Asaltweapon
NES Member
OP ain’t spending that kind of coin judging by past threads.S&W 41.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
OP ain’t spending that kind of coin judging by past threads.S&W 41.
Wow you don't have High StandardsEither RUGER or BUCKMARK.
The only downside about the Buckmark is cleaning, it is a little tougher, but it can easily be cleaned without removing the sight (if you put a dot). I use one every weekend and clean it every weekend.
All other .22 are second class citizens.
Get the one that fits your hands and runs reliably. SR22's are for child hands,..
It's a cute little plastic toy gun for children. My nephews love to pretend shoot mine.Y’all have baby hands or something?
The SR22 is tiny
Good call, forgot about that one.
I bought the Sig 322 a few months ago, so far, I have about 6 to 7 hundred rounds of all types of ammo through it, including the really cheap stuff, and so far, no problems at all. I once owned A Sig Mosquito, which only worked with CCI Mini Mags. I also owned a Ruger SR-22, that pistol was like a toy. It worked fine with most ammo, but every time I fired it I was picking up pieces of the pistol. front sight, slide stop, and the rear sights would not stay zeroed, so I has to adjust them every time I fired the pistol. I also had the Walther P-22, the same deal built like a toy. The only difference between the Walther and Ruger is at least the Ruger SR-22 worked, that's more than I could say for the Walther P-22. And many years ago, I owned the ISSC Glock look-alike pistol. That pistol was so bad that it made the Sig Mosquito and Walther P-22 look good. Next to my AMT backup in .380, that was my most unreliable pistol.AM looking for one. I've read reviews all over the internet and you know they are up and down. I've had a Ruger MKIV, and it was great but I'm looking for one like the Walthers, the Taurus TX22, Sig 322.
The Sig 322 would be my first choice over the Taurus since I have 9mm Sigs. But one review I read said it was very ammo fussy. The Taurus, I talked with one guy at my club who had a TX22 and he said it was reliable. I like that it has a 16 rd mag and comes with 2. I don't know anything else about any of the others so that is where I need some hands on reviews from owners. Thanks
Main reason for not buying the Sig is the extra $125. I can buy a lot of 22's with that. Secondly, the Taurus guide rod and barrel come out of the gun just like a 9MM would. Very easy to take down and clean, the sig barrel is fixed unless you take the pin out.I bought the Sig 322 a few months ago, so far, I have about 6 to 7 hundred rounds of all types of ammo through it, including the really cheap stuff, and so far, no problems at all. I once owned A Sig Mosquito, which only worked with CCI Mini Mags. I also owned a Ruger SR-22, that pistol was like a toy. It worked fine with most ammo, but every time I fired it I was picking up pieces of the pistol. front sight, slide stop, and the rear sights would not stay zeroed, so I has to adjust them every time I fired the pistol. I also had the Walther P-22, the same deal built like a toy. The only difference between the Walther and Ruger is at least the Ruger SR-22 worked, that's more than I could say for the Walther P-22. And many years ago, I owned the ISSC Glock look-alike pistol. That pistol was so bad that it made the Sig Mosquito and Walther P-22 look good. Next to my AMT backup in .380, that was my most unreliable pistol.
what was your beef with a mark iv, if you indeed have it? as it is way better than anything else listed above.Main reason for not buying the Sig is the extra $125. I can buy a lot of 22's with that. Secondly, the Taurus guide rod and barrel come out of the gun just like a 9MM would. Very easy to take down and clean, the sig barrel is fixed unless you take the pin out.
Ruger has the best warranty in the business. All you have to do is send it back. If it keeps giving you problems they replace it. I sent mine out... still had some issues and they gave me a brand new gun. No questions asked. Has over 10,000 through her.The FN 502 is a pretty nice little piece of equipment.
The Ruger SR-22 is really hit or miss. Mine is a piece of shit, and the only gun I somewhat regret buying. On the other hand, I've shot ones that are pretty decent.
It was accurate as hell, I was beating people with red dots and I didn't use one at our 22 shoots. The only thing I didn't like was the charging handle.what was your beef with a mark iv, if you indeed have it? as it is way better than anything else listed above.
It will be difficult to beat old mark iv or 22/45. Latter does not even feel a target pistol, really.I really wonder what part of I don't want a target
It was accurate as hell, I was beating people with red dots and I didn't use one at our 22 shoots. The only thing I didn't like was the charging handle.
Figure I sell everything there since they were Mass compliant and buy whatever I want up here with no mag restrictions. Starting over.
Do they clean it if I send it back?Ruger has the best warranty in the business. All you have to do is send it back. If it keeps giving you problems they replace it. I sent mine out... still had some issues and they gave me a brand new gun. No questions asked. Has over 10,000 through her.
Only one way to find out. Let me know how you make out. Ill gladly send back myDo they clean it if I send it back?
I don't want to clean mine, but I would definitely make up a BS problem to send it back and have them clean it.
Great guns with millions of parts.Good call, forgot about that one.
Absolutely rightOP ain’t spending that kind of coin judging by past threads.
those things are the best one can get. i`ll take your mkIV and raise it my 22/45.You like to pimp out your 22 with gadget race bling ? You want a Ruger MK III or IV
View attachment 758707
Shot the beretta this weekend. Loved it, even though it’s a double / single.Berreta 92 conversion kit is fun.
So is the verdict that the modern GSG Firefly is a better choice than the Mosquito. Most of the complaints seem to be with SIG, not GSG. And many of the problems seem to be "fixable" with some tweaking of the parts and ammo choices.I picked up a Sig Mosquito when they first came out (as a plinker for the wife).
First range trip = JAMMO-MATIC Palooza
I guess that this was not uncommon when they first came out (from the many reports that I had read).
I sent it back to Sig. They couldn't fix it (that particular pistol), so they sent me back an entirely different & new Mosquito, upgraded with a stainless slide.
The new one works and we still have it (with a Gemtech threaded barrel for it, and a 22LR suppressor).
The issues were really with the newer ones when they first came out. Sig deduced the issue and corrected them in later models. That being said, all 22LR semi-autos can be picky eaters, so we stick to CCI copper mini-mags with all of our 22LR semi auto rifles and pistols.
They were never made by Sig. I’m not sure but I don’t think anything has changed but the name. I’d steer clear with all the other models that have come out.So is the verdict that the modern GSG Firefly is a better choice than the Mosquito. Most of the complaints seem to be with SIG, not GSG. And many of the problems seem to be "fixable" with some tweaking of the parts and ammo choices.
Try FN502, superior in every way for both target and tactical applications. Much better than recent p322. looks and feels like FN 509. TAC but shoots like a Pardini with comfortable ergonomics. In tactical speed drills I was getting 1 inch groups at 10 yards, while my buddy shooting a p322 with a red dot ending up with 12-inch groups. It is hammer fired and a bit heavier than p322. I never cleaned it and been putting everything through it. So far no malfunctions for the first 500 rounds. Another thing, trigger is amazing, like a 1911. Youtube reviews spoke highly of it but I was skeptical. Having shot most target and tactical 22lr models in the market, I can tell you the FN 502 is the best gun out there bar none. do yourself a favor and stop with others you be upgrading in an attempt to make them perfect. At low $500s this is already perfect. I have no relation to FN. Just an extremely satisfied users. Lastly, it fit most of my G19 and of course FN509 holsters.
Now that GSG is directly importing the Firefly (aka SIG Mosquito), is it still junk or have most of the problems been (or can be) fixed?
You are a brave man to be going against the NES collective (highly negative) opinion on this. I applaud your courage in even considering the idea.So is the verdict that the modern GSG Firefly is a better choice than the Mosquito. Most of the complaints seem to be with SIG, not GSG. And many of the problems seem to be "fixable" with some tweaking of the parts and ammo choices.