Write your reps everyone and thank them. Don't forget, that a**h*** Reid is still trying to pursue background checks. It was a good day today for 2A!
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Sen. Toomey said:[T]he Second Amendment does not apply equally to every single American.
Gun bill dealt setback as amendment fails - MarketWatch
Sen John Cornyn R-Texas Minority Whip condemning Obummer for what he said yesterday. He's pissed.
First of two amendments up for vote. This one's good, I hope it passes; Withholds law enforcement grants from states & localities that release gun ownership data.
- - - Updated - - -
Leahy is opposing it.
AND IT PASSED!
67 v 30
In other words, out of all the gun control amendments so far, the only one passed is good for us.
There is no way the underlying bill gets passed, so I don't think it matters much...
AND IT PASSED!
67 v 30
In other words, out of all the gun control amendments so far, the only one passed is good for us.
There is no way the underlying bill gets passed, so I don't think it matters much...
When does the bill in general get voted on?
Not sure, today after 2pm maybe?
And since most of the amendments got voted down, the bill in it's entirety should also be voted down, correct??
What is this also about Harry Reid being able to vote on it later??
That would seem to depend on a couple things:And since most of the amendments got voted down, the bill in it's entirety should also be voted down, correct??
What is this also about Harry Reid being able to vote on it later??
Yes, if you go back and read the text of the original Senate bill S.649, its bad.
Text of S. 649: Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013 (Placed on Calendar in the Senate version) - GovTrack.us
That would seem to depend on a couple things:
1. Did they agree to a 60 vote requirement for bills or just cloture and amendment? They have the votes if they only need 51
2. This bill now has the stench of failure on it, do blue dogs and RINOs want to have to explain the nuance of supporting the "clean” bill but not the very dirty amendments?
3. The bill now has downside in it for the antis, so do they want it anymore without the AWB or even UBC?
That would seem to depend on a couple things:
1. Did they agree to a 60 vote requirement for bills or just cloture and amendment? They have the votes if they only need 51
2. This bill now has the stench of failure on it, do blue dogs and RINOs want to have to explain the nuance of supporting the "clean” bill but not the very dirty amendments?
3. The bill now has downside in it for the antis, so do they want it anymore without the AWB or even UBC?
Honestly, I am not sure what master he is serving at this point. He has been running into traffic this whole time with this process and leaving everyone angrier for it.Reid may not even bring it up for a vote, to save face, correct?
Anyone have a WSJ account?
Sen. Joe Manchin Continues Push for Gun Bill, Background Checks - WSJ.com
Google search the link and click on the result, what paywall?
Bing didn't find this...thanks
Sen. Manchin: Still Sees 70 Votes to Expand Background Checks - WSJ.com