban.
"...is whether the possession of the AR-15 for use within the home for self-defense is unconstitutional under the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. For the reasons enumerated below, the AR-15 Provision is unconstitutional."
If it's added then they would need to notify you and give you a reasonable period to dispossess.
Go back to the first post. Answered there.
I'm thinking pre 10/23 (or 8/1 IDFK) long guns will be treated like pre 98 handguns?
Declaring that the grandfathering deadline as of the HealyBan date is not a conservative view. It is an agenda based view that puts persons who act based on this statement at legal risk.
Section 131¾. (a) The secretary of public safety and security shall, with the advice of the firearm control advisory board established in section 131½ compile and publish a roster of assault-style firearms banned under section 131M and a roster of firearms approved for sale and use in the commonwealth using the parameters set forth in section 123. The secretary shall, not less than 3 times annually, review, update, and publish the rosters online, and send a copy to all persons licensed in the commonwealth pursuant to section 122. Licensing authorities shall provide information on these rosters to all permit and card holders and licensees upon initial issuance and every renewal.
Owning a gun puts you at legal risk.
The post is about purchasing and possessing firearms with the new law. Yes, OTHER things have changed, but they are out of scope of the post per the title of the thread. So no, nothing was now wrong in the first paragraph. You are talking about LTCs and training and stuff beyond what I have posted about. I’m talking about current LTC holders and what they can buy and possess based on the new law.
Awesome. People get to roll the dice 3 times a year to see if what they currently own is no longer lawful (and do the copies / duplicates test).
They're not going to go back and touch any of that shit because that involves the takings issue and just opens them up to even more stuff the pieces of shit that passed this thing are going to be on to the next moonbat thing for the next session or two.
They can have my MA stuff for their trouble, my really good stuff is with my Bro in PA (NOT philly)
