Dadstoys
NES Member
Keep piling up the the tinder dumb biotch .
Let's see the claim of pure motive argued in front of the supremes with gems like this tossed on the table.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Supreme Court - NYSRPA v. Bruen - Megathread
- Thread starter soloman02
- Start date
Let's see the claim of pure motive argued in front of the supremes with gems like this tossed on the table.
I had to look him up. Here you go:
Garys
NES Member
I'm going to post this here since it's a direct result of Bruen. The dupe police can let me know if someone else has already posted it.
gunrightsfoundation.org
Massachusetts “Assault Weapon” and Magazine Ban Lawsuit
The National Foundation for Gun Rights is suing the state of Massachusetts to overturn their so called "assault weapon" and magazine ban. With the decision handed down in Bruen, laws like this one…
gunrightsfoundation.org
Yeah, there is a thread about it.
Palladin
NES Member
California Handgun Roster Faces New Lawsuit
One of the Golden State’s more unusual gun control laws is facing its first new challenge in a post-Bruen landscape.
thereload.com
CatSnoutSoup
NES Member
GOAL's has a new NYSRPA vs. Bruen t-shirt featuring Justice Thomas.
At the GOAL store
And they have big boy sizes.
I am 6'4" (yes unusual for a tabby cat) and anything under 4x shrinks in length first wash to show my belly button (also unusual for a tabby cat).
Get a cool shirt, tout the Bruen decision, honor Justice Thomas, and support GOAL all at the same time.
Too cool, yes?
Note: I had to go to the bottom right corner to set currency to US $ it defaulted to Euro
At the GOAL store
And they have big boy sizes.
I am 6'4" (yes unusual for a tabby cat) and anything under 4x shrinks in length first wash to show my belly button (also unusual for a tabby cat).
Get a cool shirt, tout the Bruen decision, honor Justice Thomas, and support GOAL all at the same time.
Too cool, yes?
Note: I had to go to the bottom right corner to set currency to US $ it defaulted to Euro
MaverickNH
NES Member
Panel 1 – 8:45-9:45 am – Keynote Discussion: Criminal Justice and Prosecutorial Discretion in the Wake of Bruen
Moderator: Vincent Southerland (NYU)
Panelists: Alvin Bragg (Manhattan District Attorney), Zellnor Myrie (New York State Senator), Steven Wu (Chief of Appeals, Manhattan DA’s Office)
Panel 2 – 9:50-10:55 am – Bruen’s Methodology and Practical Consequences for Legislation and Criminal Law
Moderator: Mark Tushnet (Harvard)
Panelists: Cynthia Lee (George Washington), Eric Ruben (SMU), Eugene Volokh (UCLA)
Panel 3 – 11:00-12:05 pm – Sensitive Places and the Challenges of Applying Bruen in the Lower Courts
Moderator: Jamal Greene (Columbia)
Panelists: Joseph Blocher (Duke), Jacob Charles (Pepperdine), Adam Samaha (NYU), Reva Siegel (Yale)
Panel 4 – 12:40-1:45 pm – After Bruen: Implications for Law Enforcement, Stare Decisis, and Supreme Court Legitimacy
Moderator: Sanford Levinson (Texas)
Panelists: Brandon del Pozo (Rhode Island Hospital), Mary Anne Franks (Miami), Barry Friedman (NYU), Haley Proctor (Missouri)
In case you haven’t guessed it by looking at that lineup of speakers, the firearms law center at Duke is not, in any way, objective about firearms law. They are very pro gun control.
Last edited:
I hope the audience loads up with pro-rights people.
Whoever is going needs to find out how to get their questions submitted. Often times, it is all hammered out BEFORE the event even begins.
Whoever is going needs to find out how to get their questions submitted. Often times, it is all hammered out BEFORE the event even begins.
MaverickNH
NES Member
I stayed over in the guest room of someone from Upstate NY in Saratoga this weekend and saw this on the nightstand. The owner said they have them in each room in case of intruders. I just said, it’s a good idea to have some form of self-defense in a home. Given I was a guest, I didn’t say anything more…
MaverickNH
NES Member
Here’s a weird one - an Ohio judge addressing historical analysis as per Bruen. It seems the judge is stuck on a what-if - what if Blacks and women had the vote during the founding era and those earlier times Thomas expanded on a relevant in such analyses. But history is not what might have happened if things had been different, is it?
reason.com
"Importantly, the glaring flaw in any analysis of the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation in relation to Ohio's gun laws is that no such analysis could account for what the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation would have been if women and nonwhite people had been able to vote for the representatives who determined these regulations. How would this problem be addressed in any modern analysis of historical gun regulations? It cannot simply be ignored. And even if a court tries to take the views of women and nonwhite people into account, are there sufficient materials on their views available to enable reliable conclusions to be made?"
Ohio Supreme Court Justice Expresses Doubt About Appellate Decisions About History in Second Amendment Cases
From yesterday's Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. Philpotts, where one underlying question is whether a ban on gun…
reason.com
"Importantly, the glaring flaw in any analysis of the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation in relation to Ohio's gun laws is that no such analysis could account for what the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation would have been if women and nonwhite people had been able to vote for the representatives who determined these regulations. How would this problem be addressed in any modern analysis of historical gun regulations? It cannot simply be ignored. And even if a court tries to take the views of women and nonwhite people into account, are there sufficient materials on their views available to enable reliable conclusions to be made?"
SteelShooter
NES Member
Here’s a weird one - an Ohio judge addressing historical analysis as per Bruen. It seems the judge is stuck on a what-if - what if Blacks and women had the vote during the founding era and those earlier times Thomas expanded on a relevant in such analyses. But history is not what might have happened if things had been different, is it?
Ohio Supreme Court Justice Expresses Doubt About Appellate Decisions About History in Second Amendment Cases
From yesterday's Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. Philpotts, where one underlying question is whether a ban on gun…
"Importantly, the glaring flaw in any analysis of the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation in relation to Ohio's gun laws is that no such analysis could account for what the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation would have been if women and nonwhite people had been able to vote for the representatives who determined these regulations. How would this problem be addressed in any modern analysis of historical gun regulations? It cannot simply be ignored. And even if a court tries to take the views of women and nonwhite people into account, are there sufficient materials on their views available to enable reliable conclusions to be made?"
What a Neanderthal , he didn't even mention trans people.
71montess
NES Member
And therefore to my hypothesis that women getting the right to vote started the decline of the American way of life. No disrespect to NES gun loving, intelligent women.Here’s a weird one - an Ohio judge addressing historical analysis as per Bruen. It seems the judge is stuck on a what-if - what if Blacks and women had the vote during the founding era and those earlier times Thomas expanded on a relevant in such analyses. But history is not what might have happened if things had been different, is it?
Ohio Supreme Court Justice Expresses Doubt About Appellate Decisions About History in Second Amendment Cases
From yesterday's Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. Philpotts, where one underlying question is whether a ban on gun…
"Importantly, the glaring flaw in any analysis of the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation in relation to Ohio's gun laws is that no such analysis could account for what the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation would have been if women and nonwhite people had been able to vote for the representatives who determined these regulations. How would this problem be addressed in any modern analysis of historical gun regulations? It cannot simply be ignored. And even if a court tries to take the views of women and nonwhite people into account, are there sufficient materials on their views available to enable reliable conclusions to be made?"
From the link (WTF):California Handgun Roster Faces New Lawsuit
One of the Golden State’s more unusual gun control laws is facing its first new challenge in a post-Bruen landscape.
"A 2020 amendment to the UHA, signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom (D.), added a new requirement that for every new semiautomatic handgun approved to the roster, three previously approved handguns must be removed. That provision went into effect last month."
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
- Messages
- 57,041
- Likes
- 21,193
. . . until there is only 1!!
Talon3
NES Member
What is this gem in the footnote? Does not apply to out of state persons holding an out of state license?
Attachments
Jason Flare
NES Member
I think you have to have an out of state license and a New York State license.
Not easy.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2019
- Messages
- 2,208
- Likes
- 3,529
I wish they would do that with welfare recipients.
What is that, a bundle of sticks with duct tape around them?
SteelShooter
NES Member
It's the "Ronco 2000" self protector, as seen in TV.
KBCraig
NES Member
Mussolini would approve.
Talon3
NES Member
Interesting indeed as I don't think there is a non resident license option in NYC. Must be like the fable of the mass permit to purchase.
JuergenG
NES Member
Of course the last one left would be a muzzle loading, single shot pistol which must be kept in a min. 1-ton safe and be of course unloaded.
CatSnoutSoup
NES Member
Cap'n Mike
NES Member
Maybe its referring to a persons FOPA right to travel through New York City without stopping?
Set it, and forget it.
Dennis in MA
NES Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
- Messages
- 40,798
- Likes
- 36,284
GOAL's has a new NYSRPA vs. Bruen t-shirt featuring Justice Thomas.
At the GOAL store
And they have big boy sizes.
I am 6'4" (yes unusual for a tabby cat) and anything under 4x shrinks in length first wash to show my belly button (also unusual for a tabby cat).
Get a cool shirt, tout the Bruen decision, honor Justice Thomas, and support GOAL all at the same time.
Too cool, yes?
Note: I had to go to the bottom right corner to set currency to US $ it defaulted to Euro
It's sad that the image is. . . . . a mASS legal frame transfer.
Here’s a weird one - an Ohio judge addressing historical analysis as per Bruen. It seems the judge is stuck on a what-if - what if Blacks and women had the vote during the founding era and those earlier times Thomas expanded on a relevant in such analyses. But history is not what might have happened if things had been different, is it?
Ohio Supreme Court Justice Expresses Doubt About Appellate Decisions About History in Second Amendment Cases
From yesterday's Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. Philpotts, where one underlying question is whether a ban on gun…
"Importantly, the glaring flaw in any analysis of the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation in relation to Ohio's gun laws is that no such analysis could account for what the United States' historical tradition of firearm regulation would have been if women and nonwhite people had been able to vote for the representatives who determined these regulations. How would this problem be addressed in any modern analysis of historical gun regulations? It cannot simply be ignored. And even if a court tries to take the views of women and nonwhite people into account, are there sufficient materials on their views available to enable reliable conclusions to be made?"
He also should mention we didn't consider if Aliens or Dinosaurs were around at the same time. It's very likely that 2A would look dramatically different - it would be not a right but a REQUIREMENT. It simply cannot be ignored!
You'd be better off with some big-ass realistic dildo. Nobody wants to be beaten with that. LOL
